NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  Q4

  

  The first impression of striking Q4 was thought that shot feeling was considerably stiff, it might be a feeling of shot that is close to sticky rubber. However, the point that differs from sticky rubber is the point where the ball separation is fast. Since spherical separation is good, I thought that rotation was not applied so much, but it took me considerably. I think that it is the top class in the spin tension system. Since it fly to the partner court with drawing a slightly arched line than Q3 of the previous work, it is easy to strike for a feeling of hard feeling of shot and speed comes out. The best thing about this rubber is a cut strike. You can forcefully bring a floating cut with meat. I think that Fortius FT and inner system racket are good as a racket to be fitted because it is a rigid rubber.

  See original review Hide original review

  Q4を打っての第一印象は打球感がかなり硬めと思いました、粘着ラバーに近い打球感かも知れません。しかし粘着ラバーと違う点は球離れが速い点です。球離れが良いから回転はそれほどかかっていない思いましたが、相当かかっています。スピンテンション系ではトップクラスだと思います。前作のQ3よりもやや弧線を描いて相手コートに飛ぶので硬めの打球感の割に打ちやすくスピードも出ます。このラバーで最も良かったのはカット打ちです。浮いたカットを強引にミートでもっていけます。何分硬めのラバーですので合わせるラケットとしてはフォルティウスFTやインナー系のラケットが良いと思います。

  2018/09/15

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	10
  Control	7
  Hardness	Hard

  Recomend racket Forutiusu FT

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  Forutiusu FT

  

  It is a racket which is used by Oshima players of the world representative, and many players of college students use it, which is one of the criteria in the plastic ball. I think that many people have suffered from being pushed by the ball instead of a cell or being difficult to rotate, but Fortius FT is unlikely to do anything like driving, meat system, battle technology, counters, etc. We can use tension system and adhesive rubber, table software, price is also affordable so if you are an offensive player you can say that it's a good racket to use once. The only difficulty is that the racket is heavy. And seven plywood-like heavier individuals will fly. The shot feeling was exquisite because I chose it as hardened because there was no choice.

  See original review Hide original review

  世界代表の大島選手が使っていたり、大学生のプレイヤーも多く使用していて、プラボールにおける基準の１つになるラケットです。セルからプラに変わってボールに押されたり、あるいは回転がかけにくかったりと悩んだ方も多いと思いますが、フォルティウスFTはドライブやミート系、台上技術、カウンターなどやりにくいことがありません。テンション系や粘着ラバー、表ソフトも使えて、値段もお手頃なので攻撃選手なら一度は使っていいラケットだと言えます。唯一の難点はラケットが重めであること。そして7枚合板らしく重めの個体の方が飛びます。打球感は選択肢が無かったので硬めを選びましたが、ミドルだと思います。

  2018/09/15

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	10
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber（Front） SUPER VENTUS

  Recommend rubber（Back） VO>103

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  HYBRID K1J

  

  We were worried about review in net and table tennis kingdom and purchased. Transfer from Super Ventas. I think that the first impression I struck is pretty much as a sticky rubber, I think it's a little bit harder than a spin tension rubber. Rotation is precious. Both service and drive were evaluated as being sticky. The drive changes naturally and is difficult to take. The table stops and flicking is easy. The weak point is quite heavy. The package was 112g, but the weight after cutting is about 55g. Is it about this weight for a 52 degree rubber? If you are more than intermediate, you can do one attack technique. It is a good rubber that can send difficult balls to your opponent if you can overcome the risk of weight.

  See original review Hide original review

  ネットや卓球王国でのレビューが気になり購入しました。スーパーヴェンタスからの乗り換えになります。打った第一印象は粘着ラバーとしてはかなり弾む方だと思います、スピンテンションラバーと比べるとちょっとだけ弾まない位だと思います。回転は流石です。サービス、ドライブ共に粘着らしく相当かかっていると評価を受けました。ドライブはナチュラルに変化し、取りづらいとのこと。台上も止まったり、フリックもやり易いです。弱点としてはかなり重いことです。パッケージ112gでしたが、カット後の重量は53gほどです。52度のラバーだとこれくらいの重さですかね。中級者以上でしたら攻撃技術は一通りこなせます。重さというリスクを越えられれば、取りづらいボールを相手に送れる良ラバーです。後に投稿したブルーグリップV1との比較もしましたので、そちらも良ければ見て下さい。

  2019/08/25

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	10
  Control	8
  Hardness	Hard

  Recomend racket Forutiusu FT

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  SYMMETRY HARD VERSION

  

  This is a review of the medium to medium thickness back face. It doesn't fly as well as the German face, but you can adjust the flight yourself.
  Compared to the Moristo SP

  Speed Moristo SP ≧ Symme Hard
  Rotation Moristo SP = Symme Hard
  Knuckle Moristo SP ≧ Symme Hard
  Stability Moristo SP ≦ Symme Hard
  Lightness Moristo SP < Symme Hard

  It's like a Moristo SP that's lighter and more stable.
  You can flip it over and hit it with a forehand face, and it's hard enough to stop blocks.
  It's easy to hit knuckles and the price is reasonable, so if you use a vertical speed face, I think it's worth buying at least once.

  See original review Hide original review

  厚さは中、中厚でバック表でのレビューです。ドイツ表程の飛びはありませんが、自分で調整出来る飛び具合です。
  モリストSPとの比較をすると

  スピード　モリストSP≧シンメハード
  回転　 モリストSP=シンメハード
  ナックル　モリストSP≧シンメハード
  安定性　　モリストSP≦シンメハード
  軽さ　　　モリストSP&lt;シンメハード

  軽めにして安定性を出したモリストSPというイメージです。
  反転してフォア表でも打てますし、硬さもあるのでブロックも止まります。
  ナックルも出し易く値段もリーズナブルなので、縦目スピード系表を使う方なら一度は買って良いと思います。

  2025/06/21

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	7
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket AQUA BLADE α

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

• 

  bluestar A2

  

  The problem is the price and hardness.
  This review was done using an adhesive protective sheet.
  It requires up and down rotation techniques such as service and drive, and the ball flies and counters perfectly when it hits the core.
  I think the lifespan is average for a German rubber. I used it with seven pieces of wood, and it is a fairly hard rubber that is difficult to use without the appropriate technique and amount of practice.
  There is also a slightly softer A3, but I think it is difficult to buy a 47.5 degree rubber at this high price.
  I think it is good for national level players and regular winners of open tournaments, but from a cost-performance perspective, it is a good rubber that is difficult to use continuously.

  See original review Hide original review

  ネックになるのは値段と硬さ、
  粘着保護シートを使ってのレビューになります。
  サービスやドライブなどの上下回転系の技術もかかりますし、芯に当たった時の飛びやカウンターも申し分無く良いボールが行きます。
  寿命は平均的なドイツラバーだと思います。木材七枚で使いましたが、まあまあ硬めで相応の技術や練習量が無いと使いこなすのは難しいラバーです。
  少し柔らかいA3もありますが、47.5度のラバーをこの高値で買うのも難点かと思います。
  全国レベルの選手やオープン大会入賞常連の方が使うのは良いと思いますが、コスパ面から考えると、継続使用は悩ましい良ラバーです。

  2025/06/21

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	10
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket AQUA BLADE α

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. Next >