NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  TENERGY 19

  

  I wanted to compare Tenergy 05 and Tenergy 19, so I put one on each side and tried them out.

  Since a lot of people say 19 suits the backhand, I used it there first.
  Since it's a Tenergy, of course it was good, and I was satisfied enough with it. But it was more like "oh, so this is what 19 is like," nothing more.
  However, when I tried it on the forehand, I got a grip-on-the-ball feeling that 05 didn't give me, and once I felt that, my improvement sped up and I was able to play with confidence in matches without getting nervous. My shots against backspin especially got more stable.

  Overall, my impression is that 05 has the edge in initial speed and how quickly the ball comes off the rubber after contact. I feel 19 wins on stability, 05 has the higher ceiling for destructive power, and 19 is easier to bring its performance out of.
  That said, this probably invites comparison with 80 too — but 19 seems to arc the ball more than 80, and I also feel counters are easier with 19 than with 80.

  See original review Hide original review

  テナジー05とテナジー19を打ち比べたいということで片面ずつ張って試打

  多くの人がバック向けって言ってたことから、最初はバックで使用。
  テナジーなので、当然良いに決まっており、満足っちゃあ満足。１９ってこんなもんかー程度でした。
  しかしながら、試しにフォアで使用したら、05ではなかったボール掴む感覚が得られ、この感覚を得てから上達スピードが上がり、試合でもビビらずに自信を持ったプレーができるようになりました。特に対下回転打ちが安定しました。

  トータルして言うと
  初速、当たってからの飛び出しの良さは05のほうがあるかなって印象。安定性は19、破壊力の最大値は05、性能の引き出しやすさは19と感じてます
  となると80との比較にもなってくると思いますが、80より弧線を描いてくれる印象もあり、カウンターのやりやすさも19のほうが上と感じてます。

  2023/01/04

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  45

• 

  Innerforce Layer ALC

  

  I'd been through outer ALC blades, special material blades, 5-ply all-wood, cheating on my blade with all sorts of options
  Amid all that, this one just felt too much of a classic standard, so I never really felt like using it.

  I tried it out
  and now I regret not switching to inner ALC sooner.
  Since switching to this one, practice has become so much fun I can't stand it. Thanks to that, I've been practicing more too

  It pairs way too well with Tenergy, and when you swing through it fully it makes that metallic ALC-blade sound.
  When you hit it softly, it feels almost like wood.
  I feel like it's easier to copy the play of skilled players with it. Because of that, I can actually feel myself improving too.

  Now I get why everyone recommends it.
  A gear you can trust.

  See original review Hide original review

  アウターALCやら特殊素材、5枚合板やら使って、たくさんのラケットに浮気三昧でした
  そんな中でこいつは、定番すぎて使いたいって思いませんでした。

  試しに使ってみて
  なぜもっと早くにインナーALCにしなかったのかと後悔してます。
  コイツにしてから、練習が楽しくて楽しくてたまらんです。そのおかげで練習量も増えてます

  テナジーとの相性良すぎるし、しっかりスイングした時はALC系のラケットの金属音がなります。
  柔らかく当てた時は、ほぼ木材の感覚。
  上手い人たちのプレーを模倣しやすいって感じてます。そのため上達も実感できる。

  みんなからおすすめされてる理由が分かった。
  信頼できるギア。

  2023/01/04

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	10
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber(Front) TENERGY 19

  Recommend rubber(Back) TENERGY 19

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  41

• 

  ALLROUND EVOLUTION

  

  I played table tennis from junior high through high school
  I guess you could call me an intermediate player - I made it to the prefectural tournament in singles

  I practice 3-4 times a week, and I tried using the mainstream equipment of modern table tennis, but I didn't improve much (I couldn't develop good feel)
  I started wondering if my skill level just didn't match up with special-material blades
  so with that doubt in mind, and wanting to go back to basics, I decided to switch to a 5-ply blade

  I liked the inner ZLF I was using before, but
  compared to wood, I felt it didn't resonate much in my hand
  Compared to that, this All Round Evolution really resonates in your hand.
  I think the feel you get when you hit the ball (how it resonates in your hand) is key to developing good touch
  Chasing that feel when you play leads to both more power and more consistency.

  Also, the way it resonates in your hand naturally builds up a sense in your mind of "this ball is coming back!"
  which I think leads to faster recovery for the next shot

  The Rozena rubber's packaging has that "tolerance" catchphrase (whatever that really means), but
  I feel like this All Round Evolution is the blade that truly embodies that same kind of "tolerance."

