NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  SYMMETRY HARD VERSION

  

  I use it on the pen table. I usually use Rakza PO. I also played with the original Symmetry. This is said to be the hard version, but it felt a little softer.
  As everyone has written, it has excellent ball control despite being vertical, and you can put a lot of spin on it. The ball jumps and follows a trajectory that makes it clear to me that it's spinning.
  However, although it holds the ball well, perhaps because it holds it too much, it doesn't fly that far, and it's a rubber that doesn't lift up very easily, so it's difficult to make cut shots and it becomes quite tiring to hit...

  See original review Hide original review

  ペン表で使用。普段はラクザPOを使用しています。シンメトリーは無印も打ちました。こちらはハードバージョンということですが、柔らかめに感じました。
  皆さんも書いているように縦目ながら球持ちは抜群ですし、回転もしっかりかけられます。自分で打ってて回転がかかってるのがわかるような跳び方、軌道を描きます。
  しかし、球持ちはいいのですが、持ちすぎるからなのかそこまで飛びはせず、しかもあまり勝手には持ち上がらないラバーで、カット打ちなど楽できず打っててなかなかしんどくなってきます…

  2025/10/24

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	8
  Control	7
  Hardness	Soft

  Recomend racket Garaydia Revolver-R

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  logue pro

  

  This is a pen front with a reverse side. Until now, I've mainly used the Galaidia R. (For a while, I also used the ACROSS, which, like the Rogue Pro, was also developed by Yu.)

  This racket has plenty of bounce, but it also holds the ball well, and it doesn't just bounce but also spins. The trajectory is easy to get up, and it's very stable. Its excellent ball control makes it easy to keep the ball stable on the table.

  It's light (mys is 80g). The Galaidia was 60g, so it does feel heavy, but compared to the Galaidia, the Rogue Pro is easier to send the ball flying, and perhaps because of its greater input efficiency, it doesn't feel as heavy.

  Personally, when applying a reverse side, I think a thickness of around 6.5mm is the limit for ease of angle control and grip, and this racket fits that bill perfectly.

  Also, although the ACROSS is an outer layer, it flexes quite a bit, perhaps because of its thinness, and it felt like it gripped the ball. However, the Rogue Pro is thicker, so it doesn't flex excessively, and I felt that it was good for popping the ball out.
  Also, the cork grip is very smooth and easy to hold.
  The price is a little high, but I think it's worth it for the high performance and ease of use of the racket.

  See original review Hide original review

  裏面ありペン表です。これまでメインではガレイディアRを使用してました。（一時期、ローグプロと同じくゆうさんが開発に携わったACROSSも使用）
  このラケットは十分な弾みもありますが、球持ちもあり、ただ弾むだけでなく回転もかかります。軌道も上に上がりやすく安定感も十分です。台上も球持ちの良さで収まります。
  重量は軽めです（うちのは80g）。ガレイディアが60gだったので、さすがに重さを感じますが、ガレイディアに比べてローグプロはボールを飛ばしやすく、入力に対する効率の良さを感じるからかそこまで重量は感じません。
  個人的に、裏面を貼る場合は角度の出しやすさや握りやすさから厚みは6.5mmくらいあたりが限界と思っていますがこのラケットはちょうどその部分も満たしています。
  あとACROSSはアウターですが薄さのせいか結構しなって球を掴む感じでしたが、ローグプロは厚みがあるからか過度にはしならずボールを弾き出せる良さも感じました。
  また、グリップのコルクがとても滑らかで握りやすく感じました。
  値段は少し高いですが、それに見合うくらい高性能でかつ使いやすいラケットだと思います。

  2025/11/02

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber（Back） Tenergy 64 FX

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

• Rapid

  

  I used this racket when it was called the TSP Kaisoku. The rubber is VO103. As the VICTAS website describes it as a pen-faced racket, I think it's well-suited to topspin rackets. It's a fast racket with good bounce, but I also found it relatively easy to apply spin. (The product page describes it as having a slightly hard feel, but I personally didn't find it that hard.) It takes advantage of the characteristics of topspin rackets while also maintaining a certain degree of control, making it an all-around racket that's not just for attacking. Some people may find the blade a little thick, but thanks to this, I think the face doesn't wobble. However, perhaps due to the blade shape and thickness, it was a little difficult to get the face out, making it difficult to use on the table.

  Although I've described it as an all-around racket, it does have quite a bit of bounce, so a high-elasticity or rubber with a slightly lower bounce might be easier to use.

  Overall, I think it's a very good racket, so I recommend that topspin racket users give it a try.

