NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  Q power

  

  This is a correction to a previous highly rated review.
  After using it for a while, I found it difficult to rotate the serve and the control was unstable, so I stopped using it.
  At first, I thought it was good because of the momentum of the ball, but...
  In the end, the winner went to the Tenergy system.
  In doubles, if I make a low rotation serve (maybe it's partly due to my technique), I'm easily paid off and pushed off the course.
  With Tenergy, that was not the case at all... Perhaps because the seat is hard, it's difficult to rotate the serve, which is beyond my skill.
  Now it is back with Tenergy 25. As expected. I think I'll try 64 in the future.
  For the time being, Mizuno's rubber is... I'm sorry.

  See original review Hide original review

  以前の高評価口コミ訂正です。
  その後使い込んだ結果、サーブの回転がかけづらく、コントロールも定まらないので使用をやめました。
  最初はボールの勢いもあって良いように思ったのですが・・・。
  結局、テナジー系に軍配が上がりました。
  ダブルスで下回転サーブを出すと（私の技術の問題もあるのでしょうが）簡単に払われてコースを突かれてしまいます。
  テナジーだと全くそんなことは無かったのですが・・・。シートが堅いからかサーブの回転がかけにくく私の技術ではどうにも。
  今はテナジー25で復活。さすがです。今後64も試してみようと思います。
  もう当面ミズノのラバーは・・・。残念です。

  2023/12/23

  Overall	6/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	6
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little hard

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2