NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  V>20 Double Extra

  

  The sponge hardness is written as 52.5 degrees, but I don't feel that hardness.
  It can be used by firmly biting it in, and it is highly recommended for people with a strong impact.

  Thanks to the firm rotation and the flight distance not being too long, it has excellent stability.
  In addition, the seat is strong, so it is easy to return the rotation without losing to the opponent's rotation.

  There are no particularly difficult technologies, so I would be very happy if the amount of supply increased.

  See original review Hide original review

  スポンジ硬度が52.5度と書かれていますが、それほどの硬さは感じません
  しっかり食い込ませて使える、インパクトの強い人にとてもオススメできます

  しっかり回転がかかってくれるのと、飛距離が出すぎないおかげで、安定感抜群です
  さらに、シートが強いのもあり、相手の回転に負けず、回転をかけ返しやすいです

  特にやりずらい技術がないので、あとは供給量が多くなってくれると、とても嬉しいですね

  2022/11/14

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket OVTCHAROV Innerforce ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  14

• 

  DIGNICS 80

  

  I felt a little unsatisfactory to use it in the fore
  Not recommended for people who can make a strong impact

  However, the back like me is a perfect rubber for players who want a sense of stability.
  Dig 80 is softer than Dig 05 and 09c and bites in with less force, so it is easy to create a sense of stability in any technique.

  The only bad thing is that it loses to strong impact and the price

  See original review Hide original review

  フォアで使用するには少し物足りなさを感じた
  インパクトがしっかり出せる人にはあまりオススメ出来ない

  しかし、僕のようなバックは安定感が欲しいという選手にはもってこいのラバーです
  ディグ80は、ディグ05や09cに比べて柔らかく、軽い力で食いこんでくれるので、どの技術も安定感が出しやすいです

  悪いところは、強いインパクトには負けてしまうことと、価格のみです

  2022/11/14

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	8
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket OVTCHAROV Innerforce ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  14

• 

  HYBRID K3

  

  Comparison with Lazanta C53

  The performance of the C53 is good when it is hit by a seat and thrown, while the performance of the K3 is good when it is hit firmly and thrown.

  K3 has better flight distance
  I feel that the speed is a little faster than C53
  The amount of rotation does not change
  K3 has a slightly stronger adhesive (not much different) and lasts longer

  The good thing about K3 is that it doesn't lose to the opponent's rotation
  Blocks stop well and can be easily countered

  The K3 is recommended for those who use tension and want a little more rotation, or who want a little more distance when using a chai rubber.

  See original review Hide original review

  ラザンターC53との比較

  C53はシートに引っかけて飛ばすと性能がよく出るのに対し、K3はしっかり当てて飛ばすとよく性能が出る

  飛距離はK3の方が出る
  スピードはC53の方が少し早い気がする
  回転量はあまり変わらない
  K3の方が少し粘着が強め(大きくは変わらない)で長持ちする感覚

  K3の良いところは、相手の回転に負けない
  ブロックはよく止まり、カウンターでかけ返す事が容易にできる

  K3はテンションを使っていて、もう少し回転量が欲しい人、チャイラバを使っていて、もう少し飛距離が欲しい人にオススメです。

  2022/11/14

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket OVTCHAROV Innerforce ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  14

• 

  RASANTER C53

  

  It is a change from hybrid K3, and the comparison target is K3.

  rotation C53=K3
  Speed C53 > K3
  Sheet strength C53

  K3 and C53 are completely different in how to hit.
  With K3, if you rub it against the ball in the same way as with pure adhesive, you will get a good amount of rotation and a good flight distance.
  C53 has the impression that the flight distance drops a little when rubbed.
  It is an impression that goodness comes out if you can hook it firmly on the rubber and fly it by rotation.
  Therefore, I think that the amount of rotation of the serve and loop drive will be quite large.
  The C53 is recommended for those who hit the ball by hooking it firmly onto the sheet.

  See original review Hide original review

  ハイブリッドK3からの変更で、比較対象はK3とします。

  回転 C53=K3
  スピード C53＞K3
  シートの強さ C53＜K3

  K3とC53では、当て方が全然違います。
  K3は、純粘着と同じような当て擦りをすると回転量、飛距離ともに良さが出ます。
  C53は、当て擦りをするとすこし飛距離が落ちる印象です。
  しっかりラバーに引っかけて、回転で飛ばせると良さが出る印象です。
  そのため、サーブとループドライブの回転量はかなり多くなると思います。
  C53は、打つ時にしっかりシートに引っ掛けて飛ばす打ち方をする人にオススメです。

  2022/11/09

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Hardness	Hard

  Recomend racket OVTCHAROV Innerforce ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  14

• 

  OVTCHAROV Innerforce ALC

  

  This is my review after using it for about 10 months.
  If you describe this racket in one word, it is a racket with the contradictory performance of "fitting to bounce".
  Looking at the racket numbers, despite being an inner racket, the momentum is not much different from the outer Zhang Jike ALC due to the plate thickness. (There is a feeling that Ovcharov does not bounce)
  However, since it is an inner, the rotation is obviously more Ovcharov, and there is a feeling that it fits on the table.
  Also, my personal favorite part about this racket is the grip.
  There are different tastes, but Ovcharov's grip is wide and thick, so it has a considerably thicker grip than other rackets.
  It is highly recommended for those who want a solid grip and those with large hands.
  Finally, this racket is recommended for players who use an outer racket and want a little more gripping feeling, and players who use an inner racket and want a little more momentum.

  See original review Hide original review

  10ヶ月ほど使用しての感想です。
  このラケットを一言で表すなら、｢弾むのに収まる｣という相反する性能を持つラケットです。
  ラケットの数値を見てみると、インナーのラケットであるにも関わらず、板厚の関係でアウターの張継科ALCとそんなに弾みは変わりません。(オフチャロフの方が弾まない感じはあります)
  しかし、インナーであるため、回転は明らかにオフチャロフの方がかかり、台に収まる感覚があります。
  また、このラケットで個人的に好きな部分は、グリップです。
  好みは分かれますが、オフチャロフのグリップは幅が広く厚さも厚いため、他のラケットに比べるとかなり太いグリップになっています。
  がっしりグリップを握りたい人や、手の大きい人にはかなりオススメです。
  最後に、このラケットは、アウターラケットを使っていて、もう少し掴む感覚が欲しいという選手や、インナーラケットを使っていて、弾みがもう少し欲しいという選手にオススメです。

  2022/11/09

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	10
  Touch	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber（Front） Dignics 09C

  Recommend rubber（Back） Evolution MX-P

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  14

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. Next >