NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  GLAYZER09C

  

  Better than I expected.

  The sponge is hard but the topsheet is soft, so it holds the ball more than I thought.
  The short game is easy thanks to the tackiness, and when you hit hard the sponge gives it a lot of bounce.
  Even people who find Dignics 09C too hard to use should be able to handle this one.

  That said, it doesn't have the "auto" feel that Tenergy has.

  I bought it for my forehand, but it was easy to use on the backhand too.
  Considering the value for money, this might be the best option.

  See original review Hide original review

  予想以上に良かった

  スポンジは硬いがシートが柔らかいため思ったより球を持つ。
  台上は粘着の良さでやりやすく、強打するとスポンジのおかげでかなり弾む。
  ディグニクス09cは硬くて使いにくい人でもこのラバーなら使えると思う。

  ただしテナジーのようなオート感はない。

  フォア用に購入したが、バックでも使いやすかった。
  コスパを考えたら1番良いかもしれない。

  2023/12/06

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket Zhang Jike ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  12

• 

  GLAYZER

  

  A well-balanced rubber, for better or worse.
  Overall it's high-performance, but nothing about it really stands out.
  Like other people have said, it doesn't have much of that "auto" feel.
  Overall the feel on the ball is on the harder side, to the point that the 09C feels noticeably softer by comparison.

  I used this after getting back into table tennis after a few years away. It's not bad, but compared to Tenergy or Dignics it felt lacking.

  The overall hardness of the sheet and sponge is surprisingly close to Tenergy 05, so there's maybe a chance Tenergy 05 users could use this to save money in the off-season, or maybe not.

  Its sister rubber, the 09C, seems to have higher overall performance.

  See original review Hide original review

  良くも悪くもバランスが良いラバー。
  全体的に高性能だが、突出した点もない。
  他の人も言ってるが、オート感はそれほどない。
  トータルの打球感は割と硬めの印象で、09cの方が柔らかく感じるレベル

  数年ぶりに卓球を再開するに当たって使用した。悪くはないが、やはりテナジーやディグと比べると物足りなかった。

  シートとスポンジの全体の硬さは意外にもテナジー05と近いため、テナジー05使用者がオフシーズンにコストダウンするために使う可能性がワンチャンあったりなかったり？

  姉妹ラバーの09cの方が全体的な性能は高い印象

  2023/12/06

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	8
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket Zhang Jike ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  11

• 

  Innerforce Layer ZLC

  

  I used the older Innerforce ZLC.
  The ply construction from the outside is:
  Limba-Limba-ZLC-Ayous-ZLC-Limba-Limba

  It's technically an "inner" construction, but since the two limba plies are thin, the ZLC ends up positioned relatively close to the outside, so you really do get the flavor of the special material.
  Because of that, it feels soft on light shots, while the ZLC's stiffness comes through clearly on hard shots.
  True to the marketing, the sweet spot is wide.

  The ZLC is hard, but that hardness worked in my favor because it's an "easy-to-read" kind of hardness that lets you instantly tell where on the blade the ball hit.
  I think it would be a first choice for anyone who likes inner-ply blades.
  That said, I don't think it's all that different from the inner ALC.

  My one personal complaint is that the FL handle is thin, and at 180cm tall, I found it hard to grip.
  If there were a thicker FL handle option, I might still be using it today.

  See original review Hide original review

  旧インナーフォースZLCを使用
  合板構成は外から
  リンバ-リンバ-ZLC-アユース-ZLC-リンバ-リンバ

  確かに合板構成的には"インナー"だけど、2枚のリンバか薄いのでZLCは相対的に外側に配置されており、ちゃんと特殊素材の味が出る。
  そのため弱く打つと柔らかく、強打するとZLCの硬さが前面に出るラケット
  謳い文句の通りスイートスポットは広い

  ZLCは硬いが、この硬さはラケットのどこに球が当たったかを瞬時に判断させてくれる「わかりやすい硬さ」のため自分にはプラスに働いた。
  インナーが好きな人にはファーストチョイスになると思う。
  ただインナーALCとそこまで大きな違いはないと思われる

  個人的な不満点としてはFLのグリップが細く、180cmの自分には握りにくかった。
  太いFLグリップがあれば今でも使ってたかも。

  2023/12/06

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber(Front) TENERGY 05

  Recommend rubber(Back) Tenergy 64

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  6

• 

  Zhang Jike ALC

  

  This is a re-review.

