NO.1 table tennis review site

User reviews

• 

  Tomoyan （Experience：４〜５ years） First-class product in appearance and performance Verified Purchase

  

  The z side is more stable and the ball goes. Side A is easy to play and the ball is released a little faster. The grip is quite thin, so you need to get used to it. The front rubber is pasted on the A side, but it is very compatible. It looks cool, so I recommend it to anyone who wants to do something different.

  See original review Hide original review

  z面のほうが安定してボールがいきます。Ａ面は弾きが良く球離れが少し早いです。グリップがかなり細いので慣れが必要です。Ａ面に表ラバーを貼ってますが凄く相性が良いです。見た目がカッコいいので人と違う事をしたい方はおすすめします。

  2020/10/16

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Touch	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommended rubber (Forehand) RASANTER R48

  Recommended rubber (Backhand) VO＞102

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  mix Recommended for intermediate students! !

  

  Currently I am using Jupiter 2 on both sides of the galaxy, but I also tried in tension systems such as Fastark G1 and Tenagi.

  a nice place
  I think our middle class is not good at either the fore or the back. In that respect, the special materials used on both sides are different, so they make up for the difficulty. I think that it is easy to use basically because it is compatible with any rubber. As it is an inner, it is possible to do fine technology (stop) etc without any problem, and it is easy to handle because it does not fly away because it flies moderately.

  bad place
  As the grip is as thin as Kenta Matsudaira, if you put extra thickness on both sides, the racket will be top heavy, so some people may feel heavy.

  Summary
  There was no major disadvantage.
  I think it is a really good racket.

  See original review Hide original review

  現在は両面銀河の木星2を使用してますが、ファスタークG1やテナジーなどのテンション系でも試しました。

  良い所
  僕達中級者はフォアやバックのどちらか一方は苦手だと思います。その点、両面使用してる特殊素材が違うのでその苦手を補ってくれてます。どのラバーでも相性がいいので基本的に使いやすいと思います。インナーなので細かい技術(ストップ)なども問題なく出来ますし、程よく飛んでくれるのでぶっ飛び仕様ではないので扱いやすいです。

  悪いところ
  グリップが松平健太並に細いので、両面に特厚を貼るとラケットがトップヘビーになるので人によっては重く感じたりするかもしれません。

  総括
  大きなデメリットはありませんでした。
  本当にいいラケットだと思います。

  2019/07/09

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	10
  Control	9
  Touch	9
  Hardness	little hard

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  15

• 

  Ilmi, M. F. （Experience：Less than a year） My first hybrid blade

  

  my style of play matches this wood. especially on the "Z" for the forehand and "A" for the backhand. This wood uses a limb so that it has the dwell time to do a top spin

  I suggest for the "Z" side use medium or medium hardness rubber. for side "A", use the soft one that has a spring spoon or something like that so that the ball can flow

  2021/04/04

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Touch	9
  Hardness	little hard

  Recommended rubber (Forehand) RASANTER R53

  Recommended rubber (Backhand) ROZENA

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

• 

  Dai-chan junior high school teacher （Experience：１１〜２０ years） Isn't it bad

  

  It is a racket that tickles the man's heart that special materials are different on both sides.
  Axilium with Zylon Carbon
  Write Zephyrium compared to Acrylate Carbon

  The Axilium is a lot more crazy.
  I feel a lot of hardness compared to Inner Force ZLC. I also feel that I don't have much sense of grasping.
  The power of the drive is greater than the inner force. It will fly fairly straight.
  The impression is that the flight distance is not so great.
  Down rotation is quite difficult
  I felt that there was not much merit of the inner racket.

  Zephyrium had a fairly light shot feeling.
  It flies more than the inner force alc, but the grip part is weak
  It's not the feeling I'm looking for.
  I felt a lot of hardness in the tabletop processing, and I honestly felt that it was impossible to use it in the game.
  To be honest, I feel good with double-sided axleium

  This racket feels like an outer racket. So I don't think it's necessary to use the inner racket because it doesn't make sense.

  See original review Hide original review

  特殊素材が両面で違うものが入っているという男心をくすぐるようなラケットです。
  アクシリウムをザイロンカーボン
  ゼフィリウムをアリレートカーボンと比べて書きます

  アクシリウムのほうはかなりのぶっ飛びです。
  インナーフォースZLCと比べるとかなり硬さを感じます。また掴む感覚もあまりないように感じます。
  ドライブの威力はインナーフォースよりもでます。かなり直線的に飛んでいきます。
  飛距離はあまり出ない印象です。
  下回転打ちはかなり難しい
  インナーラケットのメリットがあまりないように感じました。

  ゼフィリウムはかなりもっさりした打球感でした。
  インナーフォースalcよりは飛びますが、つかみの部分が弱いです
  自分が求めている感じではないです。
  台上処理でかなり硬さを感じてしまい、試合で使うには正直無理な気がしました。
  正直両面アクシリウムでいい気がします

  このラケットは打った感触はアウターラケットに近い感じがします。なのでインナーラケットの意味がないので使う必要なない気がします

  2021/03/07

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	7
  Control	5
  Touch	7
  Hardness	little hard

  Recommended rubber (Forehand) TENERGY 05

  Recommended rubber (Backhand) Rakza 7 Soft

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

• 

  HIAMA （Experience：２〜３ years） Interesting racket.

