NO.1 table tennis review site

Reviews by user

• 

  Marco Marco （Experience：６〜１０ years） Performance over price! Especially recommended for the back side. Verified Purchase

  

  I used both fore and back, but it is especially recommended for the back side.
  The reason is that it is not so hard, so it is easy to bite into the back, and like me, the back technique is not so easy to handle and I can put out a reasonably good ball, and I have reduced mistakes.
  As for the fore, various rubbers are candidates because it can give power, but I felt that it was one of the few candidates when I wanted to put out a reasonably good ball in the back.
  In other words, I think it has valuable performance that is irreplaceable on the back side.
  I myself couldn't decide the rubber on the back side, so I tried various things and finally decided on this Dignix 09c.
  The classification is "adhesive tension", but it is closer to tension than adhesive.
  Compared to Tenergy, it is a little harder to automatically rotate than Tenergy, but the maximum amount of rotation is higher in Dignix 09c. (There was no sense of auto and I felt it was different from Tenergy)
  In other words, I was able to invite the opponent's mistakes with the rotation width such as knuckle and breakage, and I was able to actually win the game significantly.
  To be honest, I am convinced that it is thanks to Dignix 09c rather than my own ability.
  It's expensive, but it definitely has more performance than the price, and I think it's definitely worth a try.

  See original review Hide original review

  フォア・バック共に使用しましたが、特にバック面におすすめです。
  理由は、そこまで硬くないのでバックでも食い込ませやすいのと、私のようにバックの技術がいまいちでも扱いやすくそこそこ良い球を出せますし、ミスも減りました。
  フォアはパワーを出せる分、色々なラバーが候補になりますが、バックでそこそこ良い球を出したい時の数少ない候補の一つと感じました。
  言い方を変えると、バック面で代えが無い貴重な性能を有していると思います。
  私自身、バック面のラバーが決まらず色々試して最終的にこのディグニクス09cに決めました。
  分類は「粘着テンション」ですが、粘着よりはテンション寄りです。
  テナジーと比較すると、テナジーよりは自動で回転は若干かかりづらいですが、回転の最大量はディグニクス09cの方が上です。（オート感が無くテナジーとは別物と感じました）
  つまりナックル気味とぶち切れといった回転幅で相手のミスを誘う事ができ、実際に試合で格上に勝つ事ができました。
  正直、自分の実力というよりはディグニクス09cのお陰と確信しています。
  値段は張りますが、間違いなく値段以上の性能を有しており一度試してみる価値は確実にあると思います。

  2022/06/22

  All	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	10
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  39

• 

  Timobor! （Experience：More than ２０ years） Impressed rubber

  

  The first impression fits on the table as it flies. I think that this is different from conventional tenergy and dignics because dignics 09c is a sticky rubber. The counter-rotating punch is easily lifted. The stop is bitter stop, buchigire. What surprised me was the tremendous amount of rotation in Chiquita.

  See original review Hide original review

  色々あって使ってます。
  回転とスピードのバランスが高次元で実現されています。
  スピードドライブはスピードが出るにもかかわらず、回転がとてもかかっいるので、10/10点です。
  ループドライブはボールをシートがしっかりつかむので今までにないほどの回転量とこれだけの回転量にもかかわらず
  コントロールがしやすかったので、10/10点です。
  ミート打ちはしっかりインパクトすればとても良いボールが出るので、10/10点です。
  ツッツキはシートの引っ掛かりがとても良いので10/10点です。
  ストップはバタフライさん　のホームページに書いてあるようにネットギリギリに打てるので10/10点です。
  スピード系チキータは回転もかかる上にスピードが出るので10/10点です。
  スピン系チキータはシートの引っ掛かりがいいので10/10点です。
  サーブはシートがよく引っかかって回転がとてもかかるので、10/10点です。
  下回転打ちは上回転を打つように打てるので、10/10点です。
  引き合いはとても良いです。スポンジに食い込ませても回転がしっかりかかるので10/10点です。
  辛口で評価するつもりでしたが、合計が100点になりました。

  2020/02/01

  All	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	10
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use Timo Boll ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  158

• 

  Mr. Nekotaku Not bad

  

  Switched from Kyohyo to Fan Zhendong's forehand

  There is also the issue of how to shoot, but Kyohyo is better in terms of speed and rotation

  The power of one shot is also better with Kyohyo, and of course Kyohyo is easier to handle on the table

  The advantages are that it is lighter than Kyohyo, and the consecutive shots are almost always in even if you hit them randomly, so you can feel safe in fast-paced rallies, and also the long life

  It's a little disappointing for people who swing it hard on their own, but it may be recommended for people who want to take it easy or for people who find it difficult because their tension jumps out too much.

  See original review Hide original review

  樊振東のフォア面にキョウヒョウから移行
  撃ち方の問題もあるがスピード、回転共にキョウヒョウの方が良い
  1発の威力もキョウヒョウが上で台上処理も当然キョウヒョウがやりやすい
  勝ってる点はキョウヒョウと比べて重量が軽い事と連ドラは適当に打っても大体入る為早いピッチでのラリーでは安心出来ること、後は寿命の長さ
  自力でガンガン振る人にはちょっと物足りないけど少し楽したい人やテンション飛びすぎでキツイ人とかにはオススメ出来るかも

  2025/04/21

  All	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Racket recommended use Fan Zhendong ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  Naruhyo~ （Experience：６〜１０ years） I was estranged from it, but it's a good rubber.

