NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  ALNADE

  

  I switched from the Timo Boll ALC. To give the conclusion right away, it comes down to one phrase: "an all-around blade." The feel is just a touch harder than the Timo Boll ALC, and it has a good balance of spin and speed that doesn't limit where on the court you play. I put a harder rubber on my forehand, and it still held the ball well and let me hit high-quality topspin drives with a nice arc. The grip is thin too and easy to hold.
  And on top of everything, the value for money is the best. I bought it online for around 8,800 yen, but the performance rivals that legendary blade, the Timo Boll ALC. With the money you'd spend on one Timo Boll ALC, you could buy two of these — enough for a spare.
  I'd recommend this to intermediate-to-advanced players who like outer blades and want stability, and to players who play broadly from close to the table to mid- and far-distance.

  See original review Hide original review

  ティモボルalcから変更しました。まず結論から申し上げると、「万能ラケット」という一言に尽きます。打球感はティモボルalcよりほんの少し硬い感じで、スピンとスピードのバランスが良くプレー領域を選びません。フォアは硬めを貼りましたがしっかりと球を持ち、弧線を描く質の高いドライブが打てました。グリップも細めで握りやすかったです。
  そして何よりコスパが最高です。ネットで8800円くらいで購入しましたが、性能はあの名作ラケットティモボルalcに匹敵します。ティモボルalcを買うお金があれば2本買えます。スペアラケット買えます。
  中〜上級者のアウターラケット好きで安定感を求めたい人、前〜中後陣で広くプレーをする人にオススメです。

  2019/04/04

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	8
  Control	8
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber(Front) Evolution MX-P

  Recommend rubber(Back) RIGAN

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  13

• 

  Tenergy 05 FX

  

  I used it on both sides. The feel is close to Tenergy 64, without the hardness of Tenergy 05. Because of that, I feel it performs better with strokes where the ball sinks into the sponge rather than ones that just graze the surface. Also, in topspin rallies you don't get that losing-out feeling that's typical of soft rubbers — you can return the ball with solid spin. That said, being a soft rubber, it's hard to smash through, so I think it suits a style that grinds out points in rallies rather than going for outright winners. Also, when hitting from away from the table you get spin, but the ball tends to land a bit shallow, making you vulnerable to counters. So I think it's perfect for players who attack with topspin drives and look for counters close to or at mid-distance from the table.

  See original review Hide original review

  両面で使用しました。打球感はテナジー64に近く、テナジー05の硬さはありませんでした。そのため、摩る打ち方よりは食い込ませる打ち方の方が性能を発揮しやすいように思います。また、打ち合いでは柔らかいラバー特有の打ち負ける感じがなく、しっかりと回転のかかったボールを返すことが出来ます。しかし、やはり柔らかいラバーなので打ち抜くボールは難しく、どっちかというとラリーで粘って得点を取るタイプに向いていると思います。また、後陣から打つと回転はかかりますが若干浅く入ってしまうのでカウンターを狙われやすいです。なので、前中陣でドライブ攻撃とカウンターを狙う方にぴったりだと思います。

  2019/02/08

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Mizutani Jun

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  8

• 

  Kenta Matsudaira ALC

  

  It weighed 82.5g when I bought it.
  As you'd expect from the catalog specs, the feel off the ball is almost the same as the Timo Boll ALC and the Viscaria, but the grip shape is completely different.

  The Viscaria's thick grip lets you hold on firmly for hard shots, while the Matsudaira Kenta ALC's thin grip makes it easy to use your wrist, giving the impression that short-game and backhand shots are easier to swing. The Timo Boll feels like it's somewhere in between.

  Also, because the grip is thin, even small hands can hold it firmly, which stabilizes topspin drives. However, when I got tense I felt like I was gripping too hard, so it might be worth consciously relaxing your grip.

  Since the weight is concentrated toward the tip of the blade, it's easy to generate power on a single big shot, but it makes the racket feel heavier than it actually is, so I'd recommend going lighter with your rubber choice — for example, using a softer rubber on the backhand!

