NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• SUPER VENTUS

  

  I was curious about the high ratings online, and since it was on sale I picked up the max thickness version. My impression after using it is that it's easy to handle, and even though it's easy to handle, you can still hit high-quality balls with it. It had been a while since I used a TSP or VICTAS inverted rubber, but I didn't find anything hard about the attacking side — topspin drives were easy to hit, the arc was good, and smash/meet-style shots worked fine too. Out of all the rubbers I've used, it feels like a slightly lighter version of the Omega V Tour DF with a bit more spin and speed. It's definitely worth trying at least once.

  See original review Hide original review

  ネットでの高評価が気になり、セールをしていたので特厚を購入しました。使った印象は扱い易いこと、そして扱い易いのに質が高いボールが打てることです。TSP、VICTASの裏ソフトは久しぶりに使いましたが、ドライブの打ちやすさ、弧線、スマッシュなどのミート系技術など攻撃技術でやりにくいことはありませんでした。今まで使ったラバーではオメガV ツアーDFをほんの少しだけ軽くして、スピンとスピードを底上げしたラバーだと思えます。一度試してみる価値はありますよ。

  2019/03/01

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket Forutiusu FT

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  Q4

  

  My first impression hitting with Q4 was that the feel on contact is quite hard — maybe close to the feel of a tacky rubber. But unlike a tacky rubber, the ball leaves the sheet fast. Because the ball releases so quickly I assumed it wasn't putting on that much spin, but it actually grabs quite a lot. I'd put it at the top tier among spin tension rubbers. Compared to the previous Q3, it flies to the opponent's court with a slightly higher arc, so despite the hard feel, it's easy to hit with and produces speed too. What I liked best about this rubber was hitting against chops. You can forcefully meet a floating chop and put it away. Since it's on the harder side, I think it pairs well with blades like the Fortius FT or other inner-carbon-type blades.

  See original review Hide original review

  Q4を打っての第一印象は打球感がかなり硬めと思いました、粘着ラバーに近い打球感かも知れません。しかし粘着ラバーと違う点は球離れが速い点です。球離れが良いから回転はそれほどかかっていない思いましたが、相当かかっています。スピンテンション系ではトップクラスだと思います。前作のQ3よりもやや弧線を描いて相手コートに飛ぶので硬めの打球感の割に打ちやすくスピードも出ます。このラバーで最も良かったのはカット打ちです。浮いたカットを強引にミートでもっていけます。何分硬めのラバーですので合わせるラケットとしてはフォルティウスFTやインナー系のラケットが良いと思います。

  2018/09/15

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	10
  Control	7
  Hardness	Hard

  Recomend racket Forutiusu FT

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  Forutiusu FT

  

  National team player Oshima uses this blade, and a lot of college players use it too — it's become one of the benchmark blades for the plastic ball era. A lot of people struggled with getting pushed around by the ball or having trouble putting spin on it after the switch from celluloid to plastic balls, but with the Fortius FT there's nothing that feels hard to do — topspin drives, hitting, the short game, counters, none of it gives you trouble. It works fine with tension rubbers, tacky rubbers, and short pips too, and the price is reasonable, so I'd say any attacking player should try it at least once. The one downside is that the blade is on the heavy side, and being a 7-ply, the heavier individual blades tend to fly better. There wasn't a choice for the feel so I picked the harder one, but I'd call it medium.

  See original review Hide original review

  世界代表の大島選手が使っていたり、大学生のプレイヤーも多く使用していて、プラボールにおける基準の１つになるラケットです。セルからプラに変わってボールに押されたり、あるいは回転がかけにくかったりと悩んだ方も多いと思いますが、フォルティウスFTはドライブやミート系、台上技術、カウンターなどやりにくいことがありません。テンション系や粘着ラバー、表ソフトも使えて、値段もお手頃なので攻撃選手なら一度は使っていいラケットだと言えます。唯一の難点はラケットが重めであること。そして7枚合板らしく重めの個体の方が飛びます。打球感は選択肢が無かったので硬めを選びましたが、ミドルだと思います。

  2018/09/15

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	10
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber(Front) SUPER VENTUS

  Recommend rubber(Back) VO>103

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  SYMMETRY HARD VERSION

  

  This is a review of the medium/medium-thick thickness on backhand short pips. It doesn't fly as much as German short pips, but the amount of bounce is something you can adjust yourself.
  Comparing it to Morrist SP:

  Speed: Morrist SP ≥ Symme Hard
  Spin: Morrist SP = Symme Hard
  Knuckle: Morrist SP ≥ Symme Hard
  Stability: Morrist SP ≤ Symme Hard
  Lightness: Morrist SP < Symme Hard

  My impression is that this is a lighter version of Morrist SP with more stability added.
  You can flip it and hit with it as forehand short pips too, and since it has some hardness, blocks stop well.
  It's also easy to produce knuckle balls and the price is reasonable, so I think it's worth buying at least once if you use vertical-pip speed-oriented short pips.

  See original review Hide original review

  厚さは中、中厚でバック表でのレビューです。ドイツ表程の飛びはありませんが、自分で調整出来る飛び具合です。
  モリストSPとの比較をすると

  スピード　モリストSP≧シンメハード
  回転　 モリストSP=シンメハード
  ナックル　モリストSP≧シンメハード
  安定性　　モリストSP≦シンメハード
  軽さ　　　モリストSP&lt;シンメハード

  軽めにして安定性を出したモリストSPというイメージです。
  反転してフォア表でも打てますし、硬さもあるのでブロックも止まります。
  ナックルも出し易く値段もリーズナブルなので、縦目スピード系表を使う方なら一度は買って良いと思います。

  2025/06/21

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	7
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket AQUA BLADE α

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  HYBRID K1J

  

  I was curious after seeing reviews online and in Table Tennis Kingdom magazine, so I bought it. I switched over from Super Ventus. My first impression hitting with it was that, for a tacky rubber, it bounces quite a bit - just a bit less than a spin-tension rubber, I'd say. The spin is excellent, as expected. Both my serves and drives got praised as having strong, characteristically tacky spin on them. My drives apparently curve naturally and are hard for opponents to read. Short-game shots stop well, and flicks are easy to do too. The downside is that it's quite heavy - the package said 112g, but after cutting it down it weighed around 53g. I guess that's about right for a 52-degree rubber. Intermediate players and above should be able to handle the full range of attacking techniques with it. If you can get past the weight risk, it's a great rubber that lets you send your opponent balls that are hard to handle. I also posted a comparison with the Blue Grip V1 afterward, so please check that out too if you're interested.

  See original review Hide original review

  ネットや卓球王国でのレビューが気になり購入しました。スーパーヴェンタスからの乗り換えになります。打った第一印象は粘着ラバーとしてはかなり弾む方だと思います、スピンテンションラバーと比べるとちょっとだけ弾まない位だと思います。回転は流石です。サービス、ドライブ共に粘着らしく相当かかっていると評価を受けました。ドライブはナチュラルに変化し、取りづらいとのこと。台上も止まったり、フリックもやり易いです。弱点としてはかなり重いことです。パッケージ112gでしたが、カット後の重量は53gほどです。52度のラバーだとこれくらいの重さですかね。中級者以上でしたら攻撃技術は一通りこなせます。重さというリスクを越えられれば、取りづらいボールを相手に送れる良ラバーです。後に投稿したブルーグリップV1との比較もしましたので、そちらも良ければ見て下さい。

  2019/08/25

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	10
  Control	8
  Hardness	Hard

  Recomend racket Forutiusu FT

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. Next >