NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  Hadraw Shield

  

  I used to use the Matsushita Pro model before, but I was looking for a racket that takes advantage of the high particle size of the backcut usage rate because it is a cut-off type, suffering from plastic balls that are difficult to rotate.
  It is a contradiction that it is contradictory that you can counterattack while suppressing the impetus, but this racket feels that the quality of technology such as bench, drive etc. will be reflected as it is physical ability. If you want to attack, nowadays there is a tension rubber and you can thicken the sponge.
  It is said that today's cutman is an attack, but you can control it like a racket without such features, but it is necessary for the cutman to be like a racket without this feature.
  I think it is a racket that reflects the characteristics of the rubber as it is.

  If you dare to complain
  When price is more than 10,000 yen though it is five pieces of plywood
  The problem is that the density of grip trees is low and they are easily rubbed and soiled.

  See original review Hide original review

  以前は松下プロモデルを使っていましたが、回転のかかりにくいプラスチックボールに悩んで、カット主戦型なのでバックカットの使用率が高い粒高を活かすラケットを探していました。
  弾みを抑えてつつ、反撃も出来るというと矛盾ですが、このラケットは台上、ドライブ等の技術のクオリティーが身体能力そのまま反映される感じです。攻撃がしたければ、今の時代はテンションラバーがありますし、スポンジの厚みを厚くすればよい。
  ツッツキもブロックも弾み過ぎず良い感じにコントロールでき、現代のカットマンは攻撃だと言われますが、この特徴のないラケットみたいなのがカットマンには必要なんじゃないでしょうか？
  ラバーの特性をそのまま反映させるラケットだと思います。

  あえて不満を言うなら
  5枚合板なのに値段が1万円を超えるのと
  グリップの木の密度が低く、擦れて汚れやすいのが難点です。

  2019/03/16

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Touch	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber（Front） Q4

  Recommend rubber（Back） VERTICAL 20

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  10