NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  RAKZA Z

  

  Segna Nihon Pen Square It is used on the fore side that supports both sides. When I try to play billiards, which is the basic principle, I get the impression that it is sticky. If you rub it with a sheet, it will be sticky. So serve, Tsuttsuki, stop, and rubbing drive will give you a good quality ball. On the other hand, if it is a smash or a drive that lets you bite into it, it will give you a feeling of tension combined with the performance of the racket. However, the speed is not as good as the tension, so I can't beat it without power. It is safer to think that the middle team and the apse should not think about punching out, but just make the best use of the arch line and rotation to compete. Probably, it will not fly further with a racket that does not bounce, so it may be tough even in the middle team. As a personal disadvantage, it is sticky, so it is easily affected by the rotation of the other party. In particular, I personally find it difficult to counter for loop drives. (Although it is a matter of my own skill ...) It seems that it is not possible to get a good stickiness and tension. Personally, I think it has a strong adhesive element.

  See original review Hide original review

  セグナ日ペン角形両面対応のフォア面で使用してます。基本のきである玉突きをしてみると｢あー粘着だなぁ｣という印象。シートで擦る打ち方だと、粘着らしさが出ます。なのでサーブ・ツッツキ・ストップ・擦るドライブは、質の良い球が出ます。逆にスマッシュだったり、食い込ませるドライブなどだと、ラケットの性能と相まってテンションらしさが出ます。が、やはりスピードではテンションに敵わないのでパワーが無いと打ち抜けないです。中陣・後陣では打ち抜く事を考えず、ひたすら弧線と回転を活かして勝負をすると割り切って考えた方が無難です。たぶん、弾まないラケットでは更に飛ばないので、中陣でも厳しくなるかもです…。個人的なデメリットとして、粘着らしさがあるので相手の回転の影響を受けやすいです。特に、個人的にはループドライブに対するカウンターはやりにくく感じます。(私自身の技量の問題でもありますが…)粘着とテンションの良いとこ取り…とはいかない様です。個人的には、粘着の要素が強いのかなと思います。

  2020/12/16

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket SEGNA

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  11

• 

  SEGNA

  

  I am using a Japanese style pen square double-sided compatible Segna.
  This is a comparison with Yasaka's Double Face II JP made of 5 plywood wood. Segna is true to the claim that it has a shot feeling of wood. Compared to the double face, the shot feeling is similar, but the momentum is good, and it is good not to stall even if you hit from the middle to the apse. As a disadvantage. The ball is released quickly, and the size of the board is slightly elongated, so the center of gravity is closer to the tip, so it feels heavy. However, it is within the permissible range personally. The momentum is a little unsatisfactory compared to when I used a single plate in the past, but it is similar to the feeling of grasping the ball. I myself changed from a single-sided single-plate Japanese pen to a Chinese style, but it didn't quite fit, and I came across Segna looking for a double-sided Japanese pen. I'm pretty happy.

  See original review Hide original review

  日本式ペン角形両面対応のセグナを使用してます。
  木材５枚合板のヤサカのダブルフェイスⅡJPとの比較になります。セグナは木材の打球感があるという謳い文句に偽りなしという感じです。ダブルフェイスに比べると打球感は似ていますが、弾みが良く、中陣～後陣から打っても失速しないのが良いです。デメリットとしては。球離れが気持ち早く、板の大きさが少し細長いので重心が先端に寄るので重く感じます。が、個人的には許容範囲内です。昔、単板を使っていた時に比べるとやや弾みが物足りないですが、球を掴む感覚が良いのが似ています。私自身は片面単板日ペンから中国式にしましたが、いまいちしっくりこず、両面対応の日ペンを探してセグナに出会いました。かなり満足しています。

  2020/12/16

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	8
  Control	7
  Touch	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber（Front） RAKZA Z

  Recommend rubber（Back） Rakza 7 Soft

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  Rakza 7

  

  Among the various trials in the Rakuza series, was it the one that suits you best?
  Right now, I'm using a medium thickness
  It is good that the archwire does not come out too much and is not straight.
  It takes enough rotation to hit low loops easily.
  I can also serve
  Control performance is also good
  Speaking strongly, I think that it is difficult to get speed,
  If you have a play style that emphasizes rotation rather than speed,
  It is one that I want you to try once

  See original review Hide original review

  ラクザシリーズで色々試した中で、自分に一番合ったのかラクザ７
  今は、中厚で使用してます
  弧線が出過ぎず、かといって直線的にならないのが良い
  回転も十分にかかって、低いループが打ちやすい
  サーブも切れます
  コントロール性能も良いです
  強いて言えば、スピードが出にくいとおもいますが
  スピードよりも回転重視のプレースタイルの人は
  一度試して欲しい１枚です

  2020/08/18

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	10
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket SWEDEN EXTRA

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  SWEDEN EXTRA

  

  Performance that feels that all of the speed spin controls are good.
  However, the impression that it bounces more than I expected.
  I like the arc line of Rakza 7, so I've been using it all the time,
  At first, the desired arc line did not appear, and the ball became a straight hit.
  I think it is more suitable for those who play firmly and hit rather than arc lines.

  See original review Hide original review

  スピード・スピン・コントロールのどれも良いと感じる性能。
  ただ、思ったより弾むという印象。
  ラクザ７の弧線が好きなので、ずっと使っているのですが、
  初めは思ったような弧線が出ず、直線的な打球になりました。
  弧線よりも、しっかりと弾いて打つプレーをする人には合いそうだと思います。

  2020/08/18

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	8
  Control	7
  Touch	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber（Front） Rakza 7

  Recommend rubber（Back） ELFRARK

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  Swat

  

  The racket I bought for the first time when I changed from Japanese pen to medium pen
  I used plywood itself for the first time, but I realized that it has good operability that veneer does not have.
  It's easy to spin because it doesn't have too much momentum and it holds a ball well.
  It's easy to fit in the hand and I think it's perfect for beginners

  See original review Hide original review

  日ペンから中ペンに変更した時、初めて購入したラケット
  合板自体初めて使用しましたが、単板にはない、操作性の良さを実感
  弾み過ぎず、球持ちも良い為、回転も掛け易いです
  手に馴染みやすく、初心者が使用するにはピッタリだと思います

  2020/08/09

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	8
  Control	8
  Touch	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber（Front） RIGAN

  Recommend rubber（Back） Ventus Basic

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

1. 1
2. 2
3. Next >