  

  I used to put it on Harimoto alc, but the ball's power visibly decreased, so I stopped using it. However, when I put it on Harimoto Super alc, which seems to be a bit similar to Viscaria, it was really good. Maybe it doesn't go well with inner gloves, but only with outer gloves? For your reference,

  See original review Hide original review

  昔張本alcに貼ったら目に見えて球威が落ちてから疎遠になってました。ただビスカリアにちょっと似てるっぽい張本スーパーalcに貼ったらめちゃくちゃ良かったです。もしかしたらインナー系には合わず、アウター系にしか合わないのかも？ご参考までに

  2025/04/11

  All	10/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	10
  Control	9
  Hardness	Hard

  Racket recommended use Tomokazu Harimoto Innerforce SUPER ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  Taiko Ordinary Person （Experience：２〜３ years） Is it a little different than expected?

  

  I changed from Tenergy 05 Hard.
  Before using it, I thought it would be too hard and wouldn't fly very far,
  but when I used it, it was quite soft and I wondered if it was really just a little sticky.
  Personally, I felt that the back was easier to use.
  This is probably a matter of personal preference, so if you're interested, give it a try.

  See original review Hide original review

  テナジー05ハードから変えてみました。
  使う前は硬くて余り飛ばないのかな？と
  思っていましたが使ってみると結構柔らかくて本当に微粘着なのかなってくらいの感じです。
  個人的にはバックの方が使いやすいと感じました。　これは個人差だと思うので気になった人は使ってみて下さい

  2025/03/28

  All	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Hardness	Soft

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

• 

  Elle （Experience：２〜３ years） Fore Thick

  

  I use the thick one for my forehand.
  Compared to the 05 extra thick, it fits even if you swing it up or forward.
  I think it's good for those who want to use digs and want to focus on control but also want to hit a slightly heavier ball.

  See original review Hide original review

  フォアで厚を使用しています
  05特厚と比べ上に振っても収まるし前に振っても収まります
  ディグが使いたくてコントロール重視だけど少し重い球を出したいという方はいいと思います

  2024/11/22

  All	10/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	10
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use REINFORCE SI

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  3

• 

  Ichinico （Experience：６〜１０ years） It's hard, but it goes up and spins well. However, it's tough if you don't have impact.

  

  I changed from Lazanta c48. I felt the sponge was hard on my forehand, but thanks to the seat, I felt like the ball was going up. I was able to hit a very good loop even when I hit the drive thinly. However, I felt that I couldn't hit a thick drive without using the impact and my body. It was also difficult to hit the ball because it was hard. It may also be difficult to block if you don't have a good sense of it. However, in counters and inquiries, I was able to return the drives of the people who were competing in the main tournament of Chubu Japan. The backhand was not impactful enough, so I was able to hit a loop, but when it got thick, it was mostly a straight ball. The seat gave me a sense of stability, but to generate power, you need a solid swing speed because it is hard. It was stable on the table, but it is affected by the rotation, so it's not good to just hit it. The serve is also very good for short serves, but just like the strong drive, long serves are also poor without impact. It is generally easy to hit the ball thinly, but if you want to hit it hard and produce the unique sticky ball quality, this is an advanced rubber that requires solid physical strength and a minimum level of technique.

  See original review Hide original review

  ラザンターc48から変更です。フォアうちではスポンジの硬さは感じましたが、シートの　
  お陰で上がってくれる感じがしました。ドライブは全般で薄くかけてもとてもいいループが打てました。しかし、厚く捉えるドライブはインパクトと体が使えないと出せないと感じました。またミート打ちは硬い分むずかしかったです。　またブロックもしっかり感覚がないと抑えにくいかもしれません。しかし、カウンターや引き合いでは中部日本の本戦に出てる人たちのドライブにも打ち負けず返すことができました。　バックはインパクトが足りずループはかかりましたが、厚くなると棒球がほとんどでした。安定感はシートのお陰でありましたが、威力を出すには硬い分しっかりとしたスイングスピードが必要です。
  台上は安定感がありましたが、回転の影響を受けるので当てるだけはよくないです。サーブも短いサーブはとても良いですが、ドライブの強打と同じようにインパクトがないとロングサーブもしょぼくなりました。　全体的に薄く捉えるのはやりやすいですが、強打をうち、粘着独特の球質を出したいならしっかりとしたフィジカルと最低限の技術が必要な上級ラバーです。

  2024/11/20

  All	10/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	10
  Control	8
  Hardness	Hard

  Racket recommended use OVTCHAROV Innerforce ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

1. 1
2. 2
3. 3
4. 4
5. 5
6. Next >
7. Last »

Related rubber

• 
  TENERGY 05 HARD
• 
  ZYRE-03
• 
  DIGNICS 05
• 
  Tenergy 80-FX