NO.1 table tennis review site

I used the day pen for a long time, but I changed to the medium pen to shake the back side and practiced for about 3 years, but I couldn't get the angle of the back side, and the serve and the table didn't go well.
At that time, I was inspired by Daisei Matsushita and changed to this reversible racket, and I am very satisfied with it.
The first characteristic of this racket is that it is light, so it is difficult to swing late and it is easy to turn back. Then it bounces well for the reversal type. It is a momentum that even Driveman can go at all. The shot feeling is hard, but I didn't feel any difficulty in using it, probably because the sweet spot is wide.
From here are the advantages of the reversible pen compared to the middle pen. Although it is not a story specific to this racket, I would like you to think about it if you have changed from a day pen to a medium pen. First of all, it is easy to put out the angle of the back side. Unlike the middle pen, the grip can be sharpened well, so you can make a grip that can firmly sharpen the angle of the back side. In addition, the square (rounded corner?) blade has more power in the foreground due to centrifugal force. For myself, who was originally a day pen, I feel that the square type is easier to do on the table and serve.

See original review Hide original review

512 chars? For 1 byte it should be 1024! So in brief: For trying RPB. FH RD H3 2.0 40d, BH BK 39 999T-1 cust. ~34d sponge. Blade: 71g, total, reduced rubber size 145g. Spin, control, size > Senkoh5, speed, smash, sweet spot <. OK w/ 1 rubber (hard!), heavy & bad balance w/ 2 rubbers. Maybe OK for stronger wrist and arm, maybe more mid-distance. Nice, but now using a lighter, faster blade.