NO.1 table tennis review site

Reviews by user

• 

  Marumu （Experience：６〜１０ years） It ’s expensive, but it ’s bad.

  

  Overwhelming momentum at the fore hitting stage! And you can easily speed up even with a light hit! Since the seat is solid, you can hold the ball and it will fit stably! It takes a lot of rotation, but if it's just a seat, it's a little loose. If you bite into the rubber, you can hit a ball with a lot of speed and rotation, and even though it is deep and heavy, it is a god-like rubber that fits properly on the table. The hardness is 52.5, but it is not so hard and the sheet is soft and thin, so it is easy to enter the sponge and bite into the rubber! However, I thought that the ability of this rubber could not be maximized unless it was bitten and hit. If the loop is thin, it will be a very loose ball, so it is better to hold a sponge to get a ball that is difficult to pick up. Of all the tension rubbers I've used so far, this rubber is definitely the best performance. Those who are interested in it are expensive, but I recommend buying it.

  See original review Hide original review

  フォア打ちの段階で圧倒的弾み！そして軽打でも簡単にスピードが出せる！シートがしっかりしてるからボールを持てて安定して収まる！回転はかかるけどシートだけだとちょっと緩いかな。ラバーに噛めばエグいスピードと回転のかかったボールが打ててかつ深いし重いのにちゃんと台におさまる神のようなラバーです。硬度52.5だけどそこまで硬くなくてシートが柔らかくて薄い分スポンジに入りやすくてラバーに噛みやすい！でも食い込ませて打たないとこのラバーの能力は最大限に発揮できないと思いました。ループも薄くだととても緩い球になってしまうので少しスポンジまで持たせた方が変化が多い取りにくいボールも出せます。今まで使ってきたテンションラバーの中で間違いなくこのラバーは1番エグい性能だと言えますね。ぜひ気になっている方は高いですが買うことをオススメします。

  2021/09/24

  All	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use CYPRESS T-MAX

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  Hide SEED （Experience：More than ２０ years） Impressed by the good balance

  

  Shake back attack type
  Fore advanced, back intermediate level
  Currently using Fore Evolution MXD and Back Target Pro GT47
  After hitting for two days, both decided to change to DNA Platinum XH
  The reason for the change is that speed, stability, rotational force, and ease of technology (security) can be achieved at a high level.
  Comparing with the rubber used in the fore
  In terms of speed, there is Evolution MXD, but there is a sense of stability and fear of entering when hitting a ball.
  In terms of rotational force, Target Pro XD52.5 is better, but it gives a little sense of stability.
  The previous rubber was also good, but while I felt the advantages, I also felt the disadvantages.
  I personally think that the characteristic of DNA Platinum XH is that it has few drawbacks and many advantages.
  I am impressed that the back is easier to use than other rubbers for its high hardness.
  It's more powerful than the Target Pro GT47, so it's an intermediate level, but I'll change it for a while.
  There are many parts that I feel good about, and there are no drawbacks. This is my DNA Platinum XH.

  See original review Hide original review

  シェイク裏裏攻撃型
  フォア上級、バック中級レベル
  現在バック面にＤＮＡプラチナＸＨを使用
  スピード・安定感・回転力・技術のやりやすさ（安心感）が高次元でできる。
  以前はターゲットプロＧＴ４７を使用していました。
  使いやすさは変わらず、威力・回転量があがるので変更しました。
  フォア面でも気に入ってしばらく使っていたのですが、現在はエボリューションＭＸＤに戻しています。
  戻した理由は回転量と技術のやりやすさはあるのですが、回転量に慣れられるとラリーが長くなる傾向があり、決定力がエボリューションＭＸＤよりなかったのでフォアでは使用しなくなりました。
  ＤＮＡプラチナＸＨは硬度が高い中では非常に扱いやすいラバーです。
  硬度の柔らかいラバーを使用している方が、威力を出すために硬度の高いラバーを試すときに他の同硬度のラバーよりフィットしやすいラバーだと思います。

  2021/07/15

  All	10/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Hardness	Hard

  Racket recommended use REVOLDIA CNF

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  62

• 

  Meet each other （Experience：１１〜２０ years） Cutman long-awaited rubber

  

  I used it in the cut. From the conclusion, I think it will be the best piece for Hyundai Cutman. Needless to say, the attack power is high, and both rotation and speed are perfect. And although it is the main cut, I was honestly surprised that it fits well beyond my imagination from the momentum at the time of the attack. I originally used DNApro H 1.9, and I thought that this rubber with a sponge thickness of 2.3 would probably not be stable in cutting, but when I actually used it, it was easier to cut than I imagined, and over mistakes I didn't really care. The stability of the cut is not much different from when using DNAproH, and only the attack power is increased, which is a fairly good result. I don't think there are many rubbers that have both attack power and cut stability at such a high level.
  As a neck, the weight is heavy and the price is right. I am also wondering how long it will last. However, I think that it has the performance that is only expensive, and I think that it is a rubber that I would like people who are intermediate or above Cutman and those who are using the DNApro series to try it once.

  See original review Hide original review

  カットで使用しました。結論から言うと現代カットマンにとって最適な一枚になると思います。攻撃力は言うまでもなく高く、回転、スピード共に申し分ないです。そして本題のカットですが攻撃時の弾みからは想像つかないくらい収まりがよく、正直驚きました。自分は元々DNAproHの1.9を使用しており、スポンジ厚が2.3もあるこのラバーでは恐らくカットは安定しないだろうと思っていましたが、実際に使ってみると想像以上にカットがしやすく、オーバーミスも然程気にならなかったです。DNAproHを使用している時とカットの安定感はあまり変わらず、攻撃力だけが上がるというかなり良い結果になりました。攻撃力とカットの安定がここまで高いレベルで両立しているラバーは中々ないと思いますね。
  ネックとしては重量が重めなのと値段ですね。寿命がどれくらい持つのかも気になるところです。しかし値段が高いだけの性能はあると思いますし、中級者以上のカットマン、あとはDNAproシリーズを使用している人には一度は試してもらいたいラバーだと思います。

  2021/05/28

  All	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	10
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use DEFENSIVE CLASSIC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  10

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4

Related rubber

• 
  DNA PLATINUM M
• 
  DNA PLATINUM H
• 
  DNA PLATINUM S
• 
  AIROC S