NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  akkadi K max (collar rubber)

  

  It feels like a Chinese sticky tension that has not yet bottomed out, and the sponge is quite hard (Chinese hardness 40 degrees, German hardness 50 degrees?), and the surface feels a little more sticky than slightly sticky.

  Due to personal special circumstances, I only use it on the back, but the speed drive and power drive do not have much power with the pure wood 5-ply board that I use, so the speed is about 6. However, the speed is good enough that you can hit meat shots and smash shots without touching them.

  It is easy to stabilize the underspin shot by taking advantage of the slightly sticky sheet and waiting for the ball a little, and you can put a lot of spin on the loop or make it a knuckle-like shot, which makes a difference in spin and ball quality.
  Also, thanks to the slightly sticky sheet, even if you hit it hard yourself, it tends to be short and can be hit in two bounces on the table, or you can drop the impact point and make it hit. Taking advantage of the lack of bounce in this area, it is easy to do normal blocks and cut blocks.

  It's hard to recommend this rubber to others because of the peculiar feel of the ball when hit, but since I started using this rubber, my win rate in singles league matches was less than 50%, but I suddenly started winning and beating teammates that I had never been able to beat before. It's a mysterious rubber.

  See original review Hide original review

  未打底の中国系粘着テンションといった感じでスポンジがかなり硬め（中国硬度40度、ドイツ硬度で50度クラス？）で表面は微粘着よりちょっと粘着強めな感じ。

  個人的な特殊な事情でバックのみですが、スピードドライブやパワードライブは自分が使用している純木製5枚合板だとあまり威力を出せず、それで見るとスピードは6といった所です。ただミート打ち、スマッシュ系はノータッチで打ち抜けるくらいしっかりスピードが出ます。

  下回転打ちは微粘着シートを活かして少しボールを待つイメージだと安定しやすく、ループで回転をしっかりかけたりナックル気味にも出来て回転や球質の差は出せます。
  また、微粘着のお陰でけっこう自分からガッツリツッツキしても短く収まりやすく台上に2バウンドで収まったり打点を落として打たせたりできます。この辺の弾まなさを活かして普通のブロックやカットブロックもやりやすいです。

  打球感のクセもあって周りにオススメはしにくいですけど、このラバーを貼ってからシングルスのリーグ戦でこれまで勝率5割以下だったのがいきなり優勝や、同じチームメイトで全然勝てなかった人に勝てるようになって、不思議なラバーです。

  2025/01/26

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Hardness	Hard

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  Vega Asia hybrid

  

  I think the main weapons are speed and power. It is very easy to hit flat like a table tennis racket, and it is easy to over-block the opponent.
  The slight adhesion makes the ball less likely to fall (sometimes it falls due to lack of impact), and the distance is slightly reduced, so even though the sponge hardness is 50 degrees, the distance is within the range of the table.
  Although it is easy to apply spin, it is not that it is very easy to apply, but if you occasionally do a loop or a drive with emphasis on spin when attacking with a flat hit, you can apply it enough to aim for an over-miss.
  When trying to serve and receive short serves with a sponge hardness of 50 degrees + slight adhesion, even if you try to apply a lot of spin and fly it, it doesn't fly so much that it goes into the net repeatedly. It seems to take some getting used to. It is easy to stop by taking advantage of the fact that it does not fly too much, but since it does not spin that much, be careful that it is easy to flick if it floats.
  It is still difficult unless you make a strong impact, but I think it is worth trying once for beginners and intermediate players who love flat hits and smashes.

  See original review Hide original review

  主戦武器はスピード、威力かと思います。表ソフトのようなフラット打ちがかなりやりやすく、相手ブロックをオーバーさせやすいです。
  微粘着によってボールが落ちにくくなっているのと（たまにインパクト不足なのか落ちることもある）、少し飛距離を抑えてくれているのか、スポンジ硬度50度だけど飛距離も台にしっかり収まる範囲。
  回転はかけやすいとは言えメチャクチャかかるという訳でもありませんが、フラット打ちで攻めてる所にたまにループや回転に比重を置いたドライブをするとオーバーミスも狙えるくらいはかけられます。
  サーブ、レシーブはスポンジ硬度50度+微粘着でショートサーブしようとすると、けっこう回転かけて飛ばそうとしても飛ばなすぎてネットイン連発しました。慣れが必要そう。ストップも飛ばなすぎるのを利用してやりやすいですが、回転がそこまでかからない分、浮いたらフリックされやすいのが要注意。
  インパクト強くしないとやはりキツイですけど、フラット打ち、スマッシュ大好きな初中級者は一度使ってみる価値ありだと思います。

  2025/05/15

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	7
  Control	10
  Hardness	Hard

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0