Pei's profile
Gender | Male |
---|---|
Age | U20 |
Experience | 6〜10 years |
User review
-
-
It is the outer version of the Resonate GI, but the feel of the shot is a little harder than the Resonate GI, and the ball leaves the club a little sooner, but I didn't feel a big difference. After using the Resonate GI for half a year, I bought it out of curiosity and compared it, and my impression was "either one is fine...". If you imagine a typical outer carbon, you will be disappointed. For better or worse. I think it's good that you can buy either the GI or GO for the grip, and if you are not satisfied with the shot feel, you can consider buying the other one as a fine-tuning feeling.
Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness Little hard
-
-
I have been searching for a racket with a thick and flat grip, a center of gravity near the hand, and a special material (inner), and I finally found one. I have been using it since it was first released, but for some reason it feels like an inner version of Viscaria, which no other manufacturer has released (although GO is more similar). However, the biggest difference from Viscaria is not only that it is an inner, but also that the speed is relatively slow due to the difference in material. I feel that it may be inferior to 5-ply wood rather than 7-ply wood. In return, when applying spin, you can feel the good ball holding like a fiber-type, but at the end it has a carbon-type feel, so it is easy to apply spin and attack. Recommended for those who play a style of pushing by applying spin with the face of the racket horizontally.
*When comparing the grip (feel of holding), Viscaria feels more comfortable, so I would like Tamas to release an inner version of Viscaria. Resonate GI is also good, but it is linear and I feel that it is inferior to the feeling of Viscaria's sticking.Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness Little hard
-
-
*Maximum thickness used
I tried Ventus Stiff and Vega Japan and found them to be good, but I was concerned about their weight, so I bought this rubber because it is also light and has a hardness of 45 degrees. I tried it on both the forehand and backhand, and although it was not bad overall, I felt that it was difficult to handle.
As other people's reviews have said, the arc is generally low, so it doesn't spin very well or produce fast balls. However, the sheet is excellent for the price, and the sponge is like a spring sponge, so if you can bite into it firmly and cause a twitch, you can produce a ball with a high arc and spin. Also, thanks to the sheet, I felt that it was easy for the server to produce good balls.
The basic performance is probably high, but the tolerance (forgiveness) of Rosena is not high, so it is difficult to produce good balls. Well, even if you can produce good balls, it is at the same level as Rosena or slightly higher, but considering the price, I don't think it is a bad rubber.
By the way, it is quite light for a recent tension rubber. It was about 3 grams lighter than Rosena when both are at the maximum thickness.Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Recomend racket QUARTET AFC
-
-
*Maximum thickness used
I usually rely on the automatic feel of Rosena for the back side, so I bought this to train it from scratch. It's a version of Ventus Extra with a hardness of 40 degrees. It's neither more nor less than that. It's very plain, but that's what's good about it.
It has the feeling of grabbing the ball that is unique to the Ventus series, but it is insensitive to strong spin, so you can play with confidence, especially with stable reception. It's difficult to apply strong spin and it's hard to produce fast balls, but I think it's ideal for those who value stability for its hardness and price.
By the way, I felt that it could also be used for forehand. If you move away from the table even a little, it's over, but there was no problem as long as you relaxed and fought close to the table. Well, it's not a rubber you want to use for your forehand...
Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Soft
Recomend racket MA LIN EXTRA OFFENSIVE
-
-
※Maximum thickness used
I wonder if it has changed since the TSP era. At the time, my impression was that the sheet was unnecessarily good at biting into the ball, but it didn't spin, so I thought it would be better if it had the same sheet as the Super Ventus. I bought it together with Limber for the first time in a while, and it seems that the sheet is the same as the Ventus Extra? It's become much easier to use.
It feels like a soft version of Ventus Extra, and I'm happy that it's just right because I felt that the Extra was hard and heavy. It grips the ball firmly, spins well, and draws a solid arc. I can hit such balls stably, so I can rest assured. It's not all good, it doesn't spin very well, the speed is standard, and it's heavy, so it's not a rubber that I can recommend without reservation, but I would like those who are attracted to the performance and cost performance of Ventus Extra but have given up because it's hard and heavy to try it.
※Limber is also recommended.Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Recomend racket Swat
Racket
Producer
Grip
Review Ranking
Rubber
Producer
Type
-
Get the Amazon gift card at a Review!
20 points are added in the post. You can replace it by Amazon Gift Card worth $5.00 with 1000 points.