NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  GLAYZER09C

  

  It's a rubber that's positioned as a cheaper version of Dignics 09c, but I think it's a rubber that a wide range of people will find easy to use. I mainly used it on the back side.

  It's a hard rubber, but it doesn't feel as hard as I thought it would.
  It holds the ball quite well, so it's easy to do tabletop and return techniques. I get the impression that it's more for people who are just starting to learn these techniques or who value stability, rather than for people who are already good at them.

  While it can handle all the techniques well, the speed and rotation are not that overwhelming. If you're not satisfied with the speed, try it with a special material racket made by Chosha.

  It's light and reasonably priced, so I'd like beginners and intermediate players to try it. You may feel that the balls you hit in practice are not enough, but I think it's a rubber for people who want to hit consistently in matches and are particular about winning.

  See original review Hide original review

  廉価版ディグニクス09cといった立ち位置のラバーですが、かなり幅広い層が使いやすいと感じるラバーだと思います。主にバック面で使用しました。

  
  硬めのラバーですが、思ったよりも硬く感じません。
  かなりボールを持つため、台上技術やかけ返す技術がやりやすいです。これらの技術が既に得意な人が使うというよりは、これから習得する人や安定重視の人向けという印象を受けます。

  
  どの技術もそつなくこなせる一方、速度や回転はそこまで圧倒的ではありません。速度が物足りない方は蝶社製の特殊素材ラケットと合わせて下さい。

  
  重量も軽く値段もお手頃なので、初級者や中級者の方にぜひ試してもらいたいです。練習で打つボールは物足りなく感じるでしょうが、試合で安定して入れたい、勝ちにこだわる人向けのラバーだと思います。

  2025/02/07

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	8
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket ALTIUS ST5

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  ILIUS S

  

  Unusually for a cut, both the sponge and the grains are hard. If the top plate of the racket is hard, it may be a little difficult to use.

  The surface is non-slip. Therefore, it is easier to adjust the cut and not cut yourself than with other grains. I especially like the fact that the push does not slip. Therefore, I think it takes skill to make a solid cut.

  The cut has a low trajectory and a modest flight. If you want to make a relaxed, deep cut, you need to rub the bottom a little.

  Perhaps because it is hard, it is relatively easy to attack (in the case of a thin sponge).

  In general, it is a rubber that shows the skill of the user, so I think it is more suitable for cut players who have a certain degree of experience rather than beginners. It is a high grain with a manual feel, so if you get into it, you will get into it all the time.

  See original review Hide original review

  カット用としては珍しく、スポンジも粒も硬いです。ラケットの上板が硬めだと、少し使いにくくなるかもしれません。

  
  特徴としては表面が滑りません。そのため他の粒よりも自分で切る切らないの調整がやりやすいです。特にツッツキが滑らないのが好印象。その分がっつりカットを切るには技術が必要だと思います。

  
  カットは弾道低めかつ飛びが控えめです。ゆったりした深いカットにしたい場合は、少し底をこすってあげる必要があります。

  硬いからなのか攻撃も比較的しやすいです（スポンジ薄の場合）。

  
  総じて使用者の腕が出るラバーなので、初心者というよりはある程度習熟したカットマン向けだと思います。マニュアル感がある粒高なので、ハマる人はとことんハマるとかと。

  2025/02/07

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	3
  Spin	7
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket WANOKIWAMI MIDORI DEF

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  WANOKIWAMI MIDORI DEF

  

  I was looking for a racket similar to the discontinued Panasonic Pro Model, and I'm very satisfied with the feel of the shot.

  It bends just right, so it's easy to stop strong hits, and it bounces just right when attacking. It holds the ball a little, so I got the impression that drive attacks are more stable than smashes.

  It seems that a slightly harder rubber would be more balanced. I also tried using the Sho Team Kyobyou, but it was too soft and sometimes flew a little bouncy, so I settled on Turbo Blue. The Ilius S, which has a harder grain, had just the right feel when hitting the ball.

  If I had to point out a drawback, it would be the larger blade size than usual. It's not so bad when attacking with a forehand, but it's hard to swing through when attacking with a backhand, and I felt that the Panasonic Pro Model is better in this respect.

  Overall, I think it's a very good racket.

