A person at a certain table tennis facility's profile
Gender | Male |
---|---|
Age | U20 |
Experience | 6〜10 years |
User review
-
-
The sponge hardness is written as 52.5 degrees, but I don't feel that hardness.
It can be used by firmly biting it in, and it is highly recommended for people with a strong impact.Thanks to the firm rotation and the flight distance not being too long, it has excellent stability.
In addition, the seat is strong, so it is easy to return the rotation without losing to the opponent's rotation.There are no particularly difficult technologies, so I would be very happy if the amount of supply increased.
Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little hard
Recomend racket OVTCHAROV Innerforce ALC
-
-
I felt a little unsatisfactory to use it in the fore
Not recommended for people who can make a strong impactHowever, the back like me is a perfect rubber for players who want a sense of stability.
Dig 80 is softer than Dig 05 and 09c and bites in with less force, so it is easy to create a sense of stability in any technique.The only bad thing is that it loses to strong impact and the price
Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Recomend racket OVTCHAROV Innerforce ALC
-
-
This is my review after using it for about 10 months.
If you describe this racket in one word, it is a racket with the contradictory performance of "fitting to bounce".
Looking at the racket numbers, despite being an inner racket, the momentum is not much different from the outer Zhang Jike ALC due to the plate thickness. (There is a feeling that Ovcharov does not bounce)
However, since it is an inner, the rotation is obviously more Ovcharov, and there is a feeling that it fits on the table.
Also, my personal favorite part about this racket is the grip.
There are different tastes, but Ovcharov's grip is wide and thick, so it has a considerably thicker grip than other rackets.
It is highly recommended for those who want a solid grip and those with large hands.
Finally, this racket is recommended for players who use an outer racket and want a little more gripping feeling, and players who use an inner racket and want a little more momentum.Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness Little hard
Recommend rubber(Front) Dignics 09C
Recommend rubber(Back) Evolution MX-P
-
-
Comparison with Lazanta C53
The performance of the C53 is good when it is hit by a seat and thrown, while the performance of the K3 is good when it is hit firmly and thrown.
K3 has better flight distance
I feel that the speed is a little faster than C53
The amount of rotation does not change
K3 has a slightly stronger adhesive (not much different) and lasts longerThe good thing about K3 is that it doesn't lose to the opponent's rotation
Blocks stop well and can be easily counteredThe K3 is recommended for those who use tension and want a little more rotation, or who want a little more distance when using a chai rubber.
Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little hard
Recomend racket OVTCHAROV Innerforce ALC
-
-
It is a change from hybrid K3, and the comparison target is K3.
rotation C53=K3
Speed C53 > K3
Sheet strength C53K3 and C53 are completely different in how to hit.
With K3, if you rub it against the ball in the same way as with pure adhesive, you will get a good amount of rotation and a good flight distance.
C53 has the impression that the flight distance drops a little when rubbed.
It is an impression that goodness comes out if you can hook it firmly on the rubber and fly it by rotation.
Therefore, I think that the amount of rotation of the serve and loop drive will be quite large.
The C53 is recommended for those who hit the ball by hooking it firmly onto the sheet.Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Hard
Recomend racket OVTCHAROV Innerforce ALC
Racket
Producer
Grip
Review Ranking
Rubber
Producer
Type
-
Get the Amazon gift card at a Review!
20 points are added in the post. You can replace it by Amazon Gift Card worth $5.00 with 1000 points.