A person at a certain table tennis facility's profile

A person at a certain table tennis facility's profile
Gender Male
Age U20
Experience 6〜10 years

User review

  • Q5

    User review

    It has been decided that it will be discontinued, but I really like it, so I hope it will be revived someday.
    Q5 feels like the seat is sticky, and it's very easy to understand the feeling of grabbing the ball.
    Perhaps because the company involved in the production was a rubber professional, I think the rubber used in the seat was the best in terms of durability and strength, except for the smell.
    If I were to express this feeling simply, it would be "Tenergy 05 to fly on its own".
    Although it does not come out as fast as Tenergy, the amount of rotation is the same or higher, and the durability of Q5 is much longer.
    Considering the cost performance etc., it was the highest peak of Post-Tenergy.

    See original review

    2022/11/09
    Overall
    9/10
    Speed
    8
    Spin
    10
    Control
    9
    Hardness Little hard
    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • OVTCHAROV Innerforce ALC

    User review

    This is my review after using it for about 10 months.
    If you describe this racket in one word, it is a racket with the contradictory performance of "fitting to bounce".
    Looking at the racket numbers, despite being an inner racket, the momentum is not much different from the outer Zhang Jike ALC due to the plate thickness. (There is a feeling that Ovcharov does not bounce)
    However, since it is an inner, the rotation is obviously more Ovcharov, and there is a feeling that it fits on the table.
    Also, my personal favorite part about this racket is the grip.
    There are different tastes, but Ovcharov's grip is wide and thick, so it has a considerably thicker grip than other rackets.
    It is highly recommended for those who want a solid grip and those with large hands.
    Finally, this racket is recommended for players who use an outer racket and want a little more gripping feeling, and players who use an inner racket and want a little more momentum.

    See original review

    2022/11/09
    Overall
    9/10
    Speed
    8
    Spin
    9
    Control
    10
    Touch
    8
    Hardness Little hard

    Recommend rubber(Front) Dignics 09C

    Recommend rubber(Back) Evolution MX-P

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • ROZENA

    User review

    I think that the performance of this rubber is in the middle of everything.
    Sponge hardness is neither too hard nor too soft.
    Not too fast, not too slow.
    Rotation is easy to apply and takes a while.
    The controls are fairly easy as well.
    Because of this kind of performance, for example, if you put it on the inner force layer, you will be able to apply rotation firmly, and if you put it on Zhang Jike, you will be able to speed up. .

    See original review

    2022/11/23
    Overall
    7/10
    Speed
    6
    Spin
    7
    Control
    8
    Hardness Little soft

    Recomend racket OVTCHAROV Innerforce ALC

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • HYBRID K3

    User review

    Comparison with Lazanta C53

    The performance of the C53 is good when it is hit by a seat and thrown, while the performance of the K3 is good when it is hit firmly and thrown.

    K3 has better flight distance
    I feel that the speed is a little faster than C53
    The amount of rotation does not change
    K3 has a slightly stronger adhesive (not much different) and lasts longer

    The good thing about K3 is that it doesn't lose to the opponent's rotation
    Blocks stop well and can be easily countered

    The K3 is recommended for those who use tension and want a little more rotation, or who want a little more distance when using a chai rubber.

    See original review

    2022/11/14
    Overall
    9/10
    Speed
    8
    Spin
    9
    Control
    8
    Hardness Little hard

    Recomend racket OVTCHAROV Innerforce ALC

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • RASANTER C53

    User review

    It is a change from hybrid K3, and the comparison target is K3.

    rotation C53=K3
    Speed C53 > K3
    Sheet strength C53

    K3 and C53 are completely different in how to hit.
    With K3, if you rub it against the ball in the same way as with pure adhesive, you will get a good amount of rotation and a good flight distance.
    C53 has the impression that the flight distance drops a little when rubbed.
    It is an impression that goodness comes out if you can hook it firmly on the rubber and fly it by rotation.
    Therefore, I think that the amount of rotation of the serve and loop drive will be quite large.
    The C53 is recommended for those who hit the ball by hooking it firmly onto the sheet.

    See original review

    2022/11/09
    Overall
    8/10
    Speed
    7
    Spin
    9
    Control
    8
    Hardness Hard

    Recomend racket OVTCHAROV Innerforce ALC

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  1. < Previous
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Next >

Top Players

Country

Style

Welcome to the table tennis Navi!

Sign up!