NO.1 table tennis review site

Reviews by user

• 

  vendor （Experience：６〜１０ years） Rotation performance is high, easy to use for hardness Verified Purchase

  

  merit
  ・Lots of rotation
  ・Tamamochi
  ・Drive stability

  Demerit
  ・The speed is not so high
  ・Back side control

  It is an attack type behind the scenes.
  I want to fight with confident service and drive,
  I came across this rubber when I was looking for a rubber that rotates.

  Let's touch on the benefits
  Because the service often takes rotation, the opponent's stop often comes out of the table
  Easy to connect to loop drive.
  The loop drive also has a lot of rotation, and even if it is countered, it is over.
  It's easy to get points.
  The impression is that it is difficult to become a stick ball because it has a good ball retention for its hardness and the speed drive also rotates.

  Next is the disadvantage
  The first thing that comes to my mind is the lack of speed.
  Compared to Tiber's MX-D, which I used before, the speed is inferior.
  Rather, MX-D is too early? .
  In back-to-back practice and back blocks against drives
  I have the impression that it is difficult. Platinum H is recommended for the back side. M is too soft.

  In conclusion, it has an impact that can handle 52.5 degrees,
  It is a highly recommended rubber for those who want to take the initiative in rotation.

  See original review Hide original review

  メリット
  ・回転量が多い
  ・玉持ち
  ・ドライブの安定性

  デメリット
  ・スピードはそこまで出ない
  ・バック面のコントロール

  当方裏々の攻撃型です。
  自信があるサービスとドライブを生かした戦い方をしたく、
  回転がかかるラバーを探していたところこのラバーに出会いました。

  メリットに触れていきます
  サービスはよく回転がかかるおかげで、相手のストップも台から出ることが多いため
  ループドライブにつなげやすい。
  ループドライブも回転量が多く、カウンターされてもオーバーばかりで
  点も取りやすいです。
  硬度のわりに玉持ちがよくスピードドライブも回転がかかるため、棒玉になりにくい印象。

  次にデメリットです
  一番先に思うのがスピードが出ない。
  以前使っていたティバーのMX-Dとの比較になりますが、スピードは劣ります。
  というより、MX-Dが早すぎる？。
  練習でのバック対バックやドライブに対してのバックブロックでは
  難しい印象があります。バック面はプラチナH推奨。Mだと柔らかすぎる。

  結論ですが、52.5度を扱えるインパクトを持っており、
  回転で主導権を握りたい方には大変おすすめできるラバーです。

  2022/09/11

  All	10/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	10
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use FORTIUS FT ver.D RE

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  9

• 

  do You can rub it, you can let it bite you Verified Purchase

  

  I think that anyone who can swing the basic drive can handle it.
  The top sheet catches well, and even if it bites in, it draws an arc stably, so the balance is very good.
  It is easy to do loops, bangs, lower rotation strikes, and benches.
  Does the surface of the rubber absorb water easily? So it may be a little weak against sweat and humidity.
  The list price is quite high, but if you shop online, you can buy it for around 5,000 yen, so I think you can continue to use it for a while with this price and this performance.

  See original review Hide original review

  クリッパーウッド（木材7枚合板）のフォア面でMAXを使用。
  やや硬めですが、実際の硬度より打球感は柔らかく感じます。
  基本のドライブのスイングができている方なら扱えると思いますが、アウターラケットでは技術、パワーともに必要になると思われます。
  トップシートの引っかかりがよく、ループがしっかりかかります。
  また、スポンジに食い込ませても安定して弧線を描き威力が出るため非常にバランスがよい。
  ループ、強打、下回転打ち、台上、ほぼほぼやりやすいです。
  サーブを切るときだけはコツがいるかもしれません。
  ラバー表面に水分が吸着しやすい？ので汗や湿気に少し弱いかも。
  定価はかなり高いですが、ネット通販なら5,000円台で購入も可能なため、この値段でこの性能ならしばらく使い続けたいと思います。

  2022/09/01

  All	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	8
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use CLIPPER WOOD

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  10

• 

  STIGA mania （Experience：１１〜２０ years） Tsuttsuki's best rubber ever Verified Purchase

  

  I pasted it on Timo Boll alc.
  The outer racket is difficult to control. I don't have enough balls, so I think the best match is wood or inner.

  Tsuttsuki is the best. I've always thought that leopards would cut the most, but this is the best rubber in tension.
  You can almost win with Tsuttsuki!

  However, it is difficult to attack because it is hard and requires swing speed. If you don't shake it, you won't get a good ball.
  Compared to Lazanta R53, Lazanta is much easier to hit. However, Platinum XH can obtain an abnormal amount of rotation.
  Therefore, it is still for advanced users. Also, the advanced cutman is the best!
  I will use it for a while. For now, I'm hard to use, but I'm still winning.

