GLAYZER

Everyone's rating [Hardness] Medium hardness
[Performance] Control and Spin to have excellent
GLAYZER
GLAYZER GLAYZER

(Click to zoom the photo)

Averages reviews points

  • Rating: 8.97 / 10
  • 30 reviews
    • Speed:8.37
    • Spin:8.43
    • Control:8.8

    Reviews of GLAYZER. Players who use Rubber evaluate various points such as hardness of the sponge, speed, control, spin, and feel at impact thoroughly.(Page 3)

    • Pimples in

    Specifications

    Price
    5,500 Yen(Include tax 6,050 Yen)
    Producer
    Butterfly
    Product code
    06100

    Reviews by user

    • visitor

      i just like table tennis (Experience:4〜5 years) The Royal Rubber

      Reviews by user

      I pasted it on the fore. The speed was decent, and the rotation and control were good.
      Speaking of greed, I wanted a little more performance of the counter.
      However, from a junior high school student's point of view, this cost performance is very appreciated with this performance.

      See original review

      2023/05/03
      All
      9/10
      Speed
      8
      Spin
      9
      Control
      10
      Hardness Soft

      Racket recommended use OVTCHAROV Innerforce ALC

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      Great Satan (Experience:4〜5 years) Good (^∀^)

      Reviews by user

      I was interested in whether it was an enhanced version of Rosena, so I purchased it.
      It was a rubber that I expected because it was a rubber that bounces more than Rosena and rotates more than Rosena. I think that it will be easier to use when combined with a wood racket or an inner racket. The sponge is harder than Rosena, so you may find it a little difficult to use, but it doesn't bother me that much.
      Conclusion Good rubber! !

      See original review

      2023/04/25
      All
      9/10
      Speed
      9
      Spin
      10
      Control
      8
      Hardness Little hard

      Racket recommended use FORTIUS FT ver.D RE

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      G1 (Experience:4〜5 years) Comparison with G1

      Reviews by user

      A comparison with the G1. First of all, when I drove, the g1 was a sharper drive. Grazer, on the other hand, draws an arc and is stable, and the ball stretches when it hits. As for hardness, the g1 felt harder and the glaser was easier to bounce. The drive for the downward rotation on the back side is easier to do with the glaser if you hit it lightly. However, I think that the g1 is sharper and faster for people with power. result. If you are not confident in your power, I think that using the Glaser will be very stable. Also, it is more stable to use it on the back side than on the fore side. I think g1 is better for those who are confident in power.

      See original review

      2023/04/21
      All
      8/10
      Speed
      7
      Spin
      7
      Control
      8
      Hardness Soft

      Racket recommended use Tomokazu Harimoto Innerforce ALC

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      strained bean paste (Experience:2〜3 years) A powerful drive can be stably produced!

      Reviews by user

      Serve → Rosena takes quite a while

      Counter → A ball that is powerful just by hitting it
      Draws an arc and fits in the court!

      Drive → ・Not greatly influenced by the rotation of the opponent
              The ball rises, and you can aim at the course
      was able to
            ・Speedy, powerful drive
            It seemed difficult for the other party to take it.
            ・More power than loop drive
      Drive is better
      Speed → A little faster than Rosena in the middle
            And the arc is high, so there is elongation
           Occasionally make over mistakes
          There is
      lastly
      If you swing through the drive with all your might
      Believe in the rubber because you will miss
      Stopping at about the face will enter cleanly!
      You can hit a drive with enough power!
      In addition, the drive in the middle and apse is full of power
      Even if you shake it, it will fit neatly on the table!
      I recommend putting it on the fore.
      It is also recommended as a step up for Rosena.
      Please try it \(^o^)/
      Sorry for the long sentence.

            

      See original review

      2023/04/16
      All
      8/10
      Speed
      9
      Spin
      10
      Control
      8
      Hardness Little hard

      Racket recommended use TIMO BOLL CAF

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      Country salt (Experience:6〜10 years) Good rubber with no habit

      Reviews by user

      I've been using the Evolution for many years, so I thought it would be slow to get used to it, but it was so easy to use that I could get used to it on the day I used it. It feels like a well-balanced rubber that can do anything rather than a super good god rubber with high performance. I felt that the ball was not so heavy from the opponent, although it was perfect when I hit it myself. Rotation is not so much compared to Tenergy, so people who are competing with the weight of the ball may be unsatisfactory

      See original review

      2023/04/15
      All
      8/10
      Speed
      8
      Spin
      8
      Control
      9
      Hardness Little hard

      Racket recommended use QUARTET AFC

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • Gengar

      Gengar (Experience:6〜10 years) good rubber

      Reviews by user

      Extra thick 45.2g inner force
      The impression is not much different from Tenergy 80.
      All the techniques are easy to do and stable, but I felt like Rakza 7 or Ventus Extra with a beautiful ball with overall round performance.
      Also, although it is strong in upper rotation, the loop drive for lower rotation is surprisingly not rotated. So if you don't hit the lower rotation thickly and put it low, it will be easily countered.
      Therefore, it will be in the form of taking a course and taking points.
      I think that it is good for people who use heavy rackets because the rubber is light.
      Otherwise, I think that Evolution MXP and V20 will have more rotation and speed in the same price range including discount.

      See original review

      2023/04/09
      All
      8/10
      Speed
      8
      Spin
      7
      Control
      8
      Hardness Little hard

      Racket recommended use Innerforce Layer ALC

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • wing zero

      wing zero (Experience:11〜20 years) Comparison with Tenergy 19

      Reviews by user

      It will be compared with Tenergy 19.

      Amount of rotation
      Tenergy >> Glaser

      speed
      Tenergy Grazer

      Maximum ball power
      TENERGY>>>>GRASER

      Feeling good when hitting the ball
      Tenergy >>>>> Unsurmountable Wall >>>>> Grazer

      sense of stability
      Tenergy << Glaser

      Ease of drawing out rubber performance
      Tenergy <<<< Glaser

      tolerance
      Tenergy <<<< Glaser

      Overall
      I think Tenergy is better

      The feeling of hitting a good ball by yourself is not as good as Tenaji.
      The recipient also says that tenergy is coming
      It seems that the Glaser is going when you shake it with a light force.

      Considering my age, my physical strength will begin to decline in the future.
      Grazer and Tenergy, at a level that makes you wonder which one to use in the future
      I think it's amazing to be around 5000 yen with this discount.

      See original review

      2023/04/06
      All
      10/10
      Speed
      9
      Spin
      8
      Control
      10
      Hardness Little soft

      Racket recommended use Innerforce Layer ALC

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    1. < Previous
    2. 1
    3. 2
    4. 3
    5. 4
    6. 5
    7. Next >
    Post a review

    Top Players

    Country

    Style

    Welcome to the table tennis Navi!

    Sign up!