NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  HUGO CALDERANO FOCO OFF+

  

  I have the same 5-piece plywood corber, but purchase because momentum is unsatisfactory. Because the board thickness was as thick as 7 mm, the shot feeling was close to that of a veneer. Do not lose to special materials Bounce. I think the merit of No. 1 is that it is very easy to receive. The foreflick became very stable. Weight is also light, so double-sided tenazy does not matter at all. There is only a calderano player to use.

  See original review Hide original review

  同じ5枚合板のコルベルを持っていますが弾みが物足りないため購入。板厚が7㎜と厚いため打球感は単板に近い感じがしました。特殊素材に負けない位弾みます。１番のメリットはレシーブがとてもしやすい事だと思います。フォアフリックがとても安定して入るようになりました。重量も軽いため両面テナジーでも全く問題ないです。カルデラノ選手が使用するだけあります。

  2018/04/24

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber（Front） TENERGY 05

  Recommend rubber（Back） TENERGY 80

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  18

• 

  DIGNICS 05

  

  It is impression that changed from Tenergy 05 and used for 3 months.
  Although it is harder than Tenergy in the catalog value, it does not feel that hard when you actually hit it. The flying distance comes out and the rotation is extremely expensive. Thanks to this, the number of over-missing blocks has greatly increased.
  I heard that some people did not fit and returned to Tenaji, but I think that it is compatible with rackets. It is my impression, but if you hit it with a special material racket that is too bouncy, a good ball will go, but you will not feel much shot feeling. Conversely, the inner system that does not play much or a simple wood racket can be hit with a pretty good feeling. By the way, I am 5 plywood.
  Finally, as others have said, it feels longer than Tenergy. We use for three months, but are considerably caught in degree that surface became slightly white. Considering this, I think that Diagnostics 05 is good in terms of performance and cost performance. I'm sorry for a long sentence.

  See original review Hide original review

  テナジー05から変更して３ヶ月使用した感想です。
  カタログ値ではテナジーより硬いですが実際打ってみるとそこまで硬く感じません。飛距離も出るし何より回転がものすごくかかります。おかげでブロックをオーバーミスさせる本数が大分増えました。
  人によっては合わなくてテナジーに戻したという話を聞きますがラケットとの相性もあると思います。あくまで私の感想ですが弾みすぎる特殊素材ラケットで打つと良いボールは行くのですが打球感があまり感じられません。逆にあまり弾まないインナー系やただの木材ラケットの方がかなり良い感覚で打てます。ちなみに私は５枚合板です。
  最後に他の人も言っていますがテナジーより寿命が長く感じられます。３ヶ月使ってますが若干表面白くなった程度でかなりひっかかります。この事を考えれば性能面及びコスパ面でもディグニクス05が良いと思います。長文失礼しました。

  2019/12/26

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	10
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket HUGO CALDERANO FOCO OFF+

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  9

• 

  HYBRID K1J

  

  We used tenergy 05 all the time, but we were washed away by adhesive rubber special feature of table tennis kingdom and purchased.
  As other people mentioned, I was easy to use even as a tension user, and I really liked it because of its unique feel at impact. However, it was fun to use but I couldn't win the game at all. After all, I could not get points at all because I could not get the drive speed. After that, the receiving ball of the opponent also runs out as much as the serve breaks, so the third ball became difficult. I thought that you could use it only if you had a considerable impact like normal adhesive.
  I think it's better not to stick your hand on the sticky side. I think you need to be patient and use it for a long time no matter how much you lose. I loved the shot feeling.

  See original review Hide original review

  ずっとテナジー05使ってましたが卓球王国の粘着ラバー特集に流されて購入しました。
  他の方々がおっしゃる通りテンションユーザーの私でも使いやすく、独特の打球感覚でかなり好きでした。しかし使うのは楽しいですが試合では全く勝てなくなりました。やはりドライブスピードが出ないため点が全くとれなくなりました。あとはサーブが切れる分相手のレシーブも切れてくるため三球目が難しくなりました。通常の粘着同様かなりのインパクトを持った方じゃないと使えないと思いました。
  下手の横好きで粘着に手を出さない方が良いと思います。あとはどれだけ負けても根気強く長く使う覚悟が必要だと思います。打球感覚は大好きでした。

  2019/12/26

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket HUGO CALDERANO FOCO OFF+

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1