  See original review Hide original review

  TSP快速という名前だったときに使用しました。ラバーはVO103です。VICTASのサイトにペン表向きと紹介されているだけあって、表ソフトに合うと思います。スピードも出て、弾きも良いラケットですが、比較的回転もかけやすい印象です。（商品紹介ページではハード気味の打球感となっていますが、個人的にはそこまで硬いとは思いませんでした。）表ソフトの特徴を生かしつつ、コントロール性能もある程度確保しているので、攻撃一辺倒ではないオールラウンドラケットと思います。板厚が少々厚いので気になる人はいるかもしれませんが、そのおかげで面はブレにくいと思います。が、ブレード形状+板厚のせいか、少々面が出づらく台上がやりにくかったです。
  オールラウンドラケットとは書きましたが弾みは結構ありますので、高弾性か、少し弾みが抑えめのラバーのほうがより扱いやすいかもしれません。
  総合的に見ればとても良いラケットだったと思いますので、表ソフトユーザーの方は一度お試しください。

  2025/10/30

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	8
  Control	7
  Touch	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

• 

  BOOSTER JP

  

  I used the Booster SA for a long time. When I heard that the SA was being discontinued and its successor, the JP, was released, I tried it out when it was released.
  The feel is soft, and while the speed and spin aren't particularly noteworthy, I think they're still of a high standard (I didn't get many knuckle shots with my swing). It's also light, making it easy to handle. Meanwhile, the way the ball launches is quite unique compared to traditional topspin clubs. It's like a spin-type tension, which might help you visualize it. While it's certainly not an actual spin-type tension, the ball launches at a fairly high angle, sometimes rising higher than expected. With the shift to plastic balls, topspin clubs sometimes dropped more, so I think this is a response to that, but I honestly think it's difficult to use until you get used to the trajectory. However, thanks to its upward trajectory, I think it's well-suited for players who attack with an earlier impact point or for players transitioning from inverted clubs.

  See original review Hide original review

  昔永らくブースターSAを使っていました。SAの廃盤と後継のJPが出ることを知り、発売したタイミングで使ってみました。
  打球感は柔らかく、スピードもスピンも特筆すべきというところまでは行きませんが、高水準かと思います（ナックルは私の打ち方ではあまり出ませんでした）。重量も軽めなので取り回しもしやすいです。一方、ボールの飛び出し方が従来の表ソフトと比べてかなり独特です。スピン系テンションのよう、というとイメージがつきやすいでしょうか。勿論実際のスピン系テンションとは違いますが、ボールがかなり斜め上方向に飛び出すので、思ったよりボールが上がってしまう、ということがありました。プラボールになって表ソフトもよりボールが落ちてしまうことがあったので、それに対応してるのだろうとは考えられますが、軌道になれるまでは正直使いづらいのではないかと思います。しかしこの上に上がる軌道のおかげで、より打点の早いところで攻めていく選手や、裏ソフトからの移行には適してるのではないかと思います。

  2025/10/23

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	7
  Control	6
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Garaydia Revolver-R

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

• 

  TORNADE SUPREME SOFT

  

  I use it with a pen topspin. I've also played with the original Tornado Supreme. Compared to the original, the soft version is lighter and feels less quirky. Not only is the sponge softer, but the sheet is also different from the original, which I think is a factor. The change in sheet and sponge makes it a little more like a standard tension rubber.
  As for the essential specs, I think the spin performance is very high. Serves, pushes, and drives all have good spin. It's not difficult to hit with a hit-type club, and it has good bounce. It has plenty of speed, so I think it's suitable for players who like to take the initiative in hitting. While you won't get the knuckle-like ball you'd expect from a topspin rubber with normal hitting, depending on your technique (such as blocking a drive from above), you can get it.
  The original version was hard and heavy, with a strong Chinese topspin feel that made it a little difficult to use, but the soft version has all the improvements, so I think it's a rubber that can be used by a wide range of players.
  The only drawbacks are the price and the fear of it being discontinued...

  See original review Hide original review

  ペン表で使用。トルネードスプリームは無印も打ったことがあります。無印と比較するとソフトは軽量で、打った感触もクセが少ない印象があります。スポンジが柔らかくなっただけでなくシートも無印と違うので、その影響によるものと思います。シートとスポンジが変わったことで若干一般的なテンション系寄りとなったと言えます。
  肝心のスペックですが、回転性能は非常に高いと思います。サーブ、ツッツキ、ドライブとどれもしっかり回転をかけることができます。ミート系がやりづらいかというとそういうこともなく、弾きの良さも持ち合わせています。スピードも十分ありますので、自分から打っていくようなタイプに適していると思います。表ソフトらしいナックル性のボールは普通に打っていると出ませんが、打ち方によっては（ドライブに対して上からブロックするなど）も出ます。
  無印は硬めで重く、中国表らしさが強く少々使いづらさがあったと思いますが、ソフト版についてはその使いにくさが軽減されているので幅広い人に使えるラバーだと思います。
  ネックは値段と、廃盤してしまうことの怖さですね…

  2025/10/22

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Garaydia Revolver-R

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

1. 1
2. 2
3. Next >