  See original review Hide original review

  私は中学～高校まで現役で卓球をしていた人間です
  一応シングルスで県大会まで行っていた自称中級者です

  週３～４で練習しており、現代卓球の道具の主流の道具を使ってみるも大して上達せず（感覚が身につかない）
  自分の技術レベルと特殊素材が合ってないのでは？
  ということも疑念もあり、初心に帰るという意味も込めて思い切って５枚合板に変更しました

  それまで使用していたインナーZLFも気に入っていたのですが
  手に響く感覚というのが木材に比べあまりないと感じていました
  それに比べ
  このオールラウンドエボリューションは手に響きます。
  感覚を身につけるうえで重要なのは打った感覚（手への響き方）と私は捉えています
  感覚を求めて打っていくと攻撃力にも安定感につながります。

  また手への響き方でこのボールは返球される！という指標が自分の中で勝手に出来上がってきて
  次への戻りの速さにつながるものと思います

  ラバーのロゼナのパッケージにおいてトレランス（許容度？）という謳い文句あるかとおもいますが
  ラケットのトレランスみたいなのを体現したラケットはこのオールラウンドエボリューションだと感じてます

  2020/02/04

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	5
  Spin	9
  Control	10
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Soft

  Recommend rubber(Front) ROZENA

  Recommend rubber(Back) ROZENA

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  21

• 

  GLAYZER

  

  This is a comparison against Tenergy 19.

  Amount of spin
  Tenergy >> Glayzer

  Speed
  Tenergy = Glayzer

  Maximum ball power
  Tenergy >>>> Glayzer

  How satisfying it feels to hit the ball
  Tenergy >>>> an insurmountable wall >>>> Glayzer

  Consistency
  Tenergy << Glayzer

  How easy it is to bring out the rubber's performance
  Tenergy <<<< Glayzer

  Tolerance
  Tenergy <<<< Glayzer

  Overall,
  I think Tenergy is the better rubber.

  When I hit the ball myself, I don't get that feeling of a really good ball going out the way I do with Tenergy.
  The person receiving my shots also says Tenergy's balls come in heavier,
  but when I swing with less effort, it seems like Glayzer's ball goes further.

  Considering my age, and the fact that my physical strength will start to decline from here on,
  I'm honestly at the point where I can't decide whether to keep using Glayzer or switch to Tenergy going forward.
  And when you consider it's around 5,000 yen after discount, I think that's amazing value.

  See original review Hide original review

  テナジー19との比較になります。

  回転量
  テナジー＞＞グレイザー

  スピード
  テナジー＝グレイザー

  ボールの威力の最大値
  テナジー＞＞＞＞グレイザー

  ボールを打ってるときの気持ちよさ
  テナジー＞＞＞＞超えられない壁＞＞＞＞グレイザー

  安定感
  テナジー＜＜グレイザー

  ラバー性能の引き出しやすさ
  テナジー＜＜＜＜グレイザー

  トレランス
  テナジー＜＜＜＜グレイザー

  総合的に言うと
  テナジーのほうが優れてると思います

  自分で打った感じいいボールが行ってる感はテナジーには及びません。
  受け取り手もテナジーのほうが来てると言ってますが
  軽い力で振ったときはグレイザーのほうが行ってる模様。

  年齢を考えると、今後体力的な衰えも出始めることから
  グレイザーとテナジー、今後どっちを使っていくか迷わせるレベルにあります
  これで割引されて５０００円前後ってすごいと思う。

  2023/04/06

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	8
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  14

• 

  DIGNICS 64

  

  I was curious so I tried it out

  Impressions
  It's fast. Compared to Tenergy 64 and Rozena

  but the amount of spin on topspin drives doesn't feel like much

  For serves, pushes, etc., the sheet is soft so it seems to grip the ball, and
  my opponents kept dropping the ball into the net

  I feel the brushing-type techniques are better than with Tenergy or Rozena
  but because the sponge hardness is high, I couldn't get the ball to sink in and use it well

  I feel intermediate players wouldn't use this

  See original review Hide original review

  興味があったので使ってみました

  感想
  スピードはでる。テナジー６４やロゼナに比べると

  しかしドライブの回転のかかり具合はそんな大したことない感じ

  サーブ、ツッツキ等はシートが柔らかいので回転かかるのか
  相手は落としてくれました

  擦るような技術はテナジーやロゼナより上と感じてます
  しかし食い込ませるのはスポンジ硬度が高いため、私は使いこなせませんでした

  中級者は使わないと感じます

  2020/03/15

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	7
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket ALLROUND EVOLUTION

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  12

1. 1
2. 2
3. Next >