NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  Quantum X PRO

  

  50g at max.
  1 After all it looks like Tena 05! The sheet is softer than MX-P, the sponge is chewy, and it looks more like Tena 05! However, I think that the maximum rotation amount is higher for Tena 05. 2 Arch line goes up! Easy to spin down! 3 Similar but easier to meet than Tena 05!
  The impression is that the MX-P has evolved to support plastic balls and is a low-priced version. Quantum has a thinner and softer sheet and a thicker sponge, so it is easier to bite and handle, and it takes longer to rotate. I felt that Quantum slipped because it was easy to handle.
  As with all Tibhar rubbers, the rotation performance is a little lower than that of Tena, and I think that it is easier to meet.
  While Tena is still a rubber for driving, I think that Quantum and MX-P are easy to do meet and smash, angle hitting and backhand technology.
  I would appreciate it if you could refer to it.

  See original review Hide original review

  maxで50g。
  1やっぱりテナ05っぽい！MX-Pよりもシートがやわらかくてスポンジにコシがあり、よりテナ05っぽい！ただしMax回転量はテナ05の方が上だと思います。2弧線があがる！対下回転打ちがやりやすい！3似ているがテナ05よりもミート打ちがしやすい！
  MX-Pのプラボール対応の進化+廉価版という印象です。クァンタムの方がシートは薄くて柔らかくスポンジは厚いので、くい込みがよく扱いやすく回転も良くかかります。扱いやすい分、クァンタムの方が滑ると感じました。
  ティバーラバー全体に言えることですが、テナと比較すると回転性能が少し低く、その分、ミートがしやすいのが特徴だと思います。
  テナはやはりドライブのためのラバーである一方、クァンタムやMX-Pならミートやスマッシュ、角度打ちおよびバックハンド系技術がやりやすいと思います。
  ご参考いただければ幸いです。

  2021/02/15

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	7
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket Zhang Jike ZLC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  104

• 

  Zhang Jike ALC

  

  88g in FL. Currently main and formerly Zhang Jike ZLC.
  1. Stronger arc than ZLC! 2. The shot feeling and operability are similar to ZLC. Hold it firmly because it is soft! 3. Especially the backhand is good and you can feel the ball holding!
  In ZLC, I chose loop drive for a half-long ball with a lower rotation, but I like the fact that it is easier to power drive a half-long lower rotation because it draws a stronger arch line than ZLC. Compared to ZLC, it has a ball holding and the blade thickness is thick, so you can get a long distance, power and rotation, and you can feel like 7 plywood. Overall, the speed of the ball has slowed down.
  Compared to Timothy, it doesn't play, you can hold the ball firmly, and you can feel the good center of gravity of the grip.
  Compared to Stradivarius, there are few strange over mistakes, and I feel the difference due to the difference in composition (Aramid carbon with Ause as an adjunct, ALC and Limba's Zhang Jike ALC). I think that Zhang Jike ALC is preferred by more advanced people.
  The disadvantage is still the royal road, so is it difficult to differentiate from other players?
  We also review it on our blog, so please refer to it.

  See original review Hide original review

  FLで88g。現在メインで以前は張継科ZLC。
  1. ZLCよりも強い弧線！2. 打球感や操作性はZLCと相似。柔らかい分、しっかり持つ！3. 特にバックハンドが良く、球持ちを感じる！
  ZLCでは、下回転のハーフロングのボールに対しループドライブ一択でしたが、ZLCよりも強い弧線を描くので、ハーフロングくらいの下回転をパワードライブしやすくなったのが一番気に入っています。ZLCと比較すると球持ちがあってブレード厚さも厚いので飛距離も出て、パワーも出せ回転もかかって7枚合板っぽさを感じて良いです。全体的にはボールのスピードは落ちました。
  ティモスピと比較すると弾いてしまわず、しっかりボールを持てて良くて、グリップ重心の良さを感じる。
  ストラディバリウスと比較すると、変なオーバーミスが少なく、構成の違い（アラミドカーボンに添材がアユース、ALCとリンバの張継科ALC）による違いを感じます。張継科ALCの方がより上級者が好むと思います。
  デメリットはやはり王道ですので、他プレーヤーと差別化しづらい点でしょうか。
  ブログでもレビューしていますので、是非ご参考ください。

  2021/02/07

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber（Front） DIGNICS 05

  Recommend rubber（Back） TENERGY 05

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  101

• 

  TENERGY 19

  

  Extra-thick, stick with free chuck 2 and 47 g.
  1. Easy to power drive the 3rd ball! 2. It's soft, but it's easy to stop and counter drive and cheat! 3. It is easy to hit a drive with a high trajectory that jumps up from the opponent's court seen in Dignix in the upper rotation rally!
  At first, I thought it was suitable for the back and used it in the back.
  Sure, it's easy to catch and it's easy to put in with a hand-only Chiquita or backhand drive, and it's fun, but the quality has deteriorated. When I used it in the foreground, it was much better than I had imagined, and I enjoyed the features listed above. Compared to the rubber of 64 or 80 seats, the speed drive draws an arch line firmly and sinks, so if you can hit with the whole body with swing speed even if the tsutsuki is a little low or shallow, you can forcibly bring it to the power drive There was goodness. With the 64 series, the stop is inevitably floating and the loop drive is difficult, but the 19 is easy to power drive, and the stop and loop drive are also high quality, so I personally feel that it is a cheat rubber and it is a butterfly quality. It depends. It is also introduced on the blog, so please refer to it.

