ICE CREAM AZX I

Everyone's rating [Hardness] Little hard
[Performance] Speed and Spin are excellent.
ICE CREAM AZX I

(Click to show big size)

Averages reviews points

  • Evaluation: 9.23 / 10
  • Number of review: 13
    • Speed:9.08
    • Spin:8.77
    • Control:8.69
    PERFECT BALANCE OF PERFORMANCE & POWER CREATED BY HYBRID COMPOSITE

    ZEPHYLIUM CARBON (ZLC) and ARYLATE CARBON (ALC), both with clear distinctive performance in one blade provides the players with variety of choices during game play. Depending on the game situation, the player can switch the spin, power and speed by switching front and back of the blade.

    • FL
    • ST
    • Chinese pen

    Specifications

    Price
    18,000 Yen(Include tax 19,800 Yen)
    Producer
    XIOM
    Product code
    21101、21103
    Weight
    88g
    Material
    Wood, ALC, ZL carbon, 7 ply wood
    Thickness
    5.7mm

    User reviews

    • Tomoyan

      (Experience:4〜5 years) First-class product in appearance and performance Verified Purchase

      Player reviews

      The z side is more stable and the ball goes. Side A is easy to play and the ball is released a little faster. The grip is quite thin, so you need to get used to it. The front rubber is pasted on the A side, but it is very compatible. It looks cool, so I recommend it to anyone who wants to do something different.

      See original review

      2020/10/16
      Overall
      9/10
      Speed
      10
      Spin
      9
      Control
      9
      Touch
      9
      Hardness Little soft

      Recommended rubber (Forehand) RASANTER R48

      Recommended rubber (Backhand) VO>102

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • mix

      Recommended for intermediate students! !

      Player reviews

      Currently I am using Jupiter 2 on both sides of the galaxy, but I also tried in tension systems such as Fastark G1 and Tenagi.

      a nice place
      I think our middle class is not good at either the fore or the back. In that respect, the special materials used on both sides are different, so they make up for the difficulty. I think that it is easy to use basically because it is compatible with any rubber. As it is an inner, it is possible to do fine technology (stop) etc without any problem, and it is easy to handle because it does not fly away because it flies moderately.

      bad place
      As the grip is as thin as Kenta Matsudaira, if you put extra thickness on both sides, the racket will be top heavy, so some people may feel heavy.

      Summary
      There was no major disadvantage.
      I think it is a really good racket.

      See original review

      2019/07/09
      Overall
      9/10
      Speed
      9
      Spin
      10
      Control
      9
      Touch
      9
      Hardness little hard
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • Kinky

      Good back stickiness

      Player reviews

      Racket weight: 85g (The average was 87g when I measured some)
      Fore: Side A, Tenergy 05 Extra Thick
      Back: Z side DNA Dragon Grip MAX
      Gross weight: 183g

      The A side feels like outer carbon, and the Z side feels like inner carbon.
      Even though it's an inner, it's surprisingly stiff and cool. However, the Z side has a proper ball holding, which is compatible with adhesive rubber.

      Until now, it was Tenergy 05 with inner carbon, but I want more power ... But I also want softness because it is back adhesive. It is a wonderful racket that fulfilled such a selfish wish.

      It is difficult to rotate the A side if you hit it or bite it too much, but if you feel like you can bite it into a sponge, you can rotate it firmly. It may be difficult to keep it short.

      The Z side has a good ball holding and is easy to handle even with hard rubber, but if you meet firmly, it will fly properly. The feeling of flying when you want to fly and being suppressed when you want to suppress it.

      The grip is thin and I personally love it, but it's a thinness that I like.

      If the usage is clear, I think it's quite a masterpiece.

