NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  Sriver EL

  

  At one sports shop, this rubber seems to be their top pick for beginners.
  It's cheap, easy to use, and I think the performance is just right for beginners.
  Before tension rubbers came out, this was popular even among advanced players back then.

  See original review Hide original review

  あるスポーツ店では、このラバーは初心者にイチオシみたいです。
  安いし、使いやすく、性能も初心者には、ちょうどいいと思います。
  テンション系が出るまでは、当時、上級者でも、このラバーは人気がありました。

  2015/06/25

  Overall	5/10
  Speed	5
  Spin	4
  Control	9

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  Tenergy 25

  

  Today I happened to be talking rubbers with some table tennis friends, and we agreed on the topic of Tenergy.
  Because Tenergy is expensive, I'd been looking for all kinds of alternatives up until now...
  But in the end we came to the conclusion that no rubber really beats Tenergy's performance.
  I guess it's expensive for a reason...
  Of course there are rubbers with great value for money (great cost performance relative to price), and it also depends on a person's playing style, preferences, level, and so on...
  But when it just comes down to pure rubber performance, we ended up agreeing that nothing really beats Tenergy.
  We just happened to be thinking the same thing at the same time, so I figured I'd leave a comment.

  See original review Hide original review

  今日たまたま卓球仲間とラバーの話になって、「テナジ―の話で同感だった」
  テナジ―は高いから、今まで、いろんな代替え品を探して来たが・・・
  やっぱりテナジ―の性能を越えるラバーは結局存在しない・・・という結論になった。
  やっぱり高価なだけあると・・・。
  もちろん値段の割に性能がいいラバー（コストパフォーマンスに優れる）や、その人のプレースタイルや、好み、レベルなど、いろんな要素はあると思いますが・・・。
  単純に、ラバー性能の話だけになると、やっぱりテナジ―に勝るラバーはないなって事になりました。
  たまたま、同じタイミングで同じ事、考えてたので、コメントしました。

  2015/06/17

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	10
  Control	8

  Recomend racket SENKOH SPECIAL 90

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  Timo Boll W5

  

  It's well balanced, so I'd recommend it to beginners and the like.
  My daughter is currently using it, and her overhits and small mistakes, like on pushes, have gone down, so she's able to play more consistently in matches now.

  See original review Hide original review

  バランスにすぐれていて、初心者などにオススメします。
  現在、娘が使用していますが、オーバーミスや、細かいツッツキなどの凡ミスが減り、試合で安定したプレーが出来るようになりました。

  2015/06/13

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	5
  Spin	5
  Control	8
  Touch	4

  Recommend rubber(Front) Roundell

  Recommend rubber(Back) Rakza 7 Soft

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  Tenergy 25

  

  Anyway, fine short-game plays are easy with this, and aside from tacky rubbers I think it's the best for spin.
  It's also a perfect match for penhold fast-attack players close to the table.
  You land service aces and speed drives to a hilariously good degree.
  That said, it's a bit heavy.
  It's also pricey, so I'm not using it right now.

  See original review Hide original review

  とにかく、台上の細かいプレーはやり易く、回転も粘着以外なら最高だと思います。
  前陣速攻のペンホルダーにも相性バッチリです。
  おもしろいくらい、サービスエース、スピードドライブが決まります。
  ただ、少し重いです。
  値段が高いので、今は使っていません。

  2015/06/11

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	8

  Recomend racket SENKOH SPECIAL 90

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  Rakza 7

  

  When it comes down to it, 7 or 7 Soft is the way to go.
  I tried the 9 and the X too, but 7 felt like it performed the best.
  I guess 7 for forehand, 7 Soft for backhand.
  For spin-oriented players who like pushes and drives, I think these are a perfect fit.

  See original review Hide original review

  やっぱり７か７ソフトですね。
  ９とかＸも使ってみましたが、７が一番性能が良い気がしました。
  ７がフォア、７ソフトがバックですかね～。
  ツッツキ、ドライブなどの回転系プレーヤーには、バッチリ使いやすいと思います。

  2015/06/10

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	8

  Recomend racket ALLROUND EVOLUTION

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. 5
7. 6
8. 7
9. Next >