NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  ALNADE

  

  Changed from Timo Boll alc. First of all, from the conclusion, it is just a word "a universal racket". The feel at impact is a little harder than Timovor alc, so the balance between spin and speed is good and it doesn't choose the play area. Fore put a firm but firmly held ball and hit a high quality drive that draws an arc. The grip was thin and easy to hold.
  And above all cospa is the best. We purchased for around 8800 yen on the net, but the performance is comparable to that masterpiece racquet Timovor alc. If you have the money to buy Timo Boll alc you can buy two. You can buy a spare racket.
  It is recommended for people who like middle to advanced outer rackets and want a sense of stability, people who play widely in front to middle back.

  See original review Hide original review

  ティモボルalcから変更しました。まず結論から申し上げると、「万能ラケット」という一言に尽きます。打球感はティモボルalcよりほんの少し硬い感じで、スピンとスピードのバランスが良くプレー領域を選びません。フォアは硬めを貼りましたがしっかりと球を持ち、弧線を描く質の高いドライブが打てました。グリップも細めで握りやすかったです。
  そして何よりコスパが最高です。ネットで8800円くらいで購入しましたが、性能はあの名作ラケットティモボルalcに匹敵します。ティモボルalcを買うお金があれば2本買えます。スペアラケット買えます。
  中〜上級者のアウターラケット好きで安定感を求めたい人、前〜中後陣で広くプレーをする人にオススメです。

  2019/04/04

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	8
  Control	8
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber（Front） Evolution MX-P

  Recommend rubber（Back） RIGAN

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  13

• 

  Tenergy 05 FX

  

  I used it on both sides. The shot feeling was close to Tenazi 64, there was no hardness of tenazie 05. Therefore, I think that it is easier for the way of bite to let it penetrate than the way to hit it. Also, at the meeting, there is no feeling of defeating peculiar to the soft rubber, and it is possible to return the ball which was firmly rotated. However, as it is still a soft rubber, it is difficult for the ball to punch out, I think that it is suitable for a type that sticks with a rally and sticks which way to score. Moreover, although it takes a turn when struck from the back, it is easy to be aimed at counters because it enters somewhat shallowly. So, I think that it is perfect for those who aim at driving attacks and counters in the former middle team.

  See original review Hide original review

  両面で使用しました。打球感はテナジー64に近く、テナジー05の硬さはありませんでした。そのため、摩る打ち方よりは食い込ませる打ち方の方が性能を発揮しやすいように思います。また、打ち合いでは柔らかいラバー特有の打ち負ける感じがなく、しっかりと回転のかかったボールを返すことが出来ます。しかし、やはり柔らかいラバーなので打ち抜くボールは難しく、どっちかというとラリーで粘って得点を取るタイプに向いていると思います。また、後陣から打つと回転はかかりますが若干浅く入ってしまうのでカウンターを狙われやすいです。なので、前中陣でドライブ攻撃とカウンターを狙う方にぴったりだと思います。

  2019/02/08

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Mizutani Jun

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  7

• 

  Kenta Matsudaira ALC

  

  Weight was 82.5g at the time of purchase.
  The shot feeling was almost the same as Timobol alc and Biscalia as you can see from the catalog, but the shape of the grip was completely different.

  The Vicaria has a thick grip so it can be grasped firmly when hitting hard. The Kenta Matsudaira alc has a thin grip that makes it easy to use the wrist, and the tabletop and backhand were easy to swing. Timobor feels like that.

  In addition, because the grip is thin, even if your hand is small, you can hold firmly, so the drive is stable. However, when I was nervous, I felt too much power, so it might be better to be conscious and relax.

  Because the center of the racket has a center of gravity, the power of one shot is easy to put out, but since the racket feels heavier than it really is, we recommend that you make the rubber softer such as softening the back!

