ICE CREAM AZX I

Everyone's rating

[Hardness] Little hard
[Performance] Speed and Spin are excellent.

(Click to show big size)

Averages reviews points

Evaluation: 9.23 / 10

Number of review: 13

Speed：9.08
Spin：8.77
Control：8.69

PERFECT BALANCE OF PERFORMANCE & POWER CREATED BY HYBRID COMPOSITE: ZEPHYLIUM CARBON (ZLC) and ARYLATE CARBON (ALC), both with clear distinctive performance in one blade provides the players with variety of choices during game play. Depending on the game situation, the player can switch the spin, power and speed by switching front and back of the blade.

FL
ST
Chinese pen

Specifications

Producer: XIOM

Product code: 21101、21103

Weight: 88g

Material: Wood, ALC, ZL carbon, 7 ply wood

Thickness: 5.7mm

User reviews

Post a review

All Monthly

Tomoyan （Experience：４〜５ years） First-class product in appearance and performance Verified Purchase

The z side is more stable and the ball goes. Side A is easy to play and the ball is released a little faster. The grip is quite thin, so you need to get used to it. The front rubber is pasted on the A side, but it is very compatible. It looks cool, so I recommend it to anyone who wants to do something different.

See original review Hide original review

2020/10/16

Overall	9/10
Speed	10
Spin	9
Control	9
Touch	9
Hardness	Little soft

Recommended rubber (Forehand) RASANTER R48

Recommended rubber (Backhand) VO＞102

Was this review helpful to you? Like!

2

mix Recommended for intermediate students! !

Currently I am using Jupiter 2 on both sides of the galaxy, but I also tried in tension systems such as Fastark G1 and Tenagi.

a nice place
I think our middle class is not good at either the fore or the back. In that respect, the special materials used on both sides are different, so they make up for the difficulty. I think that it is easy to use basically because it is compatible with any rubber. As it is an inner, it is possible to do fine technology (stop) etc without any problem, and it is easy to handle because it does not fly away because it flies moderately.

bad place
As the grip is as thin as Kenta Matsudaira, if you put extra thickness on both sides, the racket will be top heavy, so some people may feel heavy.

Summary
There was no major disadvantage.
I think it is a really good racket.

See original review Hide original review

2019/07/09

Overall	9/10
Speed	9
Spin	10
Control	9
Touch	9
Hardness	little hard

Was this review helpful to you? Like!

16

Kinky Good back stickiness

Racket weight: 85g (The average was 87g when I measured some)
Fore: Side A, Tenergy 05 Extra Thick
Back: Z side DNA Dragon Grip MAX
Gross weight: 183g

The A side feels like outer carbon, and the Z side feels like inner carbon.
Even though it's an inner, it's surprisingly stiff and cool. However, the Z side has a proper ball holding, which is compatible with adhesive rubber.

Until now, it was Tenergy 05 with inner carbon, but I want more power ... But I also want softness because it is back adhesive. It is a wonderful racket that fulfilled such a selfish wish.

It is difficult to rotate the A side if you hit it or bite it too much, but if you feel like you can bite it into a sponge, you can rotate it firmly. It may be difficult to keep it short.

The Z side has a good ball holding and is easy to handle even with hard rubber, but if you meet firmly, it will fly properly. The feeling of flying when you want to fly and being suppressed when you want to suppress it.

The grip is thin and I personally love it, but it's a thinness that I like.

If the usage is clear, I think it's quite a masterpiece.

See original review Hide original review

2021/07/17

Overall	9/10
Speed	9
Spin	9
Control	9
Touch	10
Hardness	little hard

Recommended rubber (Forehand) TENERGY 05

Recommended rubber (Backhand) DNA DRAGON GRIP〈55°〉

Was this review helpful to you? Like!

4

Ice cream AZXI （Experience：２〜３ years） I like it already /////

"design"
The design is perfect for red-black, purple-black, and boys! !! I was also drawn there at first!
"Functionality"
The speed is high and the shot feeling is very good. If you are forced to talk about the disadvantages, it is the weight. I like heavy ones, but I think it's a little difficult for those who haven't dealt with it very much. I felt that. The times are ice cream ☆

See original review Hide original review

2021/05/07

Overall	9/10
Speed	9
Spin	8
Control	9
Touch	10
Hardness	Little soft

Recommended rubber (Forehand) TENERGY 05

Recommended rubber (Backhand) ROZENA

Was this review helpful to you? Like!

1

Ilmi, M. F. （Experience：Less than a year） My first hybrid blade

my style of play matches this wood. especially on the "Z" for the forehand and "A" for the backhand. This wood uses a limb so that it has the dwell time to do a top spin

I suggest for the "Z" side use medium or medium hardness rubber. for side "A", use the soft one that has a spring spoon or something like that so that the ball can flow

2021/04/04

Overall	9/10
Speed	9
Spin	9
Control	8
Touch	9
Hardness	little hard

Recommended rubber (Forehand) RASANTER R53

Recommended rubber (Backhand) ROZENA

Was this review helpful to you? Like!

0

Dai-chan junior high school teacher （Experience：１１〜２０ years） Isn't it bad

It is a racket that tickles the man's heart that special materials are different on both sides.
Axilium with Zylon Carbon
Write Zephyrium compared to Acrylate Carbon

The Axilium is a lot more crazy.
I feel a lot of hardness compared to Inner Force ZLC. I also feel that I don't have much sense of grasping.
The power of the drive is greater than the inner force. It will fly fairly straight.
The impression is that the flight distance is not so great.
Down rotation is quite difficult
I felt that there was not much merit of the inner racket.

Zephyrium had a fairly light shot feeling.
It flies more than the inner force alc, but the grip part is weak
It's not the feeling I'm looking for.
I felt a lot of hardness in the tabletop processing, and I honestly felt that it was impossible to use it in the game.
To be honest, I feel good with double-sided axleium

This racket feels like an outer racket. So I don't think it's necessary to use the inner racket because it doesn't make sense.

See original review Hide original review

2021/03/07

Overall	7/10
Speed	8
Spin	7
Control	5
Touch	7
Hardness	little hard

Recommended rubber (Forehand) TENERGY 05

Recommended rubber (Backhand) Rakza 7 Soft

Was this review helpful to you? Like!

4

HIAMA （Experience：４〜５ years） Interesting racket.

It's quite interesting because it contains different special materials on both sides. It is good to use it according to your own style.
I put the front software on the A side (using the back), but it feels super good as if it hits. The ball is released quickly, so it is powerful.
I pasted the back software on the Z side. Since the emphasis is on rotation, the momentum is certainly suppressed from the A side, but it is stable by that amount and you can put out a ball with good rotation. Especially the loop drive was a good feeling.
However, the rubber attached was softer than expected (first purchase), so it was difficult to decide on the foreground. It is better to stick a hard rubber on the Z side.
Overall, this racket is really recommended for those who change the way they hit the fore and back. I think that people who use tables are especially well worth using. Even on the back and back, this racket is also suitable for people who hit the back with meat type or who are worried about the technique of either foreback and have to decide the racket according to one. Since it is used by Korean player Yeong-sik, the quality can be guaranteed, so if you are interested in it, I think there is no loss in buying it.

See original review Hide original review

2021/01/05