  See original review Hide original review

  廃盤になった松下プロモデルに近いラケットを探していたのですが、打球感が非常に近く満足しています。

  ほどよくしなってくれるので強打を止めやすく、攻撃でも過不足なく弾んでくれます。少し球を持つので、スマッシュというよりはドライブ系の攻撃の方が安定する印象を受けました。

  ラバーの組み合わせとしては少し硬めの方がバランスが取れるように思われます。省チーム狂飆も使ってみましたが、柔らかすぎて少しぼよーんと飛ぶことがあったため、ターボブルーに落ち着きました。粒も硬めなイリウスsがちょうど良い打球感でした。

  難点を挙げるなら通常より大きなブレードサイズでしょうか。フォアはまだしもバックで攻撃する際に振り抜きにくく、ここは松下プロモデルの方が優れていると感じました。

  総じて非常に優れたラケットだと思います。

  2024/12/20

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	8
  Control	10
  Touch	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber（Front） HURRICANE PRO Ⅲ TURBO BLUE

  Recommend rubber（Back） ILIUS S

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  7P-2A.Ri

  

  Please note that this is for cutting.

  The beauty of the finish is captivating. Darker's rackets are carefully made.

  The feel of the ball is very good, with a pleasant feel and sound that is unique to cypress. I imagine that a softer rubber would give an even better feel.

  Although it is made of seven plywood, it does not feel very hard and is easy to spin. At the same time, it has enough speed when smashing, so it is easy to use regardless of the hitting style.

  When cutting, the ball is cut slowly with a relatively low trajectory. The amount of spin is inferior to that of a thinner racket, but I think the stability is quite high for a standard blade racket.

  There are not many similar rackets, so it is difficult to compare, but this racket has reduced the amount of spin of the Masamune, increased the stability of the cut, and made it easier to hit smashes. In addition, the ease of cutting with the grain height is superior to the Masamune.

  I think this racket is generally for cut players who fight with compact swing cuts and attacks. The unique feel of the ball is sure to become addictive. Please consider purchasing one.

  See original review Hide original review

  　カット用での使用になります、ご注意ください。

  
  　仕上げの美しさに目を奪われます。ダーカーさんのラケットはやはり作りが丁寧ですね。

  　打球感は非常によく、檜特有の心地よい打球感と音が響きます。おそらくもっと柔らかいラバーであれば、さらに良い打感が得られると推測します。

  　7枚合板ではありますが硬さは余り感じず、回転もかけやすいです。それでいてスマッシュ時には十分なスピードが出るため、打法を問わず使いやすいです。

  　カット時にはうって変わって、比較的低い弾道でゆっくりとしたカットが飛びます。回転量は板薄のラケットには劣りますが、安定感は標準ブレードのラケットとしてはかなり高めだと思います。

  　似たようなラケットがあまりないため比較が難しいですが、正宗の回転量を減らしてカットの安定感を上げ、スマッシュをより打ちやすくしたようなラケットです。また、粒高の切りやすさは正宗よりも優れています。

  　総じてコンパクトなスイングのカットと攻撃で戦うカットマン向けのラケットだと思います。独特の打感は癖になること間違いありません。ぜひご検討ください。

  2025/04/30

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	8
  Control	9
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber（Front） TRIPLE Double Extra

  Recommend rubber（Back） DO Knuckle (Short pimples)

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  HURRICANE PRO Ⅲ TURBO BLUE

  

  It's ridiculously hard and heavy. However, if you use a lightweight outer layer, it will turn into a baseball ball, and it will be difficult to produce the strong quirk ball and sinking drive.

  I think its strengths are the strength of the third serve, the general table top, and the amount of change in the small dragon. In other words, it is not suitable for other techniques, such as consecutive forehand shots in the front court or pull back.

  I think it is a very sharp rubber for people who are stable-minded and have the guts to drop the impact point a little in the front to middle court and keep applying small dragons. If you are going to use it, I think it will develop a flavor if you use it patiently for about half a year. It has the longest lifespan.

  See original review Hide original review

  馬鹿みたいに硬くて重いです。かといって軽量のアウターに張ると、棒球になってしまったり強みの癖玉や沈むドライブが出しにくくなります。

  
  強みはサーブ3球目の強さと台上全般、そしてちょりドラの変化量だと思います。逆に言うとそれ以外の技術、前陣でのフォア連打や下がっての引き合い等には向いていないです。

  
  前〜中陣で少し打点を落としてちょりドラをかけ続ける、安定志向かつ根性のある人向けの、尖りに尖ったラバーだと思います。使うのであれば半年ほどかけて根気よく使ってみると、味が出てくると思います。寿命は最長クラスですので。

  2025/02/07

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Hardness	Hard

  Recomend racket ALTIUS ST5

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

1. 1
2. 2
3. Next >