VO>103

Everyone's rating [Hardness] Little soft
[Performance] Speed and Control to have excellent
VO>103

(Click to zoom the photo)

Averages reviews points

  • Rating: 8.08 / 10
  • 13 reviews
    • Speed:8.46
    • Spin:6.46
    • Control:7.46

    Reviews of VO>103. Players who use Rubber evaluate various points such as hardness of the sponge, speed, control, spin, and feel at impact thoroughly.

    • Short pimples

    Specifications

    Producer
    VICTAS
    Product code
    020242
    Hardness
    40±3

    Reviews by user

    • Three Family @ Shake Fore Table

      (Experience:11〜20 years) It looks like a knuckle out VO & gt; 101 It feels like a person looking back

      Reviews by user

      Expectation was a good point of VO> 101 and 102, but it was noticed for the first time I opened the package and noticed it.
      The grain shape is slightly smaller than VO> 102 and the cross section is close to a cylinder. That means ... is not a rotating system?
      Naturally the opponent who "falls" naturally "falls" (VO> 102 ratio)
      If you drive a low down rotation, the rotation does not take more than VO> 102, it is slightly linearly over without drawing the archwire.
      Slightly floating down rotation enters at the same speed as VO> 102 if you hit the ball as it is, speed was reasonable.
      When I try back blocking, knuckle comes out normally. Control in the back is relatively easy.
      Speed ​​comes out from the red / blue spectrum and knuckle also comes out, so it is recommended for the type which pushes in while using knuckles in the back.
      I think that it is unsuitable for the people of the Shake Fore table or the day pen forest table which makes opportunities with the fore drive and is hitting it.
      I returned VO> 102 on the same day.

      See original review

      2018/08/04
      All
      7/10
      Speed
      9
      Spin
      6
      Control
      7
      Hardness Little soft

      Racket recommended use ALBA

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      (Experience:2〜3 years) Is 102 to 103 tight?

      Reviews by user

      I use table software with a Japanese pen.
      I used VO101 until a while ago, but I wanted VO103 because I wanted rotation when serving.
      As an impression, it was very easy to use. Even though it was vertical, it was rotating in the serve, and the blocks and meat hits became knuckles. The stop also stops short on the table, and Tsuttsuki pierces deeply when cut firmly. At the same time, however, I was impressed by the people who use VO102. VO102 takes more rotation, and if you hit the meat with the correct form, it will become a knuckle. I think that the person who is going to change from VO102 to VO103 has an image that the rotation has been greatly reduced and the knuckle has become easier.
      I don't recommend it to people who are currently using VO102, but I think it's a very good rubber for the pen table and those who are thinking of making a different rubber from VO101.

      See original review

      2019/10/06
      All
      10/10
      Speed
      8
      Spin
      6
      Control
      7
      Hardness Little hard

      Racket recommended use Birmingham 77

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      (Experience:2〜3 years) Best balance rubber

      Reviews by user

      The table software is really difficult, and unlike the back software, I think that it is not so good if it is a rubber that you should increase the numbers of bounce, speed and rotation.

      Among them, I thought that this rubber is high in absolute value of rubber and the speed, knuckle, control, number of rotation and balance are the best.
      And the best part of this rubber is that the sponge is solid, so the attack and defense are stable without blurring on the platform.

      Especially recommended for men's shakeback. I will go for this for the time being.

      See original review

      2019/07/05
      All
      10/10
      Speed
      9
      Spin
      9
      Control
      9
      Hardness Little soft

      Racket recommended use QUARTET AFC

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • Triangular Edge God Beast Mirror

      (Experience:2〜3 years) I agree with the quartet!

      Reviews by user

      I used 1.8 for the back. I changed from Morist. At first it was combined with the inner force, but it feels like it does not fly from Morist. Therefore it was very easy for knuckles to come out and I felt it was easy to do blocks. However, I felt that the attack did not reach Morist. However, when combined with the VICTAS Quartet SFC, the offensive and defensive balance is well balanced and the driving is easy and satisfying.

      See original review

      2019/06/29
      All
      7/10
      Speed
      7
      Spin
      7
      Control
      8
      Hardness Little soft

      Racket recommended use QUARTET SFC

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      (Experience:11〜20 years) It may be unexpected ...

      Reviews by user

      It is a transition from 102. 101 quit in one practice session. Block 103 is very easy to do. Knuckle comes out naturally. I have no image that slides so much. When asked if it was 101 or 102, I felt that the quality was 101, but I said that Victus was 102. Certainly I can play it, it takes it if I cut it, and I can feel it closer to 102. At the moment I hit it, I felt that I was nervous, and I thought "I'm sorry ...", but I will use it for a while, because I have one more ball than usual. Certainly, between 101 and 102, it is a good cop, if it is bad, it is a rubber without such a characteristic ...

      See original review

      2019/06/24
      All
      8/10
      Speed
      8
      Spin
      7
      Control
      10
      Hardness Little soft

      Racket recommended use FIRE FALL VC

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • Bob @ S

      (Experience:11〜20 years) From 101.

      Reviews by user

      Since I am doing tension type table software of long eyes, I purchased it by seeing the evaluation of the net since it was released. I felt that the impression of incorporating 1.8 for about a month was intermediate between 101 and 102 in the concept of the manufacturer, but it is close to 101 due to the eyes. It is slightly harder than 101, but when you bite in blowing you can exit the opponent with no touch. At the time of a block or a rally, it will be naturally knuckle and the ball which the person dislikes will go. 2.0 makes it a bit heavier. If you can do how to spin with table software you can also rotate. It is not suitable for table beginners or beginners, but it is suitable for those who want to attack with knuckles. As an aside, I use players from the Japan league.

      See original review

      2019/03/01
      All
      8/10
      Speed
      10
      Spin
      6
      Control
      7
      Hardness Little hard

      Racket recommended use Forutiusu FT

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • Drosui

      (Experience:4〜5 years) difficult. .

      Reviews by user

      I changed from an inertial xs to this rubber, but I thought that it was changed too much. There are also different types at all, but it can not spin as well as spinning, but it certainly will be a great knuckle when entering.
      I thought that receiving was also difficult and I felt it would not fit me and changed it less than a week ago.
      It is a bit difficult.

      See original review

      2019/02/23
      All
      5/10
      Speed
      6
      Spin
      4
      Control
      4
      Hardness Little soft

      Racket recommended use Innerforce Layer ALC

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    1. 1
    2. 2
    3. Next >
    Post a review

    Top Players

    Country

    Style

    Welcome to the table tennis Navi!

    Sign up!