BYPE

Everyone's rating [Hardness] Medium hardness
[Performance] Control and Speed to have excellent
BYPE

(Click to zoom the photo)

Averages reviews points

  • Rating: 6.75 / 10
  • 4 reviews
    • Speed:7.25
    • Spin:6.25
    • Control:7.75

    Reviews of BYPE. Players who use Rubber evaluate various points such as hardness of the sponge, speed, control, spin, and feel at impact thoroughly.

    • Pimples in

    Specifications

    Price
    4,600 Yen(Include tax 5,060 Yen)
    Producer
    Andro
    Product code
    110021104
    Customer Reviews SummaryAI Summary
    While high basic performance and stability are praised, multiple reviews note that this rubber is poorly suited for developing rotational techniques, creating a gap between marketing claims and actual performance. Players seeking rotation emphasis are advised to consider alternative rubbers.
    ■ Frequently Mentioned Points
    • Dull sheet surface provides easy receiving but limited spin ceiling
    • Well-suited for hitting and blocking with better angle adjustment control
    • Hard sponge for 45° range with quick ball departure
    • Relative stability advantage for backhand applications
    • Not recommended for developing rotational technique skills
    ■ Representative Voices
    ▲ PositiveBYPE offers good rebound and high basic performance for its price. It provides greater stability than Lazanter and is recommended for backhand placement.
    ▽ CriticalThe sponge feels harder than typical 45° rubbers with excessively quick ball release. The sponge launches the ball before the sheet fully expresses its performance, making other rubbers more suitable for spin-focused players.

    Reviews by user

    Post a review
    All Month
    • Pei

      Pei (Experience: ６〜１０ years) Feels unbalanced

      Reviews by user

      *Using the 2.0mm thickness
      For the price, I think the basic performance is quite good. It bounces well, and the energy efficiency seems good too. Spin also grips plenty well thanks to the quality of the sheet.
      That said, the sponge feels stiff for a 45° rubber, and the ball leaves the rubber faster than the hardness rating would suggest, which made it feel hard to use. It gives the sensation that the sponge launches the ball before the sheet gets to fully do its job — maybe that means if you want that gripping feel, you should go with the SFX instead — but that leaves me doubting the marketing claim about "of course, the technique to add spin." Maybe they were trying to balance it with meet-shot technique too, but personally it felt half-baked, and honestly a bit disappointing performance-wise given the price...
      Overall, I felt that if you prioritize spin, the SFX or the Hexer series would be better, and if you prioritize meet shots, you'd be better off picking something from another maker (like Rigan or Mantra).

      See original review

      2025/01/03
      All
      6/10
      Speed
      7
      Spin
      6
      Control
      6
      Hardness Little hard

      Racket recommended use QUARTET AFC

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • Amagishi

      Amagishi (Experience: More than ２０ years) A rebound-type rubber with a dull feel

      Reviews by user

      It was 43g at 2.0mm.
      The sheet is unresponsive, so it's not easily affected by the opponent's spin. Even if you try to add your own spin, the ceiling is quite low.
      The trajectory is somewhat straight, and the rebound is decent enough. I felt it suits playing around with angled blocks or knocking the ball with meet shots rather than heavy spin.
      It's in a completely different category from the GTT, and honestly it's not suited as a step-up rubber at all.
      The performance and the marketing don't really match up, do they (lol).

      See original review

      2025/05/22
      All
      7/10
      Speed
      8
      Spin
      4
      Control
      8
      Hardness Little soft

      Racket recommended use AWARD V OFFENSIVE

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!

    • (Experience: ６〜１０ years) More of a flat-hit type?

      Reviews by user

      I used the 1.8mm version.

      The sheet is on the harder side for a 45° rubber, the bounce is so-so, and the sheet is quite dull/unresponsive.
      The upside is that the dullness of the sheet makes it easier to receive serves.
      Even if you get the angle wrong on a push, as long as you don't let it drop, it kind of goes in somehow — maybe that's also because the bounce isn't that strong.

      The problem is spin-based techniques like the topspin drive — especially brushing up against backspin to loop it is harder compared to the Rigan or GTT.
      If you brush it properly it does go in, but the ceiling on how much spin you can generate is pretty low, so as a step-up rubber its direction feels a bit off.

      If your goal is to develop the feel for putting spin on your topspin drive, honestly I'd recommend using a different rubber.

      See original review

      2025/03/26
      All
      5/10
      Speed
      5
      Spin
      5
      Control
      8
      Hardness Little soft

      Racket recommended use Acoustic

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      Andre Ando (Experience: ６〜１０ years)

      Reviews by user

      Comparing this to the Vip 40 and the Rasant.
      First, in terms of bounce, if you hit with a sinking-the-ball style like with the 40, I don't feel like it flies as far. On the backhand, it's easier to get the ball in if you brush it quite a bit more.
      It's quite a bit more stable than the Rasant.
      I'd recommend putting it on your backhand.

      See original review

      2025/03/17
      All
      9/10
      Speed
      9
      Spin
      10
      Control
      9
      Hardness Little soft

      Racket recommended use Acoustic

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    Post a review

    Top Players

    Country

    Style