NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  GORIKI KAISOKU

  

  I think that it is a rubber that has quite a characteristic.

  The category of rubber is not high tension type, but rubber belonging to high elasticity
  So even if you swing normally, you will not fly upwards at all. Just rub it
  The seat catches more than I thought.
  And since the response (the flying reaction since the ball hits) is very fast
  Meat and smash are easy to do. But as the seat catches up earlier
  Fast and low tackle is also possible.

  Of course there are disadvantages. The flight distance is not at all, the rubber itself
  Because the momentum is weak, the power is hard to come out.

  To summarize the above

  ■ Benefits
  · Meat, smash is very easy to do
  · It is possible to get caught more than it looks, so it is possible to have low and fast tokki
  · Rubber itself does not play, so it's easy to stop at the same motion
  - Although stuck is good, since the rubber itself is insensitive to rotation, it is easy to receive by simply hitting it

  Disadvantage
  · Flight distance is not good
  · Power does not come out
  · Vulnerable to long serve system (especially lower system)
  · It falls when it hits too thickly

  It is unsuitable for athletes who can attack with both hands, but for athletes who will be detained in the fore without mistakes of backing
  Once recommended!

  See original review Hide original review

  かなり特徴があるラバーかと思います。

  ラバーのカテゴリーがハイテンション系ではなく、高弾性に属するラバー
  なので普通にスイングしても上方向には全く飛びません。ただ擦ると
  思った以上にシートが引っ掛かります。
  そしてレスポンス（ボールが当たってからの飛ぶ反応）が非常に速いため
  ミートやスマッシュはやりやすいです。ですが先ほどシートが引っ掛かるので
  速くて低いツッツキも可能です。

  もちろんデメリットもあります。飛距離が全くでない、ラバーそのものが
  弾みが弱いため威力が出にくい。

  以上をまとめると

  ■メリット
  ・ミート、スマッシュが非常にしやすい
  ・見た目以上に引っ掛かりがいいので低くて速いツッツキが可能
  ・ラバーそのものが弾まないため、同じモーションでストップしやすい
  ・引っ掛かりはいいがラバーそのものは回転に鈍感なので当てるだけでレシーブしやすい

  ■デメリット
  ・飛距離がでない
  ・威力が出ない
  ・ロングサーブ系に弱い（特に下系）
  ・厚く当てすぎると落ちてしまう

  両ハンドで攻める選手には不向きですがバックをミスなくフォアで仕留める選手には
  一度おすすめです！

  2018/11/06

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	7
  Control	7
  Hardness	Hard

  Recomend racket Mizutani Jun ZLC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  7

• 

  DNA PRO H

  

  It was a hard image with a hardness of 50 degrees if I had a test hit of DNA and used, but when hit, the sheet was soft or softer than expected and very easy to hit. If the weight was made in Germany, it was not heavy and I felt it was close to the rubber I had hit sometime before I was hitting while thinking that it was close to the feeling of hitting the "Fastark G1". Maybe the design of the sponge is very similar and the DNA will bite and catch better on the sheet, so I think that the flying distance will come out even if it goes down. I think if you are a Fastark G1 enthusiast and want to get a higher arc and flying distance, you can do it without discomfort. If you want to get power at a lower price than the Fastark G1, please try it by all means ♪

  See original review Hide original review

  DNAの試打会があり使わせてもらったら硬度50度とハードなイメージでしたが打つとシートが柔らかいのか想像以上に柔らかく非常に打ちやすかったです。重さもドイツ製にしたら重く感じず打ってる途中からなんだか前に打ったことのあるラバーに近いなーって思いながら打っていたら「ファスタークG1」の打球感にそっくりでした。たぶんスポンジの設計が非常に似ておりシートはDNAのほうが食い込みと引っ掛かりがいいので下がっても飛距離が出ると思います。ファスタークG1愛好家でより高い弧線と飛距離を出したい選手には違和感なく以降が出来るかと思います。ファスタークG1より値段も若干ですが安く威力を出したい方は是非とも試してみてください♪

  2020/02/04

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	8
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket Mizutani Jun ZLC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  5

