NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  CYBERSHAPE WOOD CWT

  

  I was worried about it flying too much, so I picked the wood model instead of a carbon one, but
  maybe because of the rubber I put on, it flies more than I expected on flat hits for a 5-ply blade, more than the maker's spec sheet would suggest.
  (About on par with something like Nittaku Acoustic, maybe.)
  The weight sits toward the tip, the sweet spot is wide, and the grip is on the thin side, so serves and pushes get a lot of spin.
  It doesn't make much of a visual impression, but once I used it I thought, "oh, this is a good blade."
  I've only hit with the included 3g magnet weight installed at the grip end, so
  I'm planning to try changing that and comment again later.

  See original review Hide original review

  飛び過ぎを気にしてカーボンではなく、ウッドのモデルを選んだが
  貼ったラバーの影響か、５枚合板やメーカーカタログ値にしては意外とミート時に飛ぶ。
  (ニッタク・アコーステック等くらいかな)
  先端に重心が有り、スイートスポットも広くグリップも細めでサーブ、ツッツキは回転量が多い。
  見た目のインパクトより、使ってみて「あ、良いラケット」と思った。
  付属のマグネットウエイトは３gをグリップエンドに入れた状態でしか打っていないので
  今後、変更して 後日またコメントしようと思う。

  2023/07/18

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Touch	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber(Front) V>22 Double Extra

  Recommend rubber(Back) V>20 Double Extra

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4