AHC7 PEN

Everyone's rating [Hardness] Pretty hard
[Performance] Speed and Spin are excellent.
AHC7 PEN

(Click to show big size)

Averages reviews points

  • Evaluation: 10 / 10
  • Number of review: 3
    • Speed: 10
    • Spin: 9.33
    • Control: 9

    Reviews of AHC7 PEN. Players who use Racket evaluate various points such as hardness, momentum, weight, item by item to worry, and feel at impact thoroughly.

    Specifications

    Price
    9,000 Yen(Include tax 9,900 Yen)
    Producer
    Armstrong
    Product code
    912
    Weight
    ±
    Material
    Wood, Other, 7 ply wood
    Thickness
    6.5mm
    Customer Reviews SummaryAI Summary
    High basic performance and speed feel are well-evaluated, while a 0.5mm difference in board thickness significantly affects individual grip styles. Through customization to suit personal preferences, this racket demonstrates clear performance superiority over beginner models.
    ■ Frequently Mentioned Points
    • Excellent speed and spin with stable hitting feel
    • Board thickness of just 0.5mm greatly affects grip comfort and load
    • Round type offers good ball release for front court rapid attacks
    • Grip customization enables optimal feel for individual players
    ■ Representative Voices
    ▲ PositiveSignificant speed increase and excellent control. The good ball release enables easy counter-attacks with punch smashes and power drives, with front court rapid attacks showing further potential.
    ▽ CriticalNo notable critical comments

    User reviews

    • Kensuke

      Kensuke [Compared to the 33] Max-thickness, no-inverted-rubber close-table speed attack Verified Purchase

      Player reviews

      [Bought this round-handle version in addition to the 33] Same rubber, Morrist SP max thickness.
      Completely different racket. I was shocked at the difference.
      Unlike the 33, which resonates in your hand, this one has a clean, quick release off the ball.
      A dramatic speed boost. And somehow the control, which I was worried about, actually improved too. Both snap smashes and power drives accelerate nicely, making countering easy. Even against a soft, floaty push, I can respond with an aimed backhand smash or a deep, sharply cut push. I no longer need half-hearted drives.
      With the 33, you start wanting a backhand penhold technique, but ditching that for this one might be the right call. This is a gem that makes me think close-to-the-table fast attack still has more in it.

      See original review

      2024/10/21
      Overall
      10/10
      Speed
      10
      Spin
      10
      Control
      9
      Touch
      10
      Hardness hard

      Recommended rubber (Forehand) MORISTO SP AX

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • Kensuke

      Kensuke [Later] [Compared to the 33] Max-thickness, no-inverted-rubber close-table speed attack Verified Purchase

      Player reviews

      I switched from the 33 to this racket and was enjoying it, but partway through practice I started feeling discomfort (pain) in my middle finger (I'm the type whose middle and ring fingers stay straight).
      Why, when the shaping is the same as the 33?
      The cause was that the blade was just 0.5mm thicker.
      I thought about how to fix it right away. In the end I peeled off the cork where my index finger touches, bringing the thickness down to the same 6mm as the 33, which solved the problem. *I deliberately left the thumb-side cork alone, factoring in the difference in flight and hitting angle.
      This gives me the exact same grip feel as the 33. I can swing with no discomfort or pain at all. ◉‿◉
      For practice against beginners I use the 33 for slower speed and no-knuckleball returns.
      For my own practice, I use this racket.

      See original review

      2024/10/23
      Overall
      10/10
      Speed
      10
      Spin
      8
      Control
      9
      Touch
      10
      Hardness hard

      Recommended rubber (Forehand) MORISTO SP AX

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • Kensuke

      Kensuke [Follow-up] [Compared to the 33] Max-thickness, no-inverted-rubber close-table speed attack Verified Purchase

      Player reviews

      Here's a follow-up.
      I'm able to hit with good rhythm, but...
      Even though the shaping, the back sheet, and the back finger anti-slip are all exactly the same as the 33, I had some discomfort and slight pain in my middle finger.
      Why? ...The cause turned out to be that the blade was 0.5mm thicker than the 33. That tiny 0.5mm difference put strain on my middle finger (since my middle and ring fingers are straight). After thinking it over about how to shave 0.5mm off, I decided to go ahead and shave down just the part of the cork where my index finger rests. (I left the cork on the thumb side alone — the angle there is right.)
      That solved the discomfort (strain). The grip feel is now exactly the same as the 33.
      For practice against beginners I still use the 33, since it has no knuckleball effect and lower speed, but for my own practice I can hit hard with this racket with no discomfort at all. It's become a racket I really enjoy.

      See original review

      2024/10/22
      Overall
      10/10
      Speed
      10
      Spin
      10
      Control
      9
      Touch
      10
      Hardness hard

      Recommended rubber (Forehand) MORISTO SP AX

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    Post a review

    Top Players

    Country

    Style