      See original review

      2021/07/17
      Overall
      9/10
      Speed
      9
      Spin
      9
      Control
      9
      Touch
      10
      Hardness little hard

      Recommended rubber (Forehand) TENERGY 05

      Recommended rubber (Backhand) DNA DRAGON GRIP〈55°〉

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      (Experience:2〜3 years) I like it already /////

      Player reviews

      "design"
      The design is perfect for red-black, purple-black, and boys! !! I was also drawn there at first!
      "Functionality"
      The speed is high and the shot feeling is very good. If you are forced to talk about the disadvantages, it is the weight. I like heavy ones, but I think it's a little difficult for those who haven't dealt with it very much. I felt that. The times are ice cream ☆

      See original review

      2021/05/07
      Overall
      9/10
      Speed
      9
      Spin
      8
      Control
      9
      Touch
      10
      Hardness Little soft

      Recommended rubber (Forehand) TENERGY 05

      Recommended rubber (Backhand) ROZENA

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      (Experience:Less than a year) My first hybrid blade

      Player reviews

      my style of play matches this wood. especially on the "Z" for the forehand and "A" for the backhand. This wood uses a limb so that it has the dwell time to do a top spin

      I suggest for the "Z" side use medium or medium hardness rubber. for side "A", use the soft one that has a spring spoon or something like that so that the ball can flow

      2021/04/04
      Overall
      9/10
      Speed
      9
      Spin
      9
      Control
      8
      Touch
      9
      Hardness little hard

      Recommended rubber (Forehand) RASANTER R53

      Recommended rubber (Backhand) ROZENA

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • Dai-chan junior high school teacher

      (Experience:11〜20 years) Isn't it bad

      Player reviews

      It is a racket that tickles the man's heart that special materials are different on both sides.
      Axilium with Zylon Carbon
      Write Zephyrium compared to Acrylate Carbon

      The Axilium is a lot more crazy.
      I feel a lot of hardness compared to Inner Force ZLC. I also feel that I don't have much sense of grasping.
      The power of the drive is greater than the inner force. It will fly fairly straight.
      The impression is that the flight distance is not so great.
      Down rotation is quite difficult
      I felt that there was not much merit of the inner racket.

      Zephyrium had a fairly light shot feeling.
      It flies more than the inner force alc, but the grip part is weak
      It's not the feeling I'm looking for.
      I felt a lot of hardness in the tabletop processing, and I honestly felt that it was impossible to use it in the game.
      To be honest, I feel good with double-sided axleium

      This racket feels like an outer racket. So I don't think it's necessary to use the inner racket because it doesn't make sense.

      See original review

      2021/03/07
      Overall
      7/10
      Speed
      8
      Spin
      7
      Control
      5
      Touch
      7
      Hardness little hard

      Recommended rubber (Forehand) TENERGY 05

      Recommended rubber (Backhand) Rakza 7 Soft

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • HIAMA

      (Experience:2〜3 years) Interesting racket.

      Player reviews

      It's quite interesting because it contains different special materials on both sides. It is good to use it according to your own style.
      I put the front software on the A side (using the back), but it feels super good as if it hits. The ball is released quickly, so it is powerful.
      I pasted the back software on the Z side. Since the emphasis is on rotation, the momentum is certainly suppressed from the A side, but it is stable by that amount and you can put out a ball with good rotation. Especially the loop drive was a good feeling.
      However, the rubber attached was softer than expected (first purchase), so it was difficult to decide on the foreground. It is better to stick a hard rubber on the Z side.
      Overall, this racket is really recommended for those who change the way they hit the fore and back. I think that people who use tables are especially well worth using. Even on the back and back, this racket is also suitable for people who hit the back with meat type or who are worried about the technique of either foreback and have to decide the racket according to one. Since it is used by Korean player Yeong-sik, the quality can be guaranteed, so if you are interested in it, I think there is no loss in buying it.

      See original review

      2021/01/05
      Overall
      10/10
      Speed
      9
      Spin
      9
      Control
      9
      Touch
      10
      Hardness little hard

      Recommended rubber (Forehand) OMEGA V TOUR DF

      Recommended rubber (Backhand) VO>102

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    1. 1
    2. 2
    3. Next >
    Post a review

    Top Players

    Country

    Style

    Welcome to the table tennis Navi!

    Sign up!