  See original review Hide original review

  特厚、フリーチャック2で貼って47 g。
  1. 3球目パワードライブがしやすい！2. 柔らかいのにストップやカウンタードライブがやりやすくてチート！3. 上回転ラリーでディグニクスでみられる相手のコートについてから上に跳ね上がる弾道の高いドライブが打ちやすい！
  はじめはバック向きかと思ってバックで使用しました。
  確かにひっかけやすく手だけのチキータやバックハンドドライブでも簡単に入れやすくて楽しくなりますが、質は低くなってしまいました。フォアで使ったら想像以上にかなり良くて、上に挙げるような特徴がガンガンでて楽しかったです。64や80のシートのラバーと比べても、スピードドライブがしっかり弧線を描いて沈むので多少ツッツキが低かったり浅くてもスイングスピードがあって全身で打つことができれば、強引にパワードライブに持っていける良さがありました。64系だとどうしてもストップが浮いたり、ループドライブが難しい印象ですが、19はパワードライブもしやすくて、ストップやループドライブも質が高いので個人的にはチートなラバーで流石バタフライクオリティーだなーと感じた次第です。ブログでも紹介しておりますので、是非ご参考ください。

  2021/03/05

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	8
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket LIN Gaoyuan ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  100

• 

  VEGA X

  

  52 g at max.
  1. Rotation is awesome! More than published performance! 2. The sheet is hard and the sponge is soft, so it is easy to counter and handle! 3. Exquisite balance that does not fly too much!
  As expected, the best masterpiece was convincing performance, and first of all, the rotation performance was high. Considering the ease of rotation, there is an image that it takes more rotation than the Omega 5 Tour DF. On the other hand, the issue was slipperiness, and I slipped quite a bit on Tsuttsuki and blocks. Since the sheet is hard and the sponge is soft rubber, it may be unavoidable that it is slippery. Even so, I was surprised at how good the rubber was when I included the cost performance. What is missed is that it is a little heavy, and I think it will be over 50 g. However, compared to the Omega 7 Tour and Pro, it was not a mad shot feeling, it was a rubber that was easy to play and could be used well even in the back.
  The amount of rotation is the same level as Tena 05, and I think that the speed will be as high as Tena 80.
  If you have a sense of being able to stop or drive a knuckle in consideration of slipping, I think this cospa is a pretty attractive rubber.
  We also review it on our blog, so please refer to it!

  See original review Hide original review

  maxで52 g。
  1. 回転がエグイ！公表性能以上！2. シートが硬くスポンジが柔らかいので、カウンターがしやすく扱いやすい！3. 飛び過ぎない絶妙なバランス！
  さすが最高傑作は納得の性能で、まず回転性能が高かったです。回転のかけやすさまで考慮すると、オメガ5ツアーDFよりも回転がかかるイメージがあります。一方で、課題は滑りやすさで、ツッツキやブロックで結構滑りました。シートが硬くスポンジが柔らかいラバーですので滑りやすいのは仕方ないかもしれません。それでもコスパまで含めるとかなり良いラバーで驚きました。惜しまれるのは少し重量が重い点で、50 gはオーバーしてくると思います。ただしオメガ7ツアーやプロと比較するとマッドな打球感ではなく、弾きやすくてバックでも十分使いこなせるラバーでした。
  回転量はテナ05と同等レベルで、スピードはテナ80並みには出ると思います。
  滑ることを考慮してストップしたりナックルドライブなどへ利用できるセンスのある人であれば、このコスパはかなり魅力的なラバーだと思います。
  ブログでもレビューしていますので、是非ご参考ください！

  2021/02/07

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	8
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket Zhang Jike ZLC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  96

• 

  Rakza X

  

  Extra thick 50g.
  ・ Strong grip! Grip power like Tena 05!
  -The seat is hard, and the tsutsuki and stops are firmly settled. The amount of rotation that is comparable to Rakuza 7!
  ・ Anyway, it's easy to put it on the other party's table!
  I decided to use it for my job. Recently, I strongly feel individual differences, but I still like the easy-to-use rubber. As for the performance I want more, I feel that the speed performance and the amount of rotation of Tsuttsuki are inferior to the dig 05. However, I like the fact that it is easier to handle than Digg 05 and you can rotate it firmly even if you only have your hands.
  I think that the amount of rotation is about the same as Tena 05 for Max, but I think that the amount of rotation that can be stably produced is less than that. It's not unusable in the foreground, but it was a little less powerful than the high-performance tena and dig.
  Please refer.

  See original review Hide original review

  特厚で50g。
  ・グリップ力が強い！テナ05のようなグリップ力！
  ・シートが硬く、ツッツキやストップがしっかりおさまる。ラクザ7に負けない回転量！
  ・とにかく相手の台に入れやすい！イメージ通りのボールが出しやすい！
  本職使用を決めました。
  性能が高いラバーではなく、「ハードなラバーなのに非常に扱いやすいラバー」で極めて気に入っています。
  ハードでしっかり回転がかかってボールがしっかり沈ませることができるのに、扱いやすいんです！
  おそらく、どんなスイングとインパクトでも弧線を作って相手コートに入りやすい設計になっているのだと思います。
  ディグ05と比較してしまうと、スピード性能と回転量は劣り、不満はあります。
  しかし、バタフライのラバーと比べると抜群に扱いやすく、バックにあうラバーだと思ってます。
  扱いやすさを活かしてバックで使用をおすすめします。
  ご参考ください。

  2021/01/01

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	8
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket Zhang Jike ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  93

1. 1
2. 2
3. 3
4. 4
5. 5
6. Next >
7. Last »