30 man's profile

30 man's profile
Gender Male
Age U30
Experience 11〜20 years
  • Use racket, rubber

    1. LUDEACK
      Racket

      LUDEACK

      This blade is 7-ply powerful wood. You will be able to control the ball even in toughest rallies....
    2. Bluefire M2
      Rubber (Front)

      Bluefire M2

      DONIC Bluefire M2Characteristics: Excellent balance between speed, catapult effect and feel. Reco...
    3. Rakza X Soft
      Rubber (Back)

      Rakza X Soft

      RAKZA X is the first rubber with NSS (New Surface System), Yasaka’s new production process to imp...

User review

  • LUDEACK

    User review

    I used to use outer-carbon blades, but once the plastic ball came in I started worrying about hardness, so I switched to the All-Round Evolution. I liked the soft feel, but it didn't have enough bounce, so I went looking for a blade that bounced more than that one, wasn't too heavy, and still had a soft feel — and that's how I ended up with the Rudeack.
    I had the impression that 7-ply blades are heavy and hard, but this one has an overall soft feel and spin is easy to put on, so I could switch over from the 5-ply All-Round Evolution without any discomfort. (Personally I find the Swat and Acoustic soft too, but they have a slight surface hardness to the feel, if that makes sense.) Compared to the 5-ply, the bounce is up several notches, and I got fast balls even from close to mid-distance from the table. Also, oddly, it doesn't bounce too much over the table, and stops were easier to do than with the 5-ply.
    What surprised me most, though, was how easy blocking is. Since the blade isn't too thick or too thin,
    control is easy and I never feel pushed back.
    The price is a bit on the high side, but I think it suits anyone looking for a soft 7-ply blade that balances spin and speed. Personally I feel the Fortius FT is the blade that takes the Rudeack and bumps up the bounce and weight a bit more for extra power.

    See original review

    2017/01/18
    Overall
    9/10
    Speed
    8
    Spin
    9
    Control
    9
    Touch
    9
    Hardness Little soft

    Recommend rubber(Front) TENERGY 80

    Recommend rubber(Back) Rakza X Soft

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • ROSEWOOD NCT V

    User review

    Since the top ply is on the harder side and the inside is softer, the feel is on the firmer side for light-to-medium hits, probably because of that top ply. On harder hits, the impact reaches the inner layers too, so the hardness eases up and the feel gets a bit softer. That said, even on hard hits, it still feels a bit stiffer compared to typical 5-ply blades like the Allround Evolution or Korbel.
    On the flip side, it doesn't have that much bounce, which made it easy to control — about the same as the Allround Evolution. Because it doesn't bounce much in particular, the short game is easy, and flicks, redirects, and pushes went where I aimed pretty easily.
    If you're good at brushing the ball, I think you'll find it very easy to put a lot of spin on.

    See original review

    2017/02/08
    Overall
    7/10
    Speed
    6
    Spin
    9
    Control
    9
    Touch
    6
    Hardness Little hard
    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • ROZENA

    User review

    I put it on a 7-ply blade.
    When I touched it, honestly it didn't feel as soft as I'd heard beforehand, but once I actually hit with it, it was softer than expected — it felt less like the sheet is grabbing the ball and more like the whole rubber grips it.
    Compared to 80 and Roundell, it's softer than 80, and pretty much the same as Roundell — just a tiny, tiny difference, I'd say. As for bounce, it bounces more than Roundell, and feels like 80's bounce toned down slightly with better control added, but it still bounced more than I expected. 80 has more grip on the ball and gets more spin, but Rozena still has that gripping feel too. In my case though, for backhand drives against backspin I usually catch the ball with the sheet, and this rubber was harder to use that way. Rather than feeling like a toned-down Tenergy, it felt more like Roundell with Tenergy's distinctive grip, spring sponge, and bounce added on top. I think it'll suit people who prefer medium hardness or something a bit softer, more than people who like hard rubbers like 05 or the 47-degree range.

    See original review

    2017/04/16
    Overall
    5/10
    Speed
    8
    Spin
    5
    Control
    6
    Hardness Little soft

    Recomend racket LUDEACK

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • Rakza X Soft

    User review

    Judging from the sponge hardness, the sheet is the same as Rakza X — a bit on the firm side with good grip — and the sponge is fairly soft, so it's easy to handle even without a lot of power. Compared to the FX line it's harder, but not too hard, right in the medium range. Because of that, I think it's easy to use on both forehand and backhand for intermediate players or people who don't get along with hard rubbers.
    If instead of just brushing the ball you get a bit more of a sinking feel (sort of?), you get more spin and it's easier to control.
    Apart from topspin drives, the soft sponge makes blocking and short-game drives over the table easy — the short-game topspin drive especially gets stable once you're conscious of brushing the ball, since the grip is so good.
    Because the grip is so good, it's also very sensitive to the opponent's spin, which I noticed a lot.

    See original review

    2017/02/06
    Overall
    8/10
    Speed
    8
    Spin
    8
    Control
    7
    Hardness Little soft

    Recomend racket LUDEACK

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • Bluefire M2

    User review

    Both the sponge and the sheet are medium — not too hard, not too soft.
    Compared to the Bluefire JP02, the gaps between the pimples on the sheet look a bit wider, and the feel on contact seemed a touch softer. That said, it's not mushy at all — it still has some backbone, so you can brush it too. The JP series has better grip on the sheet, so if you're someone who brushes with a harder sheet like the Rakza series, I think the JP series would be easier to use and spin more.
    As for bounce, it's only slightly faster than the JP, and I didn't notice a huge difference overall, but it's easy to control the power behind your shots and it doesn't bounce oddly, so it's easy to handle. There's a real sense of the ball "grabbing" the sponge, so it spins quite a lot, and it was easier than the JP to use a technique where you sink the ball in rather than just brushing it.
    Until now I thought Rasant Grip had a feel closest to Tenergy 80, but this one is even closer to 80 — it's like the bounce was toned down a little and the "grab" feeling was strengthened instead.

    See original review

    2017/06/09
    Overall
    9/10
    Speed
    9
    Spin
    10
    Control
    9
    Hardness Little soft

    Recomend racket LUDEACK

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3

Top Players

Country

Style