NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  BYPE

  

  *Using the 2.0mm thickness
  For the price, I think the basic performance is quite good. It bounces well, and the energy efficiency seems good too. Spin also grips plenty well thanks to the quality of the sheet.
  That said, the sponge feels stiff for a 45° rubber, and the ball leaves the rubber faster than the hardness rating would suggest, which made it feel hard to use. It gives the sensation that the sponge launches the ball before the sheet gets to fully do its job — maybe that means if you want that gripping feel, you should go with the SFX instead — but that leaves me doubting the marketing claim about "of course, the technique to add spin." Maybe they were trying to balance it with meet-shot technique too, but personally it felt half-baked, and honestly a bit disappointing performance-wise given the price...
  Overall, I felt that if you prioritize spin, the SFX or the Hexer series would be better, and if you prioritize meet shots, you'd be better off picking something from another maker (like Rigan or Mantra).

  See original review Hide original review

  ※厚さ2.0を使用
  　価格の割に基本性能は高いと思います。よく弾みますし、エネルギー効率も良さそうです。回転もシートの質が良いので十分に掛かります。
  　ただ、45度にしてはスポンジが固く感じられ、硬度以上に球離れが早くて使いにくいと感じました。シートの性能を発揮しきる前にスポンジが飛ばしてしまう感覚で、掛ける感覚を重視するならSFXの方を選んでほしいということなのかもしれませんが、謳い文句の「回転をかける技術はもちろんのこと」には疑問が残ります。ミート技術との両立を図りたかったのかもしれませんが個人的には中途半端に感じられ、価格を考慮しても残念性能だなぁ、と・・・。
  　総じて、回転重視ならSFXの方かヘキサー系を、ミート重視なら他メーカー製(ライガンやマントラなど)を選んだ方が良さげだと思いました。

  2025/01/03

  Overall	6/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	6
  Control	6
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket QUARTET AFC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  RESONATE GO

  

  This is the outer version of the Rozena GI, but I didn't feel much of a real difference from the Rozena GI beyond the feel being slightly harder and the ball coming off just a bit faster. After using the Rozena GI for half a year, I bought this one out of curiosity to compare, and my honest reaction was "either one is fine..." If you're picturing a typical outer carbon blade, you'll probably be let down - for better or worse. I do think it's nice that if you buy either the GI or GO for the grip shape and aren't satisfied with the feel, you can consider picking up the other one as a kind of fine-tuning option.

  See original review Hide original review

  リゾネイトGIのアウター版ですが、リゾネイトGIより少し打球感が固く、少し球離れが早い程度で、大きな違いは感じられませんでした。リゾネイトGIを半年使った後に興味本位で買って比較してみた感想が「どっちでも良い・・・」でした。一般的なアウターカーボンを想像すると肩透かしを食らうと思います。良くも悪くも。グリップ目当てでGI・GOどちらかを購入し、打球感に満足できなかったら微調整感覚でもう一方を購入することを検討できる点は良いと思います。

  2025/01/03

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Touch	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• Ventus Speed

  

  *Using max thickness
  Has it changed since the TSP days? Back then, my impression was that the sheet sank in more than it needed to, without much spin to show for it, and I remember thinking they should just make the sheet the same as Ventus Super. Buying it again after a while alongside Limber, the sheet seems to have become the same as Ventus Extra's - maybe? - and it's become much easier to use.
  In terms of feel, it's basically a softer version of Ventus Extra, and since I found Extra hard and heavy, this hits a sweet spot that I'm really happy with. It grabs the ball firmly, spins it well, and draws a proper arc. Being able to hit that kind of ball consistently is reassuring. It's not all upsides though - the spin isn't amazing, the speed is about average, and the weight is on the heavier side, so I can't recommend it unconditionally. But I do want people who are drawn to Ventus Extra's performance and value but have given up on it because it's hard and heavy to give this one a try.
  *I'd also recommend the Limber.

