NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  RIGAN SPIN

  

  When I first tried it, I thought it felt like semi-high elasticity/semi-tension rubber.
  Compared to other rubbers for beginners, it has a smoother hitting feel, and the sheet is clearer, so it doesn't catch the ball too much, and on the other hand, it doesn't slip, so I don't think there are any difficult techniques to use.
  It is recommended to let the sponge bite into the sponge at about 50% of the rotation than to grasp it thinly, as it will be more stable and will have a fair amount of power.

  However, due to the characteristics of the rubber, it is difficult to drive from the middle and the power of the ball, and the maximum rotation value is also low, so I felt that I could not compete with the amount of rotation of serves and loops.
  Suitable for players who score points with stable rallies.

  See original review Hide original review

  まず打ってみて思ったのは、半高弾性・半テンションラバーって感じですね。
  他の初級者向けラバーと比べるとペタッとした打球感で、シートも澄んでいて引っ掛かりが強すぎず、逆に滑ることもなく、やり辛い技術はほとんどないと思います。
  薄くとらえるよりも回転五割前後ぐらいでスポンジに食いこませてやる方が安定もしますしそこそこに威力も出るのでおススメです。

  ただ、ラバーの特性上中陣からのドライブや球威に関しては厳しく、回転の最大値も低めなので、サーブやループの回転量で勝負は出来ないかな～と感じました。
  安定したラリーで点取る選手向けです。

  2023/10/04

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	5
  Spin	7
  Control	9
  Hardness	Soft

  Recomend racket MARK WOOD

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  HURRICANE PRO Ⅲ TURBO ORANGE

  

  The grip on the surface is strong and it is easy to create a fairly high arc.
  In terms of performance, I get the impression that it's ``Neo 3 with a little paint''. The hardness was a little harder than Neo 3, but I felt that it was easier to handle because the sponge had more elasticity. I think it's almost upwardly compatible with Neo 3, except for the increased weight.
  I would like people who want to try using adhesive rubber but were unsuccessful because Neo 3 was too slow to fly, to try it.

  See original review Hide original review

  表面のグリップが強く、弧線がかなり高めに作りやすいです。
  性能としてはまんま「ちょっと塗ったネオ3」って印象です。硬さはネオ3よりも少し硬かったんですが、スポンジにコシがある分むしろ扱いやすくなったように感じました。重さが重くなった以外はほぼネオ3の上位互換だと思います。
  粘着ラバー使ってみたいけどネオ3が飛ばなさ過ぎて駄目だった人に是非使ってみて欲しいです。

  2023/12/24

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Hardness	Hard

  Recomend racket LIBERTA SOLID Pro

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  3

• 

  Bryce High Speed

  

  It's not a rubber used in this day and age.
  First of all, it doesn't lift upwards at all, so you have to use the old-fashioned way of hitting rubber.
  To be honest, the speed is not at the top as long as the Dignics series is available.If you say it's easy to meat, it's easy to do, but in that case, Stiga's Mantra series is cheaper and specializes in making meat easier. Therefore, we recommend them.
  This is the first time I've used rubber where the loop drive doesn't fit this far...on the other hand, it might be difficult to remove because it doesn't rotate.

  See original review Hide original review

  今の時代に使うラバーではないですね、
  まず上に全然持ち上がらないので相当昔のラバーの打ち方をする必要があります
  スピードも正直言ってディグニクスシリーズがある以上トップの方でもないです、ミートがしやすいといえばしやすいですが、それならstigaのマントラシリーズの方が値段も安くミートのしやすさに特化しているため、そちらをおすすめします。
  ループドライブがここまで収まらないラバーは初めてでした・・・逆に回転かかってなくて取りずらいかも？

  2023/12/21

  Overall	4/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	5
  Control	3
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket LIBERTA SOLID Pro

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  3

• 

  ROZENA

  

  The butterfly standard says it's 35 degrees (about 45 degrees from other manufacturers?), but it felt much softer.
  It bites into the automatic transmission, twitches, and flies away, so it's easy to get caught, but I get the impression that the maximum rotation value isn't that high.
  It digs in and the ball of a certain quality goes automatically, so you can feel good with continuous drives lol
  It is a type of rubber that is more resistant to upper rotation rallies than pulling out in one shot, so it is recommended for back than fore.

  See original review Hide original review

  バタフライ基準で35度(他メーカーの45度くらい？)とありますが、体感もっと柔らかく感じました。
  オートマチックに食い込んで引き攣れて飛んでいくので、掛かりやすいけど回転最大値はそこまで高くない印象です。
  ギュンギュン食い込んで勝手にある程度の質のボールが行ってくれるので、連続ドライブで気持ちよくなれます笑
  一発で抜くよりは上回転ラリーに強いタイプのラバーなので、フォアよりバックにおススメです。

  2023/12/21

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	7
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket LIBERTA SOLID Pro

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  3

• 

  Q1

  

  It's a rubber that not many people use, but I think it's one of the highest in the same price range in terms of performance.
  The first thing I noticed was the strength of the seat, which had the same grip as rubber in the 5-6,000 yen list price class.
  Although it is soft, it has good rotational power, and even if it is thin, it does not slip despite its hardness, so it feels safe. I often make mistakes because the arch line doesn't come out when I drop the ball and connect, but this rubber has a modest flight distance and a strong grip, so my mistakes have been greatly reduced.
  I think this is a rubber that is quite suitable for beginners and intermediate players who often play by rotating and connecting.
  If you have a weak impact, you can probably use it in the foreground.
  The only drawback is that since it's Mizuno rubber, production is unstable and it's difficult to stock it in shops...

  See original review Hide original review

  あまり使っている人がいないラバーなんですが、性能的には同価格帯の中でも高い方だと思います。
  まず一番に感じたのはシートの強さで、定価5~6000円クラスのラバーと同等の引っ掛かりがあります。
  柔らかめですが回転力も良好で、薄くとらえても硬度の割に滑らないので安心感ありますね。打点を落としてつなぐときに弧線が出なくてミスすることが結構あるんですが、このラバーは飛距離控えめでグリップ強めなのでミスが大分減りました。
  回転かけてつなぐプレーが多いタイプの初中級者にはかなりマッチしたラバーなんじゃないでしょうか。
  インパクト弱めの方ならフォアでも使えそうですね。
  難点はミズノのラバーなので生産が安定しなくショップに並びづらい所ぐらいです・・・

  2023/12/25

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket LIBERTA SOLID Pro

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. Next >