  

  It's quite interesting because it contains different special materials on both sides. It is good to use it according to your own style.
  I put the front software on the A side (using the back), but it feels super good as if it hits. The ball is released quickly, so it is powerful.
  I pasted the back software on the Z side. Since the emphasis is on rotation, the momentum is certainly suppressed from the A side, but it is stable by that amount and you can put out a ball with good rotation. Especially the loop drive was a good feeling.
  However, the rubber attached was softer than expected (first purchase), so it was difficult to decide on the foreground. It is better to stick a hard rubber on the Z side.
  Overall, this racket is really recommended for those who change the way they hit the fore and back. I think that people who use tables are especially well worth using. Even on the back and back, this racket is also suitable for people who hit the back with meat type or who are worried about the technique of either foreback and have to decide the racket according to one. Since it is used by Korean player Yeong-sik, the quality can be guaranteed, so if you are interested in it, I think there is no loss in buying it.

  See original review Hide original review

  両面に異なる特殊素材が入ってることですが、かなり面白いです。自分のスタイルに合わせて使えるのが良いです。
  A面には表ソフトを貼りましたが（バック使用）、当たれば入る並みに超好感触です。球離れが早いこともあって、威力も出ます。
  Z面には裏ソフトを貼りました。回転重視ということもあり、弾みは確かにA面より抑えられてますが、その分安定して、いい回転のボールを出せます。特にループドライブは好感触でした。
  ただ、貼っているラバーが予想以上に柔らかかった（初買い）ため、フォアで決めるのが難しかったです。Z面は硬めのラバーを貼ったほうがいいです。
  総評として、このラケットはフォアとバックで打ち方が変わる人には本当にお勧めできます。表を使ってる人とかは特に使う価値が十分にあると思います。裏裏でも、バックはミート系の打ち方をする人や、フォアバックどちらかの技術が不安で、一方に合わせてラケットを決めないと…って人にもこのラケットはマッチします。韓国のジョンヨンシク選手が使ってる、ということもあり、質も保証できるので、少しでも興味がある人は、買って損はないと思います。

  2021/01/05

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Touch	10
  Hardness	little hard

  Recommended rubber (Forehand) OMEGA V TOUR DF

  Recommended rubber (Backhand) VO＞102

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  Table tennis coach （Experience：More than ２０ years） Review from the pen holder

  

  I used a racket for trial hitting to play a ball, and after practicing multiple balls, I realized that the feeling transmitted from the racket was superior to the carbon racket I had used so far, so I bought it the next week.
  I have been sticking to pen drive for many years and played table tennis, but in recent years I have not met a good racket and I was able to meet this racket with the desire to change to the current mainstream shake.
  Of course, I am currently using this racket both as a leader and as a player.
  At the time of the test hit, double-sided tenergy 05 special thickness, the rubber I am currently using is fore Q5 special thickness, the back is G1 special thickness Both are the best settings for me

  See original review Hide original review

  試打用のラケットで球だし、多球練習させてもらいラケットから伝わって来る感覚が今までの使用したカーボンラケットより優れていると実感して翌週には購入してしまいました。
  長年ペンドライブにこだわって卓球をしていましたが近年良いラケットと巡り会いがなく現在の主流シェークに変えたいという思いの中、このラケットと巡り会うことができました。
  勿論、現在は指導者としても選手としてもこのラケットを使用しています。
  試打の時は両面テナジー05特厚、現在私が使っているラバーはフォアQ5特厚、バックはG1特厚どちらも私に取ってはベストセッティングです

  2020/09/29

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Touch	10
  Hardness	little hard

  Recommended rubber (Forehand) Q5

  Recommended rubber (Backhand) Fastarc G-1

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  azu （Experience：２〜３ years） Playing is fun with a new sensation!

  

  When I bought it at the shop, I was asked to do a pool, but I was very surprised that the difference in momentum was firmly present even in the inner. Personally, the ease of rotation that I could not think of as a special material when the fore was set to the Z surface was wonderful. I hit the back a bit like a meat, so it was very compatible with the A side, which had a quick ball separation. The shot feel is very good and the grip design is very cool, so you can enjoy playing very much. ‥

  See original review Hide original review

  ショップで購入する際に玉突きをさせてもらったのですが、インナーでも弾みの違いがしっかり出ていてとても驚きました。個人的にはフォアをZ面にしたときの特殊素材とは思えないほどの回転の掛けやすさが素晴らしかったです。自分はバックは若干ミート気味に打つので玉離れの早いＡ面ととても相性が良かったです。打球感がとても良いのとグリップのデザインがとてもかっこいいので、プレーがとても楽しめます。　

  2020/08/18

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	10
  Control	8
  Touch	10
  Hardness	little hard

  Recommended rubber (Forehand) OMEGA VII PRO

  Recommended rubber (Backhand) HEXER GRIP

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  3

1. 1
2. 2
3. Next >

Related racket

• 
  ICE CREAM AZX
• 
  FEEL ZX 2
• 
  FEEL ZX 3
• 
  OMEGA EURO