  See original review Hide original review

  ※厚さMAXを使用
  　TSP時代から変わったのでしょうか。当時の感想としては、無駄にシートの食い込みが良く、その割に回転が掛からず、スーパーヴェンタスと同じシートにしてくれ・・・と思っていました。久しぶりにLimberと一緒に購入したところ、シートがヴェンタスExtraと同じ？シートになったようで、だいぶ使い勝手が良くなりました。
  　感覚的には、まんまヴェンタスExtraの柔らかい版で、Extraは固い・重いと感じていただけに丁度良くて嬉しい限りです。しっかりと球を掴み、しっかり回転が掛かり、しっかり弧線を描く。そんなボールを安定して打てるので安心できます。良いこと尽くしではなく、凄い回転が掛かるわけではなく、スピードも標準的、重量が重めと手放しにオススメできるラバーではありませんが、ヴェンタスExtraの性能やコスパに魅かれつつも固い・重いの面で断念している層に使ってみてほしいですね。
  ※Limberの方もオススメです。

  2025/01/03

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	7
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Swat

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  VJ>07 STIFF

  

  *Using max thickness
  I tried the Ventus Stiff and Vega Japan and liked them, but the weight bothered me, so I bought this one since it's also 45-degree hardness but lighter. I tried it on both forehand and backhand, and overall it's not bad, but I found it tricky to use.
  As other reviews mention, the arc is generally low overall — it doesn't generate crazy spin or produce especially fast shots. That said, the sheet is excellent for the price, and since the sponge feels like a spring sponge, if you really sink the ball in and create that stretch-and-snap effect, you can get a high arc with a lot of spin on the ball. Also, thanks to the sheet, I felt it was easy to produce good serves.
  The base performance is probably high, but compared to what people call the "tolerance" of the Rozena, it doesn't seem to have that same forgiveness, so it feels harder to consistently produce a good ball. Well, even when you do get a good shot out of it, it's about on par with or slightly above the Rozena, but considering the price, I don't think it's a bad rubber.
  By the way, it's pretty light for a recent tension rubber. At max thickness, it was about 3 grams lighter than the Rozena.

  See original review Hide original review

  ※厚さMAXを使用
  　ヴェンタスStiffやヴェガジャパンを使ってみて良いと感じたものの重さが気になり、同じく硬度45度で軽めのラバーということで購入。フォアとバックの両方で試してみましたが、全体的に悪くないものの、扱いが難しいと感じました。
  　他の方のレビューにある通り、弧線は全体的に低めで、凄い回転が掛かるわけでも速い球を出せるわけでもありません。ただ、シートが価格の割に優秀で、スポンジがスプリングスポンジっぽいので、しっかりと食い込ませて引き攣れを起こすことができれば弧線が高く回転が掛かった球を出せます。また、シートのおかげでサーバは良い球を出しやすいと感じました。
  　恐らく基本性能は高いでしょうが、ロゼナでいうところのトレランス(寛容度)が高くなくて良い球を出しにくい印象です。まぁ、その良い球を出せたとてロゼナと同等か少し上というレベルですが、価格を考慮すると悪いラバーではないと思いました。
  　ちなみに、最近のテンションラバーにしては結構軽いです。厚さMAX同士でロゼナより3グラムほど軽かったです。

  2025/01/03

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	6
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket QUARTET AFC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

• Ventus Spin

  

  *Using max thickness
  I'd been leaning too much on the automatic feel of Rozena on my backhand, so I bought this to retrain myself from scratch. It's basically the Ventus Extra at 40 degrees hardness. It's exactly that, nothing more, nothing less. It's really plain, but that's what's good about it.
  It has that ball-gripping feel typical of the Ventus series, while also showing some insensitivity to strong spin, so receiving in particular is stable and you can play with peace of mind. You can't put much spin on it and it's hard to produce fast balls, but for its hardness and price, I think it's ideal if you prioritize stability.
  By the way, I also felt it could work on the forehand. If you move even a little away from the table it's over, but as long as you relax and play close to the table it was fine. Well, it's not really a rubber I'd want to use on the forehand though...

  See original review Hide original review

  ※厚さMAXを使用
  バック面は普段ロゼナのオートマ感に甘えてばかりだったので、１から鍛えなおすために購入。ヴェンタスExtraを硬度40度にしたバージョンですね。それ以上でも、それ以下でもない感じです。凄く地味ですが、それが良い。
  ヴェンタスシリーズ特有のボールを掴む感覚がありつつも強い回転に対しては鈍感さを見せるので、特にレシーブが安定し、安心してプレーできます。強い回転を掛けられませんし、速いボールを出しにくいですが、硬度や価格なりに安定性を重視する場合に最適だと思います。
  ちなみに、私はフォアでも使えると感じました。少しでも台から離れたら終わりですが、力を抜いて台の近くで戦う分には問題ありませんでした。まぁ、フォアに使いたいと思うラバーではありませんが・・・。

  2025/01/03

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	5
  Spin	7
  Control	8
  Hardness	Soft

  Recomend racket MA LIN EXTRA OFFENSIVE

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2