DNA PLATINUM XH

Everyone's rating [Hardness] Little hard
[Performance] Spin and Speed to have excellent
DNA PLATINUM XH
DNA PLATINUM XH DNA PLATINUM XH

(Click to zoom the photo)

Averages reviews points

  • Rating: 9.4 / 10
  • 5 reviews
    • Speed:9
    • Spin:9.2
    • Control:8.6

    Reviews of DNA PLATINUM XH. Players who use Rubber evaluate various points such as hardness of the sponge, speed, control, spin, and feel at impact thoroughly.

    • Pimples in

    Specifications

    Price
    8,000 Yen(Include tax 8,800 Yen)
    Producer
    STIGA
    Product code
    1712070523,1712070123

    Reviews by user

    • katsuo000_2

      (Experience:More than 20 years) Post-tenergy's best grip, rotation performance and stability!

      Reviews by user

      53g hardness tester (Tena 05): Sheet side 45.4 (44.6), Sponge side 44.6 (43.3)
      -Easy to handle and high rotation performance that does not make you feel 52.5 °!
      -The grain of the sheet is thick, and it has a stronger grip than R53!
      -Good compatibility with wood and inner carbon!
      The seat bites well, and I felt that it was a rubber like Tena 05 or Tena 19 except for the weight. The counter is a little difficult because it looks like Tena.
      Even with a backhand loop drive with high rotation performance and low technical level, the other party flirted. Compared to R53 and MX-D, which have post-tenergy tension, R53 and MX-D have a finer grain that separates the ball quickly, while DNA Plastic XH has a thicker sheet and a stronger grip. .. The flashiness was modest, and the trajectory of the drive was a little mature in terms of the growth from the opponent's court. Even if the performance is underestimated, it is the same as Tena, and above all, the goodness of fitting on the table is a good impression, and I think that it will be a good option. It is a little heavy for its thin features, so if you take measures (small blade area and stick it away from the grip), you will be able to fully demonstrate the performance of rubber!
      Please refer.

      See original review

      2021/07/30
      All
      8/10
      Speed
      7
      Spin
      9
      Control
      9
      Hardness Little soft

      Racket recommended use REINFORCE AC

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      (Experience:2〜3 years) Speed and grip!

      Reviews by user

      Compared to R53, which has similar sponge hardness
      The speed was equal to or higher than that, and above all, the rotation and grip were greatly exceeded.
      For a German rubber, the downward rotation is also good. The performance was worth the price, but it's still expensive, so I'm going to use the R53.

      See original review

      2021/10/19
      All
      9/10
      Speed
      9
      Spin
      9
      Control
      7
      Hardness Hard

      Racket recommended use TECHNIX

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      (Experience:6〜10 years) It ’s expensive, but it ’s bad.

      Reviews by user

      Overwhelming momentum at the fore hitting stage! And you can easily speed up even with a light hit! Since the seat is solid, you can hold the ball and it will fit stably! It takes a lot of rotation, but if it's just a seat, it's a little loose. If you bite into the rubber, you can hit a ball with a lot of speed and rotation, and even though it is deep and heavy, it is a god-like rubber that fits properly on the table. The hardness is 52.5, but it is not so hard and the sheet is soft and thin, so it is easy to enter the sponge and bite into the rubber! However, I thought that the ability of this rubber could not be maximized unless it was bitten and hit. If the loop is thin, it will be a very loose ball, so it is better to hold a sponge to get a ball that is difficult to pick up. Of all the tension rubbers I've used so far, this rubber is definitely the best performance. Those who are interested in it are expensive, but I recommend buying it.

      See original review

      2021/09/24
      All
      10/10
      Speed
      10
      Spin
      9
      Control
      9
      Hardness Little hard

      Racket recommended use CYPRESS T-MAX

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • Hide SEED

      (Experience:More than 20 years) Impressed by the good balance

      Reviews by user

      Shake back attack type
      Fore advanced, back intermediate level
      Currently using Fore Evolution MXD and Back Target Pro GT47
      After hitting for two days, both decided to change to DNA Platinum XH
      The reason for the change is that speed, stability, rotational force, and ease of technology (security) can be achieved at a high level.
      Comparing with the rubber used in the fore
      In terms of speed, there is Evolution MXD, but there is a sense of stability and fear of entering when hitting a ball.
      In terms of rotational force, Target Pro XD52.5 is better, but it gives a little sense of stability.
      The previous rubber was also good, but while I felt the advantages, I also felt the disadvantages.
      I personally think that the characteristic of DNA Platinum XH is that it has few drawbacks and many advantages.
      I am impressed that the back is easier to use than other rubbers for its high hardness.
      It's more powerful than the Target Pro GT47, so it's an intermediate level, but I'll change it for a while.
      There are many parts that I feel good about, and there are no drawbacks. This is my DNA Platinum XH.

      See original review

      2021/07/15
      All
      10/10
      Speed
      9
      Spin
      9
      Control
      9
      Hardness Hard

      Racket recommended use CARBONADO 45

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      (Experience:11〜20 years) Cutman long-awaited rubber

      Reviews by user

      I used it in the cut. From the conclusion, I think it will be the best piece for Hyundai Cutman. Needless to say, the attack power is high, and both rotation and speed are perfect. And although it is the main cut, I was honestly surprised that it fits well beyond my imagination from the momentum at the time of the attack. I originally used DNApro H 1.9, and I thought that this rubber with a sponge thickness of 2.3 would probably not be stable in cutting, but when I actually used it, it was easier to cut than I imagined, and over mistakes I didn't really care. The stability of the cut is not much different from when using DNAproH, and only the attack power is increased, which is a fairly good result. I don't think there are many rubbers that have both attack power and cut stability at such a high level.
      As a neck, the weight is heavy and the price is right. I am also wondering how long it will last. However, I think that it has the performance that is only expensive, and I think that it is a rubber that I would like people who are intermediate or above Cutman and those who are using the DNApro series to try it once.

      See original review

      2021/05/28
      All
      10/10
      Speed
      10
      Spin
      10
      Control
      9
      Hardness Little hard

      Racket recommended use DEFENSIVE CLASSIC

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    Post a review

    Top Players

    Country

    Style

    Welcome to the table tennis Navi!

    Sign up!