NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  WANOKIWAMI MIDORI DEF

  

  I was looking for a racket similar to the discontinued Panasonic Pro Model, and I'm very satisfied with the feel of the shot.

  It bends just right, so it's easy to stop strong hits, and it bounces just right when attacking. It holds the ball a little, so I got the impression that drive attacks are more stable than smashes.

  It seems that a slightly harder rubber would be more balanced. I also tried using the Sho Team Kyobyou, but it was too soft and sometimes flew a little bouncy, so I settled on Turbo Blue. The Ilius S, which has a harder grain, had just the right feel when hitting the ball.

  If I had to point out a drawback, it would be the larger blade size than usual. It's not so bad when attacking with a forehand, but it's hard to swing through when attacking with a backhand, and I felt that the Panasonic Pro Model is better in this respect.

  Overall, I think it's a very good racket.

  See original review Hide original review

  廃盤になった松下プロモデルに近いラケットを探していたのですが、打球感が非常に近く満足しています。

  ほどよくしなってくれるので強打を止めやすく、攻撃でも過不足なく弾んでくれます。少し球を持つので、スマッシュというよりはドライブ系の攻撃の方が安定する印象を受けました。

  ラバーの組み合わせとしては少し硬めの方がバランスが取れるように思われます。省チーム狂飆も使ってみましたが、柔らかすぎて少しぼよーんと飛ぶことがあったため、ターボブルーに落ち着きました。粒も硬めなイリウスsがちょうど良い打球感でした。

  難点を挙げるなら通常より大きなブレードサイズでしょうか。フォアはまだしもバックで攻撃する際に振り抜きにくく、ここは松下プロモデルの方が優れていると感じました。

  総じて非常に優れたラケットだと思います。

  2024/12/20

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	8
  Control	10
  Touch	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber（Front） HURRICANE PRO Ⅲ TURBO BLUE

  Recommend rubber（Back） ILIUS S

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  HURRICANE PRO Ⅲ TURBO BLUE

  

  It's ridiculously hard and heavy. However, if you use a lightweight outer layer, it will turn into a baseball ball, and it will be difficult to produce the strong quirk ball and sinking drive.

  I think its strengths are the strength of the third serve, the general table top, and the amount of change in the small dragon. In other words, it is not suitable for other techniques, such as consecutive forehand shots in the front court or pull back.

  I think it is a very sharp rubber for people who are stable-minded and have the guts to drop the impact point a little in the front to middle court and keep applying small dragons. If you are going to use it, I think it will develop a flavor if you use it patiently for about half a year. It has the longest lifespan.

  See original review Hide original review

  馬鹿みたいに硬くて重いです。かといって軽量のアウターに張ると、棒球になってしまったり強みの癖玉や沈むドライブが出しにくくなります。

  
  強みはサーブ3球目の強さと台上全般、そしてちょりドラの変化量だと思います。逆に言うとそれ以外の技術、前陣でのフォア連打や下がっての引き合い等には向いていないです。

  
  前〜中陣で少し打点を落としてちょりドラをかけ続ける、安定志向かつ根性のある人向けの、尖りに尖ったラバーだと思います。使うのであれば半年ほどかけて根気よく使ってみると、味が出てくると思います。寿命は最長クラスですので。

  2025/02/07

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Hardness	Hard

  Recomend racket ALTIUS ST5

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  ILIUS S

  

  Unusually for a cut, both the sponge and the grains are hard. If the top plate of the racket is hard, it may be a little difficult to use.

  The surface is non-slip. Therefore, it is easier to adjust the cut and not cut yourself than with other grains. I especially like the fact that the push does not slip. Therefore, I think it takes skill to make a solid cut.

  The cut has a low trajectory and a modest flight. If you want to make a relaxed, deep cut, you need to rub the bottom a little.

  Perhaps because it is hard, it is relatively easy to attack (in the case of a thin sponge).

  In general, it is a rubber that shows the skill of the user, so I think it is more suitable for cut players who have a certain degree of experience rather than beginners. It is a high grain with a manual feel, so if you get into it, you will get into it all the time.

