NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  Rakza 7

  

  It has a slightly straighter trajectory compared to recent rubbers, and it bounces quite a bit. It has a speedy tension feel to it.

  However, if you ask me if it doesn't spin, it never does, and even if I take it lightly, it responds well, so I can score points with serves and loops.

  The surface felt a little soft and the sponge felt a little hard.
  If you let it dig in and hit it, it will hit with just the right arc, and if you rub it, it will ignore half of your opponent's rotation and hit in a heap, so there is nothing to say.
  Since the distance is quite long, a racket that doesn't bounce that far seems better.

  The performance is right in the middle of modern tension rubbers, so if you are unsure, go for this one! You may be able to choose based on your feelings.

  See original review Hide original review

  最近のラバーと比べてやや直線的な弾道で、結構弾みます。スピード系テンションっぽさがありますね。

  しかし、回転がかからないかと言われれば決してそんなことは無く、薄めに捉えてもしっかり応えてくれるので、サーブやループで点も取れます。

  表面は少し柔らかめでスポンジは少し硬めに感じました。
  食い込ませて打てばちょうどいい弧線で入り、擦れば相手の回転半分無視して山なりに入るので、言う事なしです。
  飛距離は結構出るので、そこまで弾まないラケットの方が良さそうです。

  現代のテンションラバーのちょうど真ん中辺りの性能なので、迷ったらとりあえずコレ！ぐらいの気持ちで選んでもいいかもしれません。

  2023/10/04

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	8
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket MARK WOOD

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  6

• 

  QUANTUMX PRO SOFT

  

  Recommended for people who usually use cheap soft tension such as Vega Europe and do not want to change the hardness but want to upgrade.
  Compared to Vegayoro, the average speed value is one step higher, the maximum speed value is two steps higher, and the rotation is about one step higher.
  The way it flies is more forward than upward, and it is a rubber that is especially excellent for meat type and drive while pushing.

  See original review Hide original review

  普段ヴェガヨーロッパ等の安価な軟テンションを使っている人で、硬度を変えたくないけどランクアップしたい人におススメです。
  ヴェガヨーロと比べるとスピード平均値は一段階、スピード最大値は二段階、回転は一段階ほど上がる印象です。
  飛び方は上にあがるというよりは前に出る感じで、特にミート系や押しながらかけるドライブに優れたラバーです。

  2023/12/25

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	8
  Control	9
  Hardness	Soft

  Recomend racket LIBERTA SOLID Pro

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  HEXER GRIP

  

  I've used it again and again many times.
  In conclusion, it is the best rubber in this price range. Competitive rubbers include Rosena and Vega, but the amount of rotation and grip strength is about two heads higher.
  In terms of speed, Rosena is the best, and the maximum speed is like Hexer Grip.
  Compared to the Vega series, I felt that it was overall superior to everything other than Vega X (excluding peaky items such as def and china).
  It also exceeds the Vega X in terms of rotation, and I have the impression that it will have an advantage over there in terms of ball power.
  It's easy to dig into, has strong catch, and produces a solid and pleasant sound, so I can't find any flaws.
  You can choose from four types of hardness, so you can change it depending on whether you prioritize maximum value or ease of withdrawal.

  If you are a beginner/intermediate player, I think you will make fewer mistakes and be more likely to win if you use the Hexer series rather than the Lazanter R series.

  See original review Hide original review

  もう何回もリピして使ってます。
  結論から言うと、この価格帯のラバーの中で一番いいです。ロゼナやヴェガ等が対抗ラバーですが、回転量とグリップ力は頭二つ分ぐらい抜けてます。
  スピードは出しやすさならロゼナが上、最大値はヘキサーグリップといった感じです。
  ヴェガシリーズと比べるとヴェガⅩ以外には総合的に上回っていると感じました（defやchina等のピーキーな物は除いて）
  ヴェガⅩにも回転量では上回っていて、球威はあちらに軍配が上がるかな～という印象です。
  食い込みやすく、引っかかりも強く、音もしっかり気持ちよく鳴ってくれるので、欠点らしい欠点は見当たりません。
  硬度も四種類選べますので、最大値と引き出しやすさのどちらを優先するかで変えられるのもいい所ですね。

  初中級者ならラザンターのRシリーズ使うより、ヘキサーシリーズ使った方がミスが減り勝ちやすくなると思います。

  2023/12/24

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket LIBERTA SOLID Pro

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  HURRICANE PRO Ⅲ TURBO ORANGE

  

  The grip on the surface is strong and it is easy to create a fairly high arc.
  In terms of performance, I get the impression that it's ``Neo 3 with a little paint''. The hardness was a little harder than Neo 3, but I felt that it was easier to handle because the sponge had more elasticity. I think it's almost upwardly compatible with Neo 3, except for the increased weight.
  I would like people who want to try using adhesive rubber but were unsuccessful because Neo 3 was too slow to fly, to try it.

  See original review Hide original review

  表面のグリップが強く、弧線がかなり高めに作りやすいです。
  性能としてはまんま「ちょっと塗ったネオ3」って印象です。硬さはネオ3よりも少し硬かったんですが、スポンジにコシがある分むしろ扱いやすくなったように感じました。重さが重くなった以外はほぼネオ3の上位互換だと思います。
  粘着ラバー使ってみたいけどネオ3が飛ばなさ過ぎて駄目だった人に是非使ってみて欲しいです。

  2023/12/24

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Hardness	Hard

  Recomend racket LIBERTA SOLID Pro

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  3

• 

  ROZENA

  

  The butterfly standard says it's 35 degrees (about 45 degrees from other manufacturers?), but it felt much softer.
  It bites into the automatic transmission, twitches, and flies away, so it's easy to get caught, but I get the impression that the maximum rotation value isn't that high.
  It digs in and the ball of a certain quality goes automatically, so you can feel good with continuous drives lol
  It is a type of rubber that is more resistant to upper rotation rallies than pulling out in one shot, so it is recommended for back than fore.

  See original review Hide original review

  バタフライ基準で35度(他メーカーの45度くらい？)とありますが、体感もっと柔らかく感じました。
  オートマチックに食い込んで引き攣れて飛んでいくので、掛かりやすいけど回転最大値はそこまで高くない印象です。
  ギュンギュン食い込んで勝手にある程度の質のボールが行ってくれるので、連続ドライブで気持ちよくなれます笑
  一発で抜くよりは上回転ラリーに強いタイプのラバーなので、フォアよりバックにおススメです。

  2023/12/21

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	7
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket LIBERTA SOLID Pro

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  3

1. 1
2. 2
3. 3
4. 4
5. Next >