NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  Rakza 7

  

  I felt like the biggest strength of this rubber is that every technique feels easy to pull off.
  Unlike tension rubbers, the ball only flies as much as the force you put into it, so it was a strange feeling — it stays under control on the short game, but when you attack, you still get fast, spinny shots.
  I'm also satisfied with the amount of spin you get on serves and the like.

  If I had to name a downside, it's that people who aren't confident in their impact might find it hard to handle.
  I struggled myself when playing further from the table, since the ball wouldn't fly the way I wanted.
  For players like that, I think going with the Soft version is the better choice.

  See original review Hide original review

  どんな技術もやりやすい、というのが最大の特徴だと感じました。
  テンションとは違い、力を加えたぶんだけ飛ぶため、台上はしっかり収まるのに攻撃はしっかり速くて回転のかかったボールが出るという不思議な感覚でした。
  サーブなどの回転量も満足しています。

  デメリットを挙げるとすれば、インパクトに自信のない人は持て余してしまいそうという点でしょうか。
  私自身も下がったときに思うように飛ばず苦戦しました。
  そういった方はソフトの方を選ぶのがいいと思います。

  2018/05/15

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	10
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket Kenta Matsudaira ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  6

• 

  VO＞102

  

  I use 1.8mm on my backhand. Please keep in mind these numbers are relative to short pips.

  First of all, as everyone says, it puts on a lot of spin. With drives, pushes, and serves, you can catch opponents off guard - they let their guard down thinking "it's just short pips spin" - and force mistakes.
  Meet-hitting is easy too, but the bounce is strong, so it took me a little while to get used to it. Once you're used to it, it delivers performance you can't complain about on the attacking side.

  Blocking is easy, but it's hard to produce that classic short-pips knuckle ball. I wouldn't recommend it if that's the kind of ball quality you're after.
  Some people also say it's an easy transition from inverted rubber, but personally I wouldn't recommend it to someone who just switched. You end up in this awkward in-between style that's neither short pips nor inverted, and that's a real waste. I think it's better to get used to a short pips rubber with fewer quirks first, and consider this one after that.

  See original review Hide original review

  バックに1.8を使用。数字は"表として"でお考えください。

  まず、みなさん言われるようにとても回転がかかります。ドライブやツッツキ、サーブで表の回転量だろうと油断させてミスを誘うことができます。
  ミート打ちもやりやすいですが、弾みが強いため慣れるのに少し時間がかかりました。慣れれば、攻撃面で文句ない性能を発揮してくれます。

  ブロックはやりやすいのですが、表らしいナックルを出すのは難しいです。そういった球質を求める方にはおすすめしません。
  また、裏から転向しやすいという意見もありますが、個人的に転向してすぐの方には勧めません。表とも裏ともとれない中途半端なプレーになってしまいますし、それはとても勿体ないです。それよりは、クセの少ない表で慣らしてから、使用を考えるのがいいと思います。

  2018/05/06

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	10
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Kenta Matsudaira ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  Kenta Matsudaira ALC

  

  At first I was going to buy a Timo Boll ALC, but the grip didn't suit me. I'd heard the blade material itself is the same as the Timo Boll, so I picked this one up instead, and it fit perfectly.

  I'd say the thinner grip is definitely the biggest feature.
  I'd recommend it to people with smaller hands like myself, or people who change their grip between forehand and backhand.
  Also, since the material is the same as the Timo Boll, the performance is guaranteed. Being an outer blade, I thought the short game might be tough, but the control is actually better than the Timo Boll, so I've had no problems.
  Also, since the weight is relatively light for an outer blade, I'd recommend it to short pips users who feel a 7-ply blade is too heavy.

  See original review Hide original review

  最初はティモボルALCを買おうとしたけれどグリップが合わず。ブレードの材質自体はティモボルと同じと聞いたのでこちらを持ってみたところぴったりハマりました。

  やはり細めのグリップが最大の特徴だと思います。
  自分のように手が小さめの方やフォアとバックで持ち方を変えている方におすすめしたいです。
  また、材質がティモボルと同じということで性能は折り紙つきです。アウターなので台上が難しいかと思いましたが、操作性がティモより勝っているので問題なく使えています。
  また、重量もアウターの中では比較的軽めなので7枚だと重すぎると感じている表ソフトユーザーにも勧めたいです。

  2018/05/13

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber(Front) Tenergy 64

  Recommend rubber(Back) VO＞102

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  3

• 

  Tenergy 64

  

  I'd been struggling to find the right forehand rubber for a long time, so I finally took the plunge and bought this.
  Up until now I'd tried Rozena, 01 Stiff, Rakza 7, and others, but they all left me feeling something was missing. With the 64, that feeling was resolved.

  The speed lives up to the hype, no complaints there. People say it's hard to get spin on, but that's only true relative to other Tenergy rubbers — it's on par with, or better than, the three rubbers I mentioned above.

  People tend to focus on how good it is for attacking, but the blocking felt really good too. If you catch the ball at just the right point, you get counter-like fast blocks. Also, in the short game it doesn't bounce as much as I expected, which makes it easy to handle.

  One thing to watch out for is that because of the strong bounce, you'll hit a lot of balls long at first. Once you find the right angle and swing size, though, it shouldn't be a problem — it just takes some patience to get there.

  See original review Hide original review

  フォア面のラバーにずっと悩んでいるなか、思いきって買ってみました。
  これまでは、ロゼナ、01stiff、ラクザ7などを試していましたが、どれも何かしらの物足りなさがありました。64はそれが解消された印象です。

  スピードは触れ込み通り、文句なしです。回転はかかりにくいとも言われますが、あくまでテナジーの中ではの話です。これまで試した3ラバーと同じかそれ以上です。

  攻撃面が評価されがちですが、ブロックもかなり好感触でした。打点がぴったり合えばカウンターのような速いブロックが出ます。また、台上も思ったより弾まずやりやすいです。

  注意点としては弾みの強さで最初はオーバーが増えることです。角度やスイングの大きさなど上手く入るポイントさえ見つければ問題ないと思います。それまでの我慢です。

  2018/05/06

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	8
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Kenta Matsudaira ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0