  See original review Hide original review

  重量は購入時は82.5gでした。
  打球感はカタログを見ても分かる通りティモボルalcやビスカリアとほぼ同じでしたが、グリップの形が全然違いました。

  ビスカリアはグリップが太いので強打時にガッチリと握れ、松平健太alcはグリップが細いので手首を利かせやすく、台上やバックハンドが振りやすい印象でした。ティモボルはその間って感じです。

  またグリップが細いため手が小さくてもがっちり握れるため、ドライブが安定します。しかし緊張したときは力が入りすぎる感じがしたため、意識して力を抜いた方がいいかもしれません。

  ラケットの先端に重心があるため、一発の威力は出しやすいですが実際よりもラケットが重く感じるため、ラバーはバックを柔らかくするなど軽くすることをおすすめします！

  2020/03/28

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Touch	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber（Front） DIGNICS 80

  Recommend rubber（Back） Vega Asia DF

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  6

• 

  Timo Boll ALC

  

  For a while, I used the same rubber combination for “Mizutani Satoshi”, a masterpiece racket that has been discontinued, but I felt this was a plastic ball and I felt that there was an increase in mistakes since I became a plastic ball. I used it. Then, with the ALC racket, it feels like it has a little more ball than ZLC, and the drive that draws a high arc comes to enter stably. In addition, because the outer racket has enough elasticity, I hit a high-quality drive even from the middle position down slightly. However, I think that it is better to supplement with rubber and muscle power because it feels to be stalled a little compared to Mizutani Pass if it is from the rear team. As for the feel at impact, I felt a bit more involved than Mizutani Minoru, so I felt a bit uncomfortable, but I got used to it immediately. Anyway, good performance is the racket's experience with this racket, so mid- to advanced users should try using it by all means.

  See original review Hide original review

  しばらくの間は、廃盤になっている名作ラケットの「水谷隼」に同じラバーの組み合わせを使っていましたが、プラボールになって以降凡ミスが増えたと感じたため少し弾みが抑えられたこのラケットを使用してみました。すると、ALCのラケットということでZLCよりは少し球を持つ感じになり、高い弧線を描くドライブが安定して入るようになりました。また、アウターラケットということで弾みも充分にあるので中陣〜やや下がった位置からでも質の高いドライブが打てます。ただ、後陣からだと水谷隼と比べて少し失速する感じがあるのでそこはラバーと筋力で補うのが良いと思います。打球感に関しては水谷隼よりも少しこもった感じなのでそこは少し違和感がありましたがすぐ慣れました。いずれにせよ、性能の良さはこのラケットの実績が物語っているので中〜上級者の方は是非使用してみてほしいラケットです。

  2019/03/24

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Touch	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber（Front） ROZENA

  Recommend rubber（Back） Ventus Speed

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  Tenergy 64

  

  Although it is a little expensive, I thought that I wanted speed and used it. As a result of using it, the shot feeling was so soft that I could hardly think that I used the same sponge as Tenazi 05, and it was easy to control. I felt a little close to tenaji 05 fx as a feeling of being struck. In addition, the speed was satisfactory, the ball which was firmly rotated even from the backwards entered deep into the opponent's table, and hit a ball that was difficult to target the counter. However, it is recommended that you use 64fx for first-intermediate users, as there will be no rotation or speed unless you make a firm impact on how to let it dig into.

  See original review Hide original review

  少し値段は高いですが、スピードが欲しいと思い両面で使用しました。使ってみた結果、テナジー05と同じスポンジを使っているとは思えないほど打球感が柔らかく、コントロールがしやすかったです。打ってる感じとしてはテナジー05fxに少し近い感じがしました。またスピードは申し分なく、後陣からでもしっかり回転のかかったボールが相手の台の深くに入り、カウンターを狙われにくいボールを打てました。ただ、食い込ませる打ち方でしっかりインパクトをしないと回転もスピードも出ないので、初〜中級の方は64fxを使うことをおすすめします。

  2019/02/08

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	8
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Mizutani Jun

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

1. 1
2. 2
3. Next >