GLAYZER
Everyone's rating |
[Hardness] Medium hardness [Performance] Control and Spin to have excellent |
Averages reviews points
- Speed:8.46
- Spin:8.51
- Control:8.92
-
Reviews of GLAYZER. Players who use Rubber evaluate various points such as hardness of the sponge, speed, control, spin, and feel at impact thoroughly.(Page 4)
- Pimples in
Specifications
- Producer
- Butterfly
- Product code
- 06100
Reviews by user
-
-
i just like table tennis (Experience:4〜5 years) The Royal Rubber
-
I pasted it on the fore. The speed was decent, and the rotation and control were good.
Speaking of greed, I wanted a little more performance of the counter.
However, from a junior high school student's point of view, this cost performance is very appreciated with this performance.All Speed Spin Control Hardness Soft
Racket recommended use OVTCHAROV Innerforce ALC
-
-
-
Great Satan (Experience:4〜5 years) Good (^∀^)
-
I was interested in whether it was an enhanced version of Rosena, so I purchased it.
It was a rubber that I expected because it was a rubber that bounces more than Rosena and rotates more than Rosena. I think that it will be easier to use when combined with a wood racket or an inner racket. The sponge is harder than Rosena, so you may find it a little difficult to use, but it doesn't bother me that much.
Conclusion Good rubber! !All Speed Spin Control Hardness Little hard
Racket recommended use FORTIUS FT ver.D RE
-
-
-
G1 (Experience:4〜5 years) Comparison with G1
-
A comparison with the G1. First of all, when I drove, the g1 was a sharper drive. Grazer, on the other hand, draws an arc and is stable, and the ball stretches when it hits. As for hardness, the g1 felt harder and the glaser was easier to bounce. The drive for the downward rotation on the back side is easier to do with the glaser if you hit it lightly. However, I think that the g1 is sharper and faster for people with power. result. If you are not confident in your power, I think that using the Glaser will be very stable. Also, it is more stable to use it on the back side than on the fore side. I think g1 is better for those who are confident in power.
All Speed Spin Control Hardness Soft
Racket recommended use Tomokazu Harimoto Innerforce ALC
-
-
-
strained bean paste (Experience:2〜3 years) A powerful drive can be stably produced!
-
Serve → Rosena takes quite a while
Counter → A ball that is powerful just by hitting it
Draws an arc and fits in the court!Drive → ・Not greatly influenced by the rotation of the opponent
The ball rises, and you can aim at the course
was able to
・Speedy, powerful drive
It seemed difficult for the other party to take it.
・More power than loop drive
Drive is better
Speed → A little faster than Rosena in the middle
And the arc is high, so there is elongation
Occasionally make over mistakes
There is
lastly
If you swing through the drive with all your might
Believe in the rubber because you will miss
Stopping at about the face will enter cleanly!
You can hit a drive with enough power!
In addition, the drive in the middle and apse is full of power
Even if you shake it, it will fit neatly on the table!
I recommend putting it on the fore.
It is also recommended as a step up for Rosena.
Please try it \(^o^)/
Sorry for the long sentence.All Speed Spin Control Hardness Little hard
Racket recommended use TIMO BOLL CAF
-
-
-
Country salt (Experience:6〜10 years) Good rubber with no habit
-
I've been using the Evolution for many years, so I thought it would be slow to get used to it, but it was so easy to use that I could get used to it on the day I used it. It feels like a well-balanced rubber that can do anything rather than a super good god rubber with high performance. I felt that the ball was not so heavy from the opponent, although it was perfect when I hit it myself. Rotation is not so much compared to Tenergy, so people who are competing with the weight of the ball may be unsatisfactory
All Speed Spin Control Hardness Little hard
Racket recommended use QUARTET AFC
-
-
-
Gengar (Experience:6〜10 years) good rubber
-
Extra thick 45.2g inner force
The impression is not much different from Tenergy 80.
All the techniques are easy to do and stable, but I felt like Rakza 7 or Ventus Extra with a beautiful ball with overall round performance.
Also, although it is strong in upper rotation, the loop drive for lower rotation is surprisingly not rotated. So if you don't hit the lower rotation thickly and put it low, it will be easily countered.
Therefore, it will be in the form of taking a course and taking points.
I think that it is good for people who use heavy rackets because the rubber is light.
Otherwise, I think that Evolution MXP and V20 will have more rotation and speed in the same price range including discount.All Speed Spin Control Hardness Little hard
Racket recommended use Innerforce Layer ALC
-
-
-
wing zero (Experience:11〜20 years) Comparison with Tenergy 19
-
It will be compared with Tenergy 19.
Amount of rotation
Tenergy >> Glaserspeed
Tenergy GrazerMaximum ball power
TENERGY>>>>GRASERFeeling good when hitting the ball
Tenergy >>>>> Unsurmountable Wall >>>>> Grazersense of stability
Tenergy << GlaserEase of drawing out rubber performance
Tenergy <<<< Glasertolerance
Tenergy <<<< GlaserOverall
I think Tenergy is betterThe feeling of hitting a good ball by yourself is not as good as Tenaji.
The recipient also says that tenergy is coming
It seems that the Glaser is going when you shake it with a light force.Considering my age, my physical strength will begin to decline in the future.
Grazer and Tenergy, at a level that makes you wonder which one to use in the future
I think it's amazing to be around 5000 yen with this discount.All Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Racket recommended use Innerforce Layer ALC
-
Related rubber
Rubber
Producer
Type
Racket
Producer
Grip
Review Ranking
-
Get the Amazon gift card at a Review!
20 points are added in the post. You can replace it by Amazon Gift Card worth $5.00 with 1000 points.