's profile

's profile
Gender Male
Age U40
Experience 4〜5 years
  • Use racket, rubber

    1. CARBONADO 145
      Racket

      CARBONADO 145

      For the new Carbonado blades we have taken carbon blade manufacturing to a new level by using a m...
    2. Evolution MX-S
      Rubber (Front)

      Evolution MX-S

      This spin-oriented dynamic version possesses a much longer bat/ball contact time thanks to the es...
    3. Regalis Red
      Rubber (Back)

      Regalis Red

      The new, offensive rubber with built-in speed-glue effect „Made in Japan“ has been developed with...

User review

  • Super Anti

    User review

    At the back, it was used for the first time anti-rubber (thick). Block, firmly stopped, because the knuckle throw-in, unless it is an angle strike, will take the easy point. However, the angle or bad, when the swing is bad, since the outrageous throw-in, but is to get used to is the need to practice, once familiar, is quite interesting enjoy rubber. If the swipe, strike firmly smash. "Anti-power" of YASAKA was also used, but I think I prefer the split.

    See original review

    2016/01/21
    Overall
    5/10
    Speed
    1
    Spin
    1
    Control
    3

    Recomend racket ALLROUND EVOLUTION

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • Ovtcharov Carbospeed

    User review

    I used it either hard or large.
    In the rigid type I stuck double-sided thick tension rubber to 92 grams, so I felt really heavy, but personally the momentum is more impressive than I imagined.
    In Large, I felt very gripy to grab the ball and it was a very easy to hit shot feeling.
    It's a very nice racket, if you lose a little weight and it's light weight,
    Grip design is cool.
    Because the blade is slightly big, I think that I can not recommend it for those who do not like heavy rackets.

    See original review

    2018/10/14
    Overall
    7/10
    Speed
    9
    Spin
    7
    Control
    7
    Touch
    7
    Hardness Little hard

    Recommend rubber(Front) Fastarc G-1

    Recommend rubber(Back) V>01 Stiff

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • ANNSORT

    User review

    Because it is not a tension rubber, it is a rubber that is very easy to control without blowing off.
    Hardness is also not too soft, I think whether it is recommended in either foreback.
    Although the rotation is reasonable, although the speed is somewhat unsatisfactory, it is a place that can not be denied, but because it is a very balanced one for reasonable reasons, it is whether it is a rubber attached as a beginner to a beginner?

    See original review

    2017/06/10
    Overall
    5/10
    Speed
    3
    Spin
    5
    Control
    7
    Hardness Little soft

    Recomend racket Core 7 OFF+

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • XLB

    User review

    I purchased it for large balls, but I used it for a hard type thought.
    Sphere separation is somewhat faster, but controllability is reasonable, so it is very useful GOOD!
    Smash is fast and fast, the drive can be linear high-speed drive.
    The hitting sound comes out high tone with metal tick peculiar to the carbon racket.
    Anyway it will fly, I think that it fits for people with fast swing speed.
    As it is quite an interesting racket, what will happen if you paste rubber for LB ... (haha)

    See original review

    2017/06/10
    Overall
    7/10
    Speed
    7
    Spin
    5
    Control
    5
    Touch
    5
    Hardness Little hard

    Recommend rubber(Front) TeruRyu

    Recommend rubber(Back) ANNSORT

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • Swat Carbon

    User review

    I recently used an inner carbon racquet, listening to the impression that my friend is very good and buying impulses ... (lol)
    I feel that it is a feature of outer carbon, the separation of the ball is slightly faster.
    Drive is easy to hang so much, smashing will be a fairly fast hitting if swiped.
    Regarding Saab, depending on how to put out the racket it will be over-taste! I feel that it will be okay if you get used to it, including the reception.
    Although it is a racket with excellent cost performance, attacks from the backwards are evaluated △, feeling a little unsatisfactory can not be denied.
    Because the weight is light, even women can swing blunt and I think that it is a gem that exerts its performance only as much as it shakes.
    Because I felt that it would not suit me personally, I was considering it as a racket for large. (sweat)

    See original review

    2017/05/03
    Overall
    4/10
    Speed
    3
    Spin
    3
    Control
    5
    Touch
    5
    Hardness Little soft

    Recommend rubber(Front) TeruRyu

    Recommend rubber(Back) ANNSORT

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  1. « First
  2. < Previous
  3. 11
  4. 12
  5. 13
  6. 14
  7. 15
  8. 16
  9. 17
  10. 18
  11. 19
  12. Next >
  13. Last »

Top Players

Country

Style

Welcome to the table tennis Navi!

Sign up!