  See original review Hide original review

  カット用としては珍しく、スポンジも粒も硬いです。ラケットの上板が硬めだと、少し使いにくくなるかもしれません。

  
  特徴としては表面が滑りません。そのため他の粒よりも自分で切る切らないの調整がやりやすいです。特にツッツキが滑らないのが好印象。その分がっつりカットを切るには技術が必要だと思います。

  
  カットは弾道低めかつ飛びが控えめです。ゆったりした深いカットにしたい場合は、少し底をこすってあげる必要があります。

  硬いからなのか攻撃も比較的しやすいです（スポンジ薄の場合）。

  
  総じて使用者の腕が出るラバーなので、初心者というよりはある程度習熟したカットマン向けだと思います。マニュアル感がある粒高なので、ハマる人はとことんハマるとかと。

  2025/02/07

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	3
  Spin	7
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket WANOKIWAMI MIDORI DEF

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  GLAYZER09C

  

  It's a rubber that's positioned as a cheaper version of Dignics 09c, but I think it's a rubber that a wide range of people will find easy to use. I mainly used it on the back side.

  It's a hard rubber, but it doesn't feel as hard as I thought it would.
  It holds the ball quite well, so it's easy to do tabletop and return techniques. I get the impression that it's more for people who are just starting to learn these techniques or who value stability, rather than for people who are already good at them.

  While it can handle all the techniques well, the speed and rotation are not that overwhelming. If you're not satisfied with the speed, try it with a special material racket made by Chosha.

  It's light and reasonably priced, so I'd like beginners and intermediate players to try it. You may feel that the balls you hit in practice are not enough, but I think it's a rubber for people who want to hit consistently in matches and are particular about winning.

  See original review Hide original review

  廉価版ディグニクス09cといった立ち位置のラバーですが、かなり幅広い層が使いやすいと感じるラバーだと思います。主にバック面で使用しました。

  
  硬めのラバーですが、思ったよりも硬く感じません。
  かなりボールを持つため、台上技術やかけ返す技術がやりやすいです。これらの技術が既に得意な人が使うというよりは、これから習得する人や安定重視の人向けという印象を受けます。

  
  どの技術もそつなくこなせる一方、速度や回転はそこまで圧倒的ではありません。速度が物足りない方は蝶社製の特殊素材ラケットと合わせて下さい。

  
  重量も軽く値段もお手頃なので、初級者や中級者の方にぜひ試してもらいたいです。練習で打つボールは物足りなく感じるでしょうが、試合で安定して入れたい、勝ちにこだわる人向けのラバーだと思います。

  2025/02/07

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	8
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket ALTIUS ST5

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  LIBERTA SOLID Pro

  

  I've been using it for about half a year. I think the appeal is the feel of the shot, which even 5-ply users will be satisfied with, and the high overall performance.

  It contains special materials, but it doesn't feel that hard. I even think it's easy to use the technique of hitting.

  The amount of rotation is sufficient and not much different from 5-ply. On top of that, the bounce is uniform, so you can achieve stable returns.

  There are no outstanding points that are particularly good, but in any case, there are few drawbacks, so I think that any type of intermediate class player can use it without feeling uncomfortable.

  Compared to Chosha's Inner Force ZLF (discontinued), it is a little heavier but is harder to push, and it seems to have better power for blocks and drives. I wonder if the ball speed and handling are better on that racket.

  I think it is a racket that can be recommended to a wide range of people, from those who have been playing for about a year to those who have recently returned, and can be used with any rubber.

  See original review Hide original review

  　半年ほど使用してみました。5枚合板ユーザーでも満足できる打球感と、総合的な性能の高さが魅力だと思っています。

  　特殊素材入りですがそこまで硬さは感じません。弾く技術がやりやすいなぁと思うくらいです。

  　回転量は十分であり、5枚合板と大差ありません。そのうえで弾みが均一なため、安定した返球を実現できます。

  　特筆するほどずば抜けて良い点はないのですが、兎に角欠点が少なく、中級者クラスであればどのようなタイプの人が使っても違和感なく使えると思います。

  　蝶社のインナーフォースZLF（廃盤）と比較すると、少し重い代わりに押されにくく、ブロックやドライブの威力に優れる印象です。あちらの方が球速や取り回しは上でしょうか。

  　始めて1年程度の方から最近復帰した方まで、幅広い層に勧められる、貼るラバーを選ばないラケットだと思います。

  2025/04/30

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	8
  Control	9
  Touch	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber（Front） Q QUALITY

  Recommend rubber（Back） Vega Japan

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

1. 1
2. 2
3. Next >