  The ply construction, from the outside in, is:
  koto - ALC - limba - paulownia - limba - ALC - koto

  Since the ALC sits right underneath the hard koto wood, it's hard. The ball also leaves the blade quickly.
  People say it has a sense of gripping the ball, but that's only true among fast, bouncy blades — compared to an inner blade or all-wood blade, it doesn't grip the ball.
  Don't get that mixed up.

  Even setting those downsides aside, it flies like crazy. Because of that, if you pair it with a high-spin rubber (like Tenergy 05, Dignics 05, 09C, or Hurricane-type rubbers) and can put spin on the ball right at the moment of contact, it becomes an incredibly powerful blade.
  I could manage it for one-course shots, but in matches there were a lot of times I couldn't, so it was a blade that was too much for me to handle.

  Another advantage is that the FL grip is easy to hold, so I'd recommend it to anyone looking for a thicker grip. The grip is quietly quite important, but I think this Viscaria-style grip really suits the people it suits, so if you're curious, give it a try.

  Conclusion: one of the strongest blades for advanced players. Also recommended for anyone the grip suits. There are also people who buy it out of admiration for Zhang Jike.
  For anyone below advanced level, there's a good chance you won't be able to make full use of its performance.

  See original review Hide original review

  再レビューです。

  合板構成は外から
  コト-ALC-リンバ-桐-リンバ-ALC-コト

  硬いコトの直下にALCが来ているので硬いです。球離れも早いです。
  球を掴む感覚があると言われてますが、それはかっ飛びラケットの中での話、インナーや木材と比べると球を掴みません。
  そこは勘違いしてはいけません。

  それらのデメリットを差し置いてもめちゃくちゃ飛びます。そのため回転の強いラバー（テナジー05やディグ05、09c、キョウヒョウ系等）と組み合わせて、打つ瞬間に回転をかけることができる人には最強のラケットになります。
  自分はワンコースならできましたが、試合ではできない時が多く手に余るラケットでした。

  もう一つのメリットとしては、FLのグリップが握りやすく、太めのグリップをお探しの方にはおすすめです。グリップは地味にかなり重要なのですが、このビスカリア系グリップは合う人にはめちゃくちゃ合うと思うので、気になってる人は一度試してみてください。

  結論: 上級者には最強ラケットの一つ。グリップが合う人にもオススメ。張継科に憧れてる人もあり。
  上級者以外では性能を持て余す可能性が高いです。

  2023/12/04

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	8
  Control	7
  Touch	9
  Hardness	Hard

  Recommend rubber(Front) TENERGY 05

  Recommend rubber(Back) TENERGY 05

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  6

• 

  Tenergy 64

  

  A really easy-to-use, god-tier rubber

  The topsheet is soft so it's easy to get grip on the ball and control is easy too.
  Even with a light swing you get decent speed and spin.
  You don't need to force it, so I'd recommend using about 70% power, aiming for spots on the table, and scoring through rallies with repeated shots.

  Back when I was actively playing, 80 didn't exist yet, so this was the rubber I kept going back and forth on with 05.
  Against a sudden long serve from an opponent, it's easier than 05 to use the ball's own momentum to grip and return it.

  On the other hand, the spin amount, starting with loop drives, is inferior to 05.
  My image of it is: 05 for attacking, 64 for stability.

  See original review Hide original review

  かなり使いやすい神ラバー

  シートが柔らかいので食い込ませやすく、コントロールがしやすい。
  軽く打ってもそこそこのスピードと回転量がある。
  力まなくてもいいので、7割くらいの力でコースをついたり連打してラリーで得点するのがオススメ。

  現役の頃80がなかったので、05と迷って何度も行き来していたラバー。
  相手の咄嗟に来たロングサーブに対して、ボールの勢いを利用して引っ掛けて返すのは05よりもやりやすい。

  一方ループを始めとした回転量は05には劣る。
  攻撃の05か安定の64のイメージ。

  2023/12/06

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	9
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Zhang Jike ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  3

1. 1
2. 2
3. Next >