  See original review Hide original review

  重量は購入時は82.5gでした。
  打球感はカタログを見ても分かる通りティモボルalcやビスカリアとほぼ同じでしたが、グリップの形が全然違いました。

  ビスカリアはグリップが太いので強打時にガッチリと握れ、松平健太alcはグリップが細いので手首を利かせやすく、台上やバックハンドが振りやすい印象でした。ティモボルはその間って感じです。

  またグリップが細いため手が小さくてもがっちり握れるため、ドライブが安定します。しかし緊張したときは力が入りすぎる感じがしたため、意識して力を抜いた方がいいかもしれません。

  ラケットの先端に重心があるため、一発の威力は出しやすいですが実際よりもラケットが重く感じるため、ラバーはバックを柔らかくするなど軽くすることをおすすめします！

  2020/03/28

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Touch	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber(Front) DIGNICS 80

  Recommend rubber(Back) Vega Asia DF

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  6

• 

  Evolution MX-P

  

  I used it on the forehand. Online people often say it's similar to Tenergy, but from my experience using it, it's quite a bit harder than Tenergy. Even so, there's a firm sense of holding the ball, and I could hit consistently high-quality shots. That said, it doesn't hold the ball too much, unlike with old-style celluloid balls — the ball leaves the rubber at a reasonable speed, which made it easy to handle. Also, because the topsheet and sponge are hard and have good body to them, I could hit satisfying shots everywhere from close to the table to away from it.
  That said, it might be a bit easy to get affected by incoming spin, so I felt a little trouble with the short game, but that's something you get used to with practice. It's also on the heavier side.
  I'd recommend this rubber to intermediate-and-up players with a strong impact and a wide range of play.

  See original review Hide original review

  フォア面で使用しました。ネットではテナジー に似てるとよく言われますが、私が使った感じではテナジー よりも結構硬いです。しかし、しっかりとボールを持つ感覚があり、安定した質の高いボールが打てました。それでもセルボールのときのような球を持ちすぎる感じは無く、適度な球離れの速さで扱いやすかったです。また、硬くてコシのあるトップシートとスポンジなので前陣〜後陣のすべての領域で満足のいくボールが打てました。
  ただ、回転の影響を受けやすいのか少し台上にやりにくさをを感じましたが、そこは練習をしていれば慣れます。また、重量も重めです。
  このラバーはインパクトの強い中級者以上でプレー領域の広い方にオススメです。

  2019/04/04

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	10
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket ALNADE

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  Timo Boll ALC

  

  For a while, I used the same rubber combination on the discontinued classic blade, the "Jun Mizutani," but after the switch to plastic balls I felt like I was making more unforced errors, so I tried this blade, which has a bit less bounce. As an ALC blade, it holds the ball a bit longer than a ZLC, and drives with a high arcing trajectory started going in consistently. Also, being an outer blade, it has plenty of bounce, so you can hit high-quality drives even from mid-distance or a bit further back. That said, from away from the table it does feel like it loses a bit of steam compared to the Jun Mizutani, so I think you need to make up for that with rubber choice and physical strength. As for the feel, it's a bit more muffled than the Jun Mizutani, which felt a little off at first, but I got used to it quickly. Either way, this blade's track record speaks for its quality, so I'd really like intermediate to advanced players to give it a try.

  See original review Hide original review

  しばらくの間は、廃盤になっている名作ラケットの「水谷隼」に同じラバーの組み合わせを使っていましたが、プラボールになって以降凡ミスが増えたと感じたため少し弾みが抑えられたこのラケットを使用してみました。すると、ALCのラケットということでZLCよりは少し球を持つ感じになり、高い弧線を描くドライブが安定して入るようになりました。また、アウターラケットということで弾みも充分にあるので中陣〜やや下がった位置からでも質の高いドライブが打てます。ただ、後陣からだと水谷隼と比べて少し失速する感じがあるのでそこはラバーと筋力で補うのが良いと思います。打球感に関しては水谷隼よりも少しこもった感じなのでそこは少し違和感がありましたがすぐ慣れました。いずれにせよ、性能の良さはこのラケットの実績が物語っているので中〜上級者の方は是非使用してみてほしいラケットです。

  2019/03/24

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Touch	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber(Front) ROZENA

  Recommend rubber(Back) Ventus Speed

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

1. 1
2. 2
3. Next >