NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  Rakza 9

  

  I have the impression that it is not used much among the Rakza series.
  The drive arc is low, but if you loop it a little, it will clear the net, and even if it goes down, the back drive will extend well.
  The straight trajectory is also good for scoring, and in particular, the back smash, which is bounced with the wrist, will pierce the opponent's court.
  It has good control, so it is stable for blocking.
  I don't know how easy it is to use on the table because it is attached to the back of the pen holder, but conversely, I think it is quite good as a back-only rubber specialized for attack.

  See original review Hide original review

  ラクザシリーズの中でも使用者は少ないイメージですが。
  ドライブの弧線は低いですが、ループ気味にかければしっかりネットを越えますし、下がってもバックドライブはよく伸びます。
  直線的な軌道は得点力も高く、特に手首を利かせて弾くバックスマッシュは相手コートに突き刺さります。
  コントロールも良いのでブロックも安定します。
  ペンホルダーの裏面に貼っているので台上技術のやり易さはわかりませんが、逆にいうと攻撃に特化した裏面専用ラバーとしてはかなり良いのではないかと思います。

  2024/12/24

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	8
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket LIBERTA SYNERGY PLUS J-PEN

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

• 

  Fastarc G-1

  

  There are many other rubbers that have a high amount of spin and a high arc.
  The good thing about this rubber is that it can do anything.
  The arc of the drive is high, but the smash is direct.
  The momentum is high, but the stop stops.
  With Japanese-style pens, almost all techniques are done with one rubber, so this wide range is appreciated. I can see why so many people choose it.

  See original review Hide original review

  回転量があって弧線が高くて、というラバーは他にもたくさんありますが。
  このラバーの良さはやはり、「何でもできる」というところでしょうか。
  ドライブの弧線は高いのにスマッシュは直線的。
  弾みは高いのにストップは止まる。
  日本式ペンだとほぼ全ての技術を１枚のラバーですることになるので、この幅の広さはありがたい。多くの人に選ばれる理由がわかります。

  2024/12/24

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket LIBERTA SYNERGY PLUS J-PEN

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

• 

  LIBERTA SYNERGY PLUS J-PEN

  

  Even if you try to put rubber on both sides of a Japanese style racket, you will run into the following obstacles:

  - The center of gravity is too close to the tip

  - The board is too thick to be used on both sides

  - Many double-sided Japanese style rackets do not bounce

  - There are no options in the first place

  This racket has an oval shape, so the center of gravity is closer to the hand and it is 6mm thick, so you can swing it firmly even with rubber on both sides.
  The racket itself weighs 73g, and even with rubber on both sides it is only 159g, so it is easy to operate and improves the quality of light hits.
  Compared to the Chinese style, the wrist is more effective, so the head turns and the back drive runs well.
  Since it is a Japanese style rather than a reverse style, the thumb is stable in the back short, and the range of reception is also wider.
  The ball feels hard when hit, leaves the racket quickly, and the amount of rotation may be modest, but it stops firmly. The outer carbon gives it perfect bounce.
  Above all, Japanese style rackets are cool!
  Since I started playing the backhand style, my only option has been the Chinese style, but now I am returning to the Japanese style for the first time in 20 years.

  See original review Hide original review

  日本式で両面にラバーを貼ろうと思っても、
  ・重心が先端に寄りすぎる
  ・板が厚くて両面に向かない
  ・両面仕様の日本式は弾まないラケットが多い
  ・そもそも選択肢がない
  という壁にぶち当たるのですが。
  このラケットは形状が楕円形なのもあってか重心が手元寄りで、厚さも6mmなので、両面にラバーを貼ってもしっかり振りきれます。
  ラケット本体が73g、両面にラバーを貼っても159gという軽さなので、操作性が良く、軽打の質が向上します。
  中国式と比べて手首が利くのでヘッドがまわり、バックドライブもよく走ります。
  反転式ではなく日本式なので親指をバックショートが安定し、レシーブの幅も広がります。
  打球感が硬くて球離れが早く、回転量は控えめかもしれませんが、ストップはしっかり止まります。アウターカーボンで弾みも申し分ありません。
  何より日本式ラケットはかっこいい！
  裏面打法を始めてから今まで中国式しか選択肢がなかった私も、これで20年ぶりに日本式に復帰です。

  2024/12/24

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	7
  Control	9
  Touch	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber（Front） Fastarc G-1

  Recommend rubber（Back） Rakza 9

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0