RUTIS REVO J
Everyone's rating |
[Hardness] Little hard [Performance] Speed and Control are excellent. |
Averages reviews points
- Speed:8.75
- Spin:7.5
- Control:8.25
-
Reviews of RUTIS REVO J. Players who use Racket evaluate various points such as hardness, momentum, weight, item by item to worry, and feel at impact thoroughly.
- Japanese pen
Specifications
- Producer
- Nittaku
- Product code
- NC-0200
- Speed
- Mid-first
- Touch
- hard
- Weight
- 75g ±
- Material
- 3 woods + 2 FE carbons
- Thickness
- 5.7mm
User reviews
-
-
Anonymous (Experience:4〜5 years)
-
It was a horse. I was very excited. However, because it is good, I always hit the drive stably. It's difficult to get up-to-date technology.
Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness little hard
-
-
-
Table mania (Experience:11〜20 years) The characteristics of the predecessor and the predecessor are halved
-
This type of pen holder racket is the third generation starting from CP548.
The first CP548 of the cell 38mm ball generation and the second rootis of the cell 40mm ball generation are three thin plywood of core paulownia.
Naturally, this racket came out when I thought that the manufacturer would come out with a third generation that is hard to be pushed because it is compatible with plastic balls.Personally, I thought that the thickness would be simply increased from the second generation to support plastic balls, but while the thickness was kept at a moderate 5.7 mm, the core material was changed.
Judging by the naked eye, I think the core of Rootis Revo is probably Ayouth.This halves the ambivalence peculiar to this series, which was in the first and second generations, that "the core has a mess, but the outer panel and carbon play a mess".
The back feeling of the impact of hitting the ball is also reduced, and what used to be a "racket that fits the front and sticks and is easy to convey your power" has become a rather ordinary "racket for intermediate and advanced players". I thought it was.I wonder if this will follow existing series users.
Well, Nittaku may not be aiming for that.Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness hard
Recommended rubber (Forehand) VO>102
Recommended rubber (Backhand) QUANTUMX PRO SOFT
-
-
-
Crazy middle (Experience:6〜10 years) The back side is easy to do
-
Since it has flexibility, it depends on the rubber combination, but the fore drive has the impression that it speeds up and sinks quite a bit.
The backhand on the back side is also easy to hit repeatedly, and when it comes to meetings, it has increased.
As for the serve, the surface is wide, so I think it is easy to adjust the change depending on where you hit the ball even with the same swing.
Originally, it was a conversion from a square single-sided Japanese pen, and I could not get used to the grip of the middle pen, so it is a racket of Don Pisha for me who wanted to use the back side.Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness little hard
Recommended rubber (Forehand) EVOLUTION MX-D
Recommended rubber (Backhand) V>15 Extra
-
-
-
Charmin (Experience:More than 20 years)
-
Originally I used a rectangular pen, but because of the shaving condition of the grip place, it did not stabilize when I was swinging, so it was difficult to serve, so I tried to round type roots revo J. It's easy to handle on board, and shorts are also very easy to do. Switching between the fore and the back can be done quickly, it is easy to correspond to the opponent's fast table tennis. Because the center of gravity is close at hand, it is hard to drive, but smash felt easy to do. Rosena (middle) is pasted now, but the speed is also fast.
Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness little hard
Recommended rubber (Forehand) ROZENA
-
Related racket
Racket
Producer
Grip
Review Ranking
Rubber
Producer
Type
-
Get the Amazon gift card at a Review!
20 points are added in the post. You can replace it by Amazon Gift Card worth $5.00 with 1000 points.