NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  ESCUDER 2

  

  I've been waiting for a racket like this.

  It's 5.3mm to 5.5mm thick, with a special inner material and a koto surface (preferably even plywood).

  It picks up a lot of cuts.

  I'd be happy if there was a step-up racket with the same thickness but with a special material mixed with carbon.

  This is a comparison of the Matsushita Koji ZC with the Escuda 2, with all 7s as the standard when cutting.

  As for the cut standard, it still doesn't have a 5.4mm flight distance.

  The ball feels a little slower to leave the racket.

  When cutting, the Ilius S is sharper than the Matsushita ZC.

  When pushing, the grain height doesn't feel light, and it feels like you can hold it, so it's very easy to use.

  Also, unlike the Panasonic ZC's snappy feel, it has a feel like an arylate, which is very pleasant.

  The Panasonic ZC is too easy to attack in various ways, but if you compare and evaluate it based only on attack, the Escuda 2 is about 5 to 6.
  It is recommended as a second racket for cut players, but it may be the racket you can use for the first time, and even if you buy a new racket, you will not be able to let it go. It is the kind of racket that you can use for the rest of your life.

  See original review Hide original review

  こういったラケットを待ってました
  厚さが5.3mmから5.5mmで、インナー特殊素材、表面コト材（出来れば均等合板）柳材の感触が苦手な方に最高です。また粘着ラバーと木材の相性がいいのか気持ちよすぎです。
  とてもいいので、このシリーズでケブラーのかわりにkvcの物が出たら絶対欲しいですね。
  下の評価欄は、松下浩二zcを、カット時の基準でオール8とした場合のエスクーダ2との比較です
  カットは素晴らしく収まります
  球離れはいくらか遅く感じます。
  イリウスsのキレについては、松下zcより切れ、ツッツキは、粒高の感触が軽くならず、持つ感じがありとても使いやすく思います
  また、松下zcのバチッといった感触とは違いアリレートのような持ち味があって大変気持ち良いです

  松下zc　攻撃時の基準をオール8としますとエスクーダ2が全体的に6~7くらいかと思われます
  ただコントロールはとてもいいので、素晴らしいです
  基本を学んだカットマンの二本目におすすめですが、大変よいので、一本目からずっと使え、また違うラケットを買っても手放せない、一生付き合える系のラケットです

  2024/06/10

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	8
  Control	9
  Touch	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber（Front） HURRICANE PRO Ⅲ TURBO BLUE

  Recommend rubber（Back） ILIUS S

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  5

• 

  SWATSPIN

  

  If we consider Tenergy 05 as an all-around 8:

  When returning topspin or when swung by a national-level power hitter, Tenergy had slightly better spin than Swat Spin. (As a rescue worker, I believe my physical abilities are reliable.)

  For normal balls, there isn't much difference, and it's very usable.

  It feels slightly harder than Rozena? But that allows it to handle powerful shots better.

  After about two months of use, it seems like its lifespan deteriorates quickly.

  It doesn't seem like it will develop the same worn-out feel as Tenergy.

  Considering cost-performance, this is overwhelmingly the better choice.

  See original review Hide original review

  テナジー05をオール8とした場合
  上回転のかけ返しや、全国レベルの豪腕の方が振った時に、スワットスピンよりテナジーの方がいくらか、回転のかかりがよかったです。(レスキュー隊員なので、フィジカルは間違いないと思われます)

  普通の球の分には、違いはあまりなく大変つかえます。
  ロゼナより気持ち硬い？かなぁと感じますがその分強打についてきてくれます。

  
  使い込みは2カ月で、そのまま寿命が悪くなるイメージです。

  テナジーの使い古しのような、感じにはなりにくそうです。

  コスパで考えたら圧倒的にこちらですね

  2026/03/29

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	7
  Control	8
  Hardness	Soft

  Recomend racket VISCARIA

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0