• 

  DIGNICS 05

  

  [Please note that it is a post when there is no workmanship] 2019, when "Dignonics 05", the latest innovation in table tennis, was released. As I continued to use the Tenaji 05 and there was no inconvenience, I was confused without changing it, but I made a debut from last month (June). Honestly, I think that the quality of one ball is higher than that of Tenaji. But! ! However, they tend to be over-driven when serving or making a small connection (Choridora). There is a sense that the rubber bites in and makes corrections for inquiries, tsutsuki smashers and counters, but I think that it is necessary to get used to the technique of putting it firmly in the table and the technique of hooking and rotating. I think this bouncy sense is the new sense of Dignus 05 so please try by all means ♪

  See original review Hide original review

  【技量がないうえでの投稿なのでご了承ください】卓球界の新機軸となる「ディグニクス05」が発売された2019年。テナジー05を使い続けて不便性もないのでそのまま乗り換えずにと迷っていましたが先月（6月）からデビューしました。正直テナジーと比べ【威力】は増して1球1球の質は高くなったと思います。が！！しかし、サーブやちょっとした繋ぎ（チョリドラ）をする際に弾み過ぎてしまう傾向があります。引き合いやツッツキ強打やカウンターはラバーが食い込んで補正してくれる感覚がありますが台の中にしっかり納める技術や回転を掛けて繋げる技術には慣れが必要かと思います。この弾む感覚こそがディグニクス05の新しい感覚なんだろうと思いますので是非とも試してみてください♪

  2019/07/04

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	9
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket Mizutani Jun ZLC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  5

• 

  Mizutani Jun Super ZLC

  

  Currently I use the normal Mizutani Kei ZLC, but I purchase the SURPER ZLC that I want to improve the power with the same shot feel.

  Feeling at impact: Normal ZLC is suitable for outerwear, but there is also a tendency to "turn", but SURPER ZLC is considerably stiff due to the doubling of special material. Jumping out after hitting was quick too, and it was a feeling that it was lacking in the sense of putting on rotation. The only thing that was good was that it was the "sweet spot" with the same impetus for any area of the racket.

  ■ Compatibility with rubber: I used 05, but it was too stiff to use SURPER ZLC and it was not possible to use it at all honestly because it was brand new. Therefore, I felt that it was so easy to be surprised if I hit it at 80, so I thought it would be easier to hit it with FX series, 64, and Rosena.

  ■ Summary

  ・ Because the racket itself is very far off the ball, people who are weak are facing
  ・ Especially for front users because it is hard and bouncy
  ・ It is easy to demonstrate the performance of the racket itself if it is pasted FX system
  ・ It seems that it is unsuitable for hard hitter (I can not convey the feeling of hitting anyway)

  See original review Hide original review

  現在ノーマル水谷隼ZLCを使っていますが、同じ打球感で威力をアップさせたくSURPER ZLCを購入。

  ■打球感：ノーマルZLCの方はアウターながら適度に「しなり」もあり回転が掛けやすいですが、SURPER ZLCは特殊素材の編み込みが2倍のせいか相当硬かったです。当たってからの飛び出しも早く、回転を掛ける感覚に乏しい感じでした。ただ良かった点としてラケットのどのエリアに当てても同じ弾みで全てが「スイートスポット」でした。

  ■ラバーとの相性：05を使っていますが、新品の張りたてでSURPER ZLCを使うと硬すぎて正直全く使えなかったです。その為、80にして打ったらビックリするくらい打ちやすかったのでFXシリーズや64、ロゼナにするともっと打ちやすいような気はしました。

  ■まとめ

  ・ラケット自体が非常に球離れが良いので非力な人のほうが向いてる
  ・硬くて弾むので特に表ユーザー向き
  ・FX系を貼ったほうがラケットそのものの性能を発揮しやすい
  ・ハードヒッターに不向きかと思われます（とにかく打球感が伝わらない）

  2019/04/19

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	6
  Control	6
  Touch	6
  Hardness	Hard

  Recommend rubber（Front） TENERGY 05

  Recommend rubber（Back） TENERGY 05

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  5