FACTIVE

Everyone's rating [Hardness] Little soft
[Performance] Control and Speed to have excellent
FACTIVE

(Click to zoom the photo)

Averages reviews points

  • Rating: 8 / 10
  • 106 reviews
    • Speed:7.37
    • Spin:7.33
    • Control:8.34

    Reviews of FACTIVE. Players who use Rubber evaluate various points such as hardness of the sponge, speed, control, spin, and feel at impact thoroughly.(Page 13)

    • Pimples in

    Specifications

    Price
    4,500 Yen(Include tax 4,950 Yen)
    Producer
    Nittaku
    Product code
    NR-8720
    Speed
    14.75
    Spin
    11.75
    Hardness
    35.0
    Customer Reviews SummaryAI Summary
    Highly rated as a versatile rubber for beginners to intermediate players, characterized by excellent control and good ball retention. However, advanced players point out insufficient power and spin quantity.
    ■ Frequently Mentioned Points
    • Superior control performance, easy to master table techniques
    • Clear ball gripping sensation ideal for fundamental skill learning
    • Excellent value with affordable price and good durability
    • Speed and spin tend to fall short of expectations
    • Particularly recommended as a second rubber and back rubber
    ■ Representative Voices
    ▲ PositiveThe rubber grips the ball well so anyone can improve at table tennis. It's affordable with good durability, making it the best match for those wanting to level up fundamental techniques.
    ▽ CriticalThe high control comes at a cost of insufficient speed and spin. When hitting harder, it behaves like a short pimple rubber with overly linear trajectory.

    Reviews by user

    • Sasami

      Sasami (Experience: 6〜10 years) For beginners...?

      Reviews by user

      The sponge is soft, but the sheet is fairly hard.
      If you put it on a special-material or 7-ply blade, the blade's bounce sends the ball off before the sponge can even engage, so you can't really grip the ball.
      As for lifting backspin, a 5-ply blade can just about manage it, but on a blade with hard-or-more bounce, brushing the ball is difficult.
      The speed is decent enough - fairly average for the price range, but slow compared to rubbers overall.
      It's easy to use in topspin rallies. Given the stability of blocks and meet shots, it suits beginners on the backhand who don't use a third-ball backhand topspin drive.

      See original review

      2017/09/11
      All
      2/10
      Speed
      6
      Spin
      7
      Control
      4
      Hardness Little hard

      Racket recommended use CLIPPER WOOD

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • sho-go

      sho-go (Experience: 11〜20 years) A top performer, but...

      Reviews by user

      A friend of mine uses this, and this is my impression after getting to hit with it.

      The first thing I noticed hitting with this rubber was how well balanced it is.
      It's on the softer side, but in the short game it doesn't behave as wildly as I expected, and stops and flicks aren't hard to do either.
      Topspin drives arc nicely.
      Lifting backspin isn't hard either.
      Blocking is also easy.
      Every technique felt balanced and reassuring.
      It really reminded me of the feeling of hitting with the old Hammond series coated in glue, back in the day.

      That said, how you rate this rubber will probably depend a lot on what you're looking for.
      It's a well-balanced, model-student type of rubber, but since it doesn't have much personality, it feels like a rubber that's hard to make your own signature with.

      Speed and spin fall short compared to high-end rubbers.
      You won't get tacky-rubber-style tricky balls out of it.
      It's also hard to produce nasty shots in the short game.

      If you're looking for some kind of personality in a rubber, I don't think this one fits.

      On the flip side, I'd recommend this for shakehand players whose backhand is mostly blocking.
      It also seems like it would suit the reverse side of a penhold blade.

      Also, I think it could work as a rubber for both sides for a beginner who's been playing table tennis for a while and has developed some basic skill.
      Paired with a Swat blade, it feels like a combination that's cost-effective and can be used for a long time.

      See original review

      2017/09/10
      All
      7/10
      Speed
      6
      Spin
      6
      Control
      7
      Hardness Little soft

      Racket recommended use Swat

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • Monitan.

      Monitan. (Experience: 11〜20 years) Good value for money.

      Reviews by user

      The performance wasn't quite what I expected, but I think it's more of a speed-oriented rubber than a spin-oriented one.
      I'd put it in the easy-to-use category.

      The value for money is good, and the purple sponge looks cool.
      Beginners, why not give it a try?

      See original review

      2017/08/31
      All
      7/10
      Speed
      7
      Spin
      6
      Control
      8
      Hardness Soft

      Racket recommended use Seputia C

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • You Arakaki

      You Arakaki (Experience: 6〜10 years) Just amazing

      Reviews by user

      I put this on for my younger brother (he'd been using Mark V), and he made it to the final four at the prefectural cadet tournament. It's apparently excellent for developing feel and spin technique, and the spin really grips a lot (according to a Mark V user's judgment).

      See original review

      2017/08/03
      All
      5/10
      Speed
      8
      Spin
      8
      Control
      7
      Hardness Little soft
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • Spin Monster

      Spin Monster (Experience: 11〜20 years) Very good balance

      Reviews by user

      After switching to tension rubbers, I had this on my forehand for a long time.
      It seems to be a milder, more well-rounded version of the same maker's Fastarc C1.
      You can play a stable game with just the right balance across every technique.
      The light weight is also a plus, and considering the price and lifespan, the value for money is quite excellent.
      Personally, I found the bounce when playing away from the table, and the sharpness on serves, a bit lacking, but for the purpose of getting used to tension rubbers, it didn't bother me.
      Given the hardness, I also thought it would work fine on the backhand.

      See original review

      2017/07/26
      All
      7/10
      Speed
      7
      Spin
      7
      Control
      8
      Hardness Little soft

      Racket recommended use Deneb

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • Zaki

      Zaki (Experience: 6〜10 years) Consistently high level, I'd say

      Reviews by user

      Speed shots feel sharp, but I think the power is a bit on the modest side.
      The short game and blocking are quite stable.
      Personally, being able to hit a low, extending topspin drive with high precision is really great.

      See original review

      2017/06/27
      All
      9/10
      Speed
      7
      Spin
      8
      Control
      9
      Hardness Little soft
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      Hiyuu (Experience: 6〜10 years)

      Reviews by user

      Stops are easy to do, but they lack power.
      Lifting backspin is also hard, so it felt different from what I expected.
      I think it's good for the backhand though.

      See original review

      2017/06/05
      All
      3/10
      Speed
      4
      Spin
      3
      Control
      5
      Hardness Soft

      Racket recommended use Innerforce AL

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    1. « First
    2. 9
    3. 10
    4. 11
    5. 12
    6. 13
    7. 14
    8. 15
    9. 16
    Post a review

    Top Players

    Country

    Style