NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  CYBERSHAPE WOOD CWT

  

  I chose a wood model instead of carbon because I was worried about flying too much.
  Perhaps due to the effect of the attached rubber, it flies unexpectedly at the time of meat for 5 plywood and the manufacturer's catalog value.
  (Nittaku, Acoustic, etc.)
  There is a center of gravity at the tip, the sweet spot is wide, the grip is narrow, and the serve and Tsutsuki have a large amount of rotation.
  I thought "Oh, a good racket" after using it from the impact of appearance.
  Since the attached magnet weight is only struck with 3g in the grip end
  In the future, I will change it and comment again at a later date.

  See original review Hide original review

  飛び過ぎを気にしてカーボンではなく、ウッドのモデルを選んだが
  貼ったラバーの影響か、５枚合板やメーカーカタログ値にしては意外とミート時に飛ぶ。
  (ニッタク・アコーステック等くらいかな)
  先端に重心が有り、スイートスポットも広くグリップも細めでサーブ、ツッツキは回転量が多い。
  見た目のインパクトより、使ってみて「あ、良いラケット」と思った。
  付属のマグネットウエイトは３gをグリップエンドに入れた状態でしか打っていないので
  今後、変更して 後日またコメントしようと思う。

  2023/07/18

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Touch	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber（Front） V>22 Double Extra

  Recommend rubber（Back） V>20 Double Extra

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1