NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  Fastarc C-1

  

  G1's sponge is a soft version.
  It is not easy to use.
  The seat is the same as G1.
  It faces athletes to hit and beat.
  I think whether it is suitable for rubbing.

  It is recommended for those who feel that G1 became shallow and it did not work well.
  There is a possibility that loss may come out with powerful players.

  Personally I think that it is better to use it on the foreground of elementary school students, from the vicinity of junior high school students on the back side.

  Lifespan is not long.
  The performance can be fully demonstrated in about two months, and when it exceeds, slip loss starts to appear.
  If you change before the game, please change two weeks in advance.

  See original review Hide original review

  G1のスポンジが軟らかいバージョンです。
  使いにくさはありません。
  シートはG1と同じです。
  食い込ませて打つ選手に向いてます。
  擦り打ちには向かないかと思います。

  G1では食い込みが浅くなってうまく使えなかったと感じる人にオススメです。
  パワーのある選手ではロスが出る可能性があります。

  個人的には小学生のフォア面、中学生辺りからはバック面に使用するのが良いかと思います。

  寿命は長くありません。
  性能をフルに発揮できるのは２ヶ月ほどで、超えると滑りのロスが出始めます。
  試合の前に交換するなら２週間前には換えて下さい。

  2017/06/01

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	6
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket APOLONIA ZLC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  12

• 

  APOLONIA ZLC

  

  I used a special material system for a while, it stopped without being fit, but I challenged again.
  Unlike traditional special materials, there is no shrill feeling and it is very easy to use.
  I think that the thickness of the board is 5.7 mm and it is somewhat thinner, ZLC will cover the rebound.
  Although it turns out clearly when compared with five pieces of wood, it feels like somewhat like seven or less.
  Speed ​​is clearly fast.
  This is a unique material here.
  The arc of the drive is low, I will fly a little without having seen it for a moment.
  I think that it is easiest to carry out detailed skills on the table, and I think that it is easiest to use, although I changed the plate about 10 sheets in the past.
  Easy to strike both drive and meat, so you can recommend it for attacking players in general.
  I think that compatibility of rubber is any one if it is a spin type.
  If you want to make the arcs low, Fastark series, if you put out high it is good X Rakuza.
  If it is an attack type, you do not choose a user.

  See original review Hide original review

  一時期特殊素材系を使い、合わずにやめたのですが再度挑戦しました。
  これまでの特殊素材と違って、じゃじゃ馬感がなく非常に使いやすいです。
  板の厚みが5.7㎜でやや薄めだとは思いますが、反発はZLCがカバーしてくれます。
  木材５枚と比べると明らかに回転は落ちますが、７枚と同等かややかかる様に感じます。
  スピードは明らかに速いです。
  ここは特殊素材ならではですね。
  ドライブの弧線が低く、ちょっと見たことの無い飛び方をします。
  台上の細かい技もやり易く、過去10枚ほど板を変えてきましたが一番使いやすいと思います。
  ドライブ、ミートどちらも打ちやすいので、攻撃型の選手全般にオススメできます。
  ラバーの相性はスピン系ならどれでもいいと思います。
  弧線を低く出すならファスターク系、高く出すならラクザXがいいですね。
  攻撃型であれば使い手を選びません。

  2017/05/27

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	6
  Control	8
  Touch	2
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber（Front） Fastarc G-1

  Recommend rubber（Back） Fastarc C-1

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  10

• 

  Rakza X

  

  Although it is a rubber with a considerably long life in recent high performance rubber, I think that it is the limit that 3 months can maintain performance.

  The person who strikes and strikes is more stable than rubbing.
  I think that there are considerable differences depending on hardness, so we recommend purchasing with weight specified.

  I felt it was a strong rubber hook with a strong horizontal stiffness though the seat feels stiff when pushed.
  Although it takes a turn, unlike the recent spin system tension, it does not take as long as you do it yourself.
  The power of a drive is up to the arm, but it is obedient and habitless rubber.

  I think that it is for junior high school students and higher players with some power.

  See original review Hide original review

  最近の高性能ラバーの中ではかなり寿命の長いラバーですが、性能を維持できるのは３ヶ月が限界かと思います。

  擦り打ちよりは食い込ませて打つ方が安定します。
  硬度によって差がかなりあるように思いますので、重量指定で購入することをおすすめします。

  シートは押すと硬めの感触ですが、水平方向の踏ん張りが利く引っ掛かりの強いラバーだと感じました。
  回転はかかりますが、最近のスピン系テンションと違い、自分でかけなければ掛かりません。
  故にドライブの威力は腕次第ですが、素直で癖の無いラバーです。

  中学生以上である程度パワーのある選手向けだと思います。

  2017/06/01

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	8
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Ma Long Five

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  7

• 

  Fastarc G-1

  

  Both spin performance, speed, and control are balanced at a high level and well-balanced.
  I think that it is very hard to use and is a very good rubber.
  If anything, it faces the athlete who makes it hard to dig into the sponge rather than rub it on the surface.
  Since the seat is also not hard, I think that it can be used in a state that fully demonstrates performance from around the junior high school students.

  We do not choose the type of racket to be matched.
  It also fits wood plywood and special materials.

  Lifespan is not long.
  I think that it is the limit that 2 months can maintain the performance by practice for 2 hours each 2 ~ 3 times a week.
  Although it is unavoidable that the rubber surface becomes rough when it deteriorates, I feel that it is easy to take in moisture plus.
  The sheet will start hardening beyond 3 months.

  Since the difference with new goods comes out well, if you exchange before the game, please replace two weeks in advance.

  See original review Hide original review

  スピン性能、スピード、コントロールのいずれも高水準でバランスのいいラバーですです。
  使いにくさもなく、非常に良いラバーだと思います。
  どちらかというと、表面で擦る打ち方よりもスポンジまでしっかり食い込ませて打つ選手に向いてます。
  シートも硬くはありませんので、中学生辺りからフルに性能を発揮した状態で使えると思います。

  合わせるラケットの種類を選びません。
  木材合板にも特殊素材にも合います。

  寿命は長くありません。
  週２～３回各２時間の練習で２ヶ月が性能を維持できる限界かと思います。
  劣化するとラバー表面が荒れるのは仕方の無いことですが、プラスして湿気を取り込みやすいと感じます。
  シートも３ヶ月を超えた辺りで硬化し始めます。

  新品との差が結構出ますので、試合前に交換するなら２週間前には交換して下さい。

  2017/06/01

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	6
  Control	5
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket APOLONIA ZLC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1