  See original review Hide original review

  ティモボルalcに貼りました。
  アウターのラケットはコントロールが難しいです。球持ちが足りないのでベストマッチは木材かインナーではないかと思います。

  ツッツキが最高です。私はこれまでキョウヒョウが一番切れると思ってましたが、これはテンションの中では最高クラスのラバーです。
  ほとんどツッツキで勝てます！

  ただし、硬くてスイングスピードが求められるので、攻撃が難しいです。めちゃくちゃ振らないといい球がいかないです。
  ラザンターR53と比べて、ラザンターのほうがだいぶ打ちやすいです。ただ、プラチナXHは異常な回転量を得られます。
  ゆえに、やはり上級者向けです。あと、カットマンの上級者は最高でしょう！
  私はしばらく使ってみます。今の所、自分は使いづらいのに、勝てることが続いています。

  2021/10/21

  All	10/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	10
  Control	6
  Hardness	Hard

  Racket recommended use Timo Boll ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  19

• 

  katsuo000_2 （Experience：More than ２０ years） Post-tenergy's best grip, rotation performance and stability!

  

  53g hardness tester (Tena 05): Sheet side 45.4 (44.6), Sponge side 44.6 (43.3)
  -Easy to handle and high rotation performance that does not make you feel 52.5 °!
  -The grain of the sheet is thick, and it has a stronger grip than R53!
  -Good compatibility with wood and inner carbon!
  The seat bites well, and I felt that it was a rubber like Tena 05 or Tena 19 except for the weight. The counter is a little difficult because it looks like Tena.
  Even with a backhand loop drive with high rotation performance and low technical level, the other party flirted. Compared to R53 and MX-D, which have post-tenergy tension, R53 and MX-D have a finer grain that separates the ball quickly, while DNA Plastic XH has a thicker sheet and a stronger grip. .. The flashiness was modest, and the trajectory of the drive was a little mature in terms of the growth from the opponent's court. Even if the performance is underestimated, it is the same as Tena, and above all, the goodness of fitting on the table is a good impression, and I think that it will be a good option. It is a little heavy for its thin features, so if you take measures (small blade area and stick it away from the grip), you will be able to fully demonstrate the performance of rubber!
  Please refer.

  See original review Hide original review

  53g硬度計（テナ05）: シート側 45.4（44.6）、スポンジ側 44.6（43.3）
  ・52.5°を感じさせない扱いやすさと高い回転性能！
  ・シートの粒が太く、R53よりも強いグリップ感！
  ・木材系やインナーカーボンと相性良！
  シートのくい込みが良く、重量以外はテナ05かテナ19のようなラバーだと感じました。テナっぽいので、カウンターはやや難です。
  回転性能高く技術レベルの低いバックハンドのループドライブでも相手がふかしてくれました。ポストテナジー系テンションの、R53やMX-Dと比較すると、R53やMX-Dは球離れが速い粒細めに対し、DNAプラXHはシートの粒が太めでグリップ力の強さが特徴的でした。その分派手さも控えめでドライブの弾道も相手のコートについてからの伸びという点では、少々大人しさを感じました。性能は低く見積もってもテナと同等、何より台へのおさまりの良さが好印象、良い選択肢になると思います。特徴が希薄な割にやや重いので、対策（ブレード面積小ラケや、グリップから離して貼る）することで、十二分にラバーの性能を発揮するでしょう！
  参考ください。

  2021/07/30

  All	8/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Racket recommended use REINFORCE AC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  88

• 

  Nino （Experience：２〜３ years）

  

  It was a very good rubber because the drive speed was very fast and it took a lot of rotation. For advanced to intermediate players.

  See original review Hide original review

  ドライブのスピードがとても速く回転もかかるのでとてもいいラバーでした。上級者から中級者向けです。

  2024/11/13

  All	10/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	9
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use Innerforce Layer ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

• 

  I like table tennis （Experience：２〜３ years） Not a speed-based

  

  It feels soft for its hardness, and I think it can be used for both forehand and backhand. The rotation performance is also good, and it's easy to do chiquita!
  But there is one drawback, the lifespan is very short. At this price, it lasts about a month. Of course, it depends on the amount of practice. I practiced 10 hours a week, so it felt short. If you practice twice a week, you can use it for 2.5 to 3 months without any problems.

  See original review Hide original review

  硬度のわりに柔らかく感じフォアもバックもどっちでも使えると思います回転性能も文句がなく台上もいいです、チキータもやりやすい！
  でも1つ難点、寿命がすごく短いですこの値段で１ヶ月ぎりぐらいです練習量ももちろんあります自分は週に10時間はやっていたので、その分短く感じました、週2練習とかだったら2ヶ月半から3ヶ月は問題なく使えます

  2024/10/12

  All	10/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Racket recommended use FORTINO PRO DC INSIDE

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  dengar （Experience：１１〜２０ years）

  

  First, it's hard!
  However, since I have a lot of ball, it's better to hit it by digging into it rather than hooking it. I think it's a lovey-dovey rubber. I personally like it though.
  I think it's for people who play table tennis in the foreground.

  See original review Hide original review

  まず、硬い！
  でも、球持ちあるから引っ掛けるより食い込ませて打つ方が合ってる。結構好き嫌い別れるラバーだと思う。個人的には好きだけど。
  フォアで弾く卓球する人向けかなと思う。

  2024/03/18

  All	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Hardness	Hard

  Racket recommended use Innerforce Layer ZLC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

1. 1
2. 2
3. 3
4. 4
5. Next >

Related rubber

• 
  DNA Dragon power 57.5
• 
  DNA Dragon power 55
• 
  DNA Dragon power 52.5
• 
  DNA PLATINUM M