NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  Rakza 7

  

  I felt that the biggest feature is that any technology is easy to do.
  Unlike tension, because it flew only with the added force, the attack was a strange feeling that the attack quickly took place, but the ball that was spinning flew away.
  We are satisfied with the amount of rotation such as serve.

  If we mention the disadvantage, is it that people who are not confident of the impact are likely to take away?
  I fought hard as I did not fly as I thought when I fell down.
  I think that it would be better to choose those who like software.

  See original review Hide original review

  どんな技術もやりやすい、というのが最大の特徴だと感じました。
  テンションとは違い、力を加えたぶんだけ飛ぶため、台上はしっかり収まるのに攻撃はしっかり速くて回転のかかったボールが出るという不思議な感覚でした。
  サーブなどの回転量も満足しています。

  デメリットを挙げるとすれば、インパクトに自信のない人は持て余してしまいそうという点でしょうか。
  私自身も下がったときに思うように飛ばず苦戦しました。
  そういった方はソフトの方を選ぶのがいいと思います。

  2018/05/15

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	10
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket Kenta Matsudaira ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  6

• 

  VO＞102

  

  I used 1.8 in the back. Please consider the numbers as "as a table".

  First of all, as you all say, it will take a lot of rotation. Drive, Tsutsuki, serve, whether amount of rotation of the table or not, can make a mistake by inviting you.
  Meat strike is also easy to do, but it took a while to get used to it because of the strong momentum. If you get used to it, it demonstrates unrivaled performance on the attack surface.

  Blocks are easy to do, but it is difficult to put a knuckle that appears like a table. We do not recommend those who want such ball quality.
  There is also an opinion that it is easy to turn from the backside, but I do not recommend it for those who turn around personally soon. It will be halfway play which can not take both the table and the back, and it is very unfriendly. I think that it is better to think about use after accustoming it with a table with less habit.

  See original review Hide original review

  バックに1.8を使用。数字は"表として"でお考えください。

  まず、みなさん言われるようにとても回転がかかります。ドライブやツッツキ、サーブで表の回転量だろうと油断させてミスを誘うことができます。
  ミート打ちもやりやすいですが、弾みが強いため慣れるのに少し時間がかかりました。慣れれば、攻撃面で文句ない性能を発揮してくれます。

  ブロックはやりやすいのですが、表らしいナックルを出すのは難しいです。そういった球質を求める方にはおすすめしません。
  また、裏から転向しやすいという意見もありますが、個人的に転向してすぐの方には勧めません。表とも裏ともとれない中途半端なプレーになってしまいますし、それはとても勿体ないです。それよりは、クセの少ない表で慣らしてから、使用を考えるのがいいと思います。

  2018/05/06

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	10
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Kenta Matsudaira ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  Kenta Matsudaira ALC

  

  At first I tried to buy Timorbol ALC, but the grip did not fit. I heard that the material of the blade itself is the same as Timobol and so I just got hooked when I took it.

  I think that narrow grip is still the biggest feature.
  I would like to recommend it to those who are small like hands or those who change their possession with a fore and a back.
  In addition, the performance is like origami because the material is the same as Timobol. I thought that the platform is difficult because it is outer, but since the operability is superior to Timo it can be used without problems.
  Also, because the weight is also relatively light in the outer, I would like to encourage table software users who feel that it is too heavy for 7 sheets.

  See original review Hide original review

  最初はティモボルALCを買おうとしたけれどグリップが合わず。ブレードの材質自体はティモボルと同じと聞いたのでこちらを持ってみたところぴったりハマりました。

  やはり細めのグリップが最大の特徴だと思います。
  自分のように手が小さめの方やフォアとバックで持ち方を変えている方におすすめしたいです。
  また、材質がティモボルと同じということで性能は折り紙つきです。アウターなので台上が難しいかと思いましたが、操作性がティモより勝っているので問題なく使えています。
  また、重量もアウターの中では比較的軽めなので7枚だと重すぎると感じている表ソフトユーザーにも勧めたいです。

  2018/05/13

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber（Front） Tenergy 64

  Recommend rubber（Back） VO＞102

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  3

• 

  Tenergy 64

  

  While I was suffering from the rubber on the fore side all the time, I bought it with my heart.
  Up to now, I tried rosena, 01stiff, rakuza 7, etc., but none of them had anything unsatisfactory. 64 is the impression that it was resolved.

  Speed ​​is as to the touch, no complaints. It is said that rotation is hard to apply, but it is only in the context of tenazi. It is the same as or higher than the three rubbers tried so far.

  The attack surface tends to be evaluated, but the block was quite likable. If the points are perfectly matched, you will see a fast block like a counter. Also, the platform is easier to work with than ever thought.

  As a precaution, the strength of momentum is to increase over at first. I think that there is no problem if you find even the point where you can successfully enter the angle and the size of the swing. I will endure it.

  See original review Hide original review

  フォア面のラバーにずっと悩んでいるなか、思いきって買ってみました。
  これまでは、ロゼナ、01stiff、ラクザ7などを試していましたが、どれも何かしらの物足りなさがありました。64はそれが解消された印象です。

  スピードは触れ込み通り、文句なしです。回転はかかりにくいとも言われますが、あくまでテナジーの中ではの話です。これまで試した3ラバーと同じかそれ以上です。

  攻撃面が評価されがちですが、ブロックもかなり好感触でした。打点がぴったり合えばカウンターのような速いブロックが出ます。また、台上も思ったより弾まずやりやすいです。

  注意点としては弾みの強さで最初はオーバーが増えることです。角度やスイングの大きさなど上手く入るポイントさえ見つければ問題ないと思います。それまでの我慢です。

  2018/05/06

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	8
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Kenta Matsudaira ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0