NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  Zhang Jike ALC

  

  I used to use the Schlager Light, but between that and age-related wear, this blade has more bounce.
  That said, I had Sriver on the Schlager Light, so it's not really a fair comparison.
  (Though that's probably also related to the fact that I've got Tenergy on this blade this time.)
  I prefer the grip color on the ZLC version, but the ALC has plenty of bounce on its own.
  For reference, I had Tenergy 05 on the forehand and Tenergy 64 on the backhand, both in thick, for a total weight of 178.6 grams.

  See original review Hide original review

  前はシュラガー・ライト使ってましたが、経年劣化もあり、このラケットのほうが弾みます。
  ただし、シュラガーライトにはスレイバー張ってたのでちゃんと比較はできません。
  （今回のラケットにテナジーを張ってることも関係してるんでしょうが）
  グリップの色はＺＬＣのほうがいいんですけど、弾みはＡＬＣで十分です。
  ちなみに表にテナジー05、裏に64、両方とも厚で総重量は178.6グラムでした。

  2014/01/28

  Overall	5/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	5
  Control	5
  Touch	5

  Recommend rubber(Front) TENERGY 05

  Recommend rubber(Back) TENERGY 05

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  5

• 

  TENERGY 05

  

  As the title says, I switched to the max-thickness version.
  I played maybe 1-2 times a week, but after using it for about six months, the grip started feeling weak, so I replaced it.
  A brand new sheet really is completely different. Replacing it was the right call.
  That said, it's expensive..... but I don't want to risk trying other rubbers and having it not work out.
  It looks like the forehand side of this blade is going to settle on 05 max-thickness for a while.
  When swapping the rubber, it took me a while to throw away the trimmed-off scraps
  (I have no use for them, but it feels like such a waste)

  See original review Hide original review

  見出しの通り、トクアツへ変更しました。
  だいたい週1．2回程度でしたが六ヶ月ほど使用し、ひっかかりが弱く感じたため買い換えました。
  やはり新品は全然違いますね。交換して正解でした。
  ただ、値段が高い・・・・・しかし他のラバーを試して失敗したくはありません。
  このラケットのＦ面は05トクアツにしばらくおちつきそうです。
  ラバー交換の際、切り取った切れ端を捨てるのには時間がかかりました
  （使い道はありませんがもったいなくて）

  2014/05/22

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	7
  Control	7

  Recomend racket Zhang Jike ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  Tenergy 64

  

  It bounces more than the 05.
  The spin isn't quite as much as the 05, but it still gets a decent, proper amount.
  This is the first rubber I've used on my newly bought Zhang Jike ALC, so I'm planning to compare it against others going forward.
  (If you're using a bouncy blade, going with 05 on both sides could work too.)

  See original review Hide original review

  05よりも弾みます。
  回転は05ほどではありませんが、それなりちゃんとかかります。
  買い換えた張ALCの初のラバーなのでこれから比較してゆきたいと思ってます。
  （弾むラケットなら両面05でもありかなと）

  2014/01/28

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	5
  Control	8

  Recomend racket Zhang Jike ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  TENERGY 05

  

  For serves, it doesn't bounce as much as Tenergy 64 on my backhand and it takes spin well, so it's easy to use.
  I felt like 64 tends to produce serves that go too long.
  This is my first time pairing it with the Zhang Jike ALC, so I want to keep comparing from here.
  (The next rubber I'm considering is also from the Tenergy series)

  See original review Hide original review

  サーブはバック面のテナジー64ほど跳ねないし回転がかかるのでやりやすいです。
  64はロングサーブになりやすいと感じました。
  張ALCとのはじめての組み合わせなのでこれから比較してゆきたいと思ってます。
  （次の検討中のラバーもテナジーシリーズです）

  2014/01/28

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	7
  Control	7

  Recomend racket Zhang Jike ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0