Q power
| Everyone's rating |
[Hardness] Hard [Performance] Speed and Spin to have excellent |
(Click to zoom the photo)
Averages reviews points
- Speed:8.93
- Spin:8.27
- Control:7.07
-
Reviews of Q power. Players who use Rubber evaluate various points such as hardness of the sponge, speed, control, spin, and feel at impact thoroughly.(Page 2)
- Pimples in
Specifications
- Producer
- Mizuno
- Product code
- 83JRTA9809,83JRTA9862
Reviews by user
-
-
mountain river （Experience：６〜１０ years）
-
2023/10/17
It's a little light, probably because it's Japanese rubber. It's obvious when compared to Lazanter. It's better to hit the ball by hitting it than by rubbing it.
All Speed Spin Control Hardness Hard
Racket recommended use LIN Gaoyuan ALC
-
-
-
Lunch walnut （Experience：６〜１０ years）
-
2023/10/15
It's a strange rubber that gives off power but doesn't fly very far. It takes some rotation, but it often fits on the stand. Is it my arm? For now, I want to know if it's someone else.
All Speed Spin Control Hardness Hard
Racket recommended use QUARTET LFC
-
-
-
stoker （Experience：６〜１０ years）
-
2023/10/13
It literally feels like the focus is on power. The fore was easy to use. Although the rubber is light, it is easy to handle and can withstand the opponent's power.
All Speed Spin Control Hardness Hard
Racket recommended use AN JAEHYUN TMX i
-
-
-
Naora （Experience：６〜１０ years）
-
2023/10/13
It has the most power among Mizuno's rubbers. I don't even notice the unique smell of Q3, Q4, and Q5. Easy to rotate.
All Speed Spin Control Hardness Hard
Racket recommended use Forutiusu FT
-
-
-
mine （Experience：１１〜２０ years） It didn't suit me
-
2023/10/09
I felt that it was far away from Tenergy and Dignics.
It is comparable to Tenergy in terms of power alone, but the drawback is that it is very difficult to play on the table.All Speed Spin Control Hardness Little hard
-
-
-
Clear blank （Experience：１１〜２０ years） First impression
-
2023/10/07
I used it for the first time today.
I think it's pretty good. I went from Q4 to Q5 to QQ (I also tried using Q1 as a bag).
In the test video, famous people said that the ax has great bounce, so I decided to try the 1.9mm.
However, it didn't take off as much as I expected. No, it has enough momentum. I just didn't feel it was as bouncy as the video said (preconceptions? Also, is there a difference between a 5-ply plywood racket and a carbon racket?).I wonder what it is...I guess it's better to say that the performance of the QQ has been greatly improved, or that the sharp parts of the Q5 have been removed, but the speed and rotation are actually perfect. ! I was able to easily get into the opponent's court even if I rubbed or bumped it. The Q5 was like a wild horse, and I had to put all my energy into it in order to get it to the platform, but the QPower seemed to be able to get in if I swung properly.
I would like to use it for a while.
All Speed Spin Control Hardness Little hard
Racket recommended use ALTIUS ST5
-
-
-
Chinen （Experience：１１〜２０ years） You have to change the way you hit it compared to conventional rubber.
-
2023/10/07
Although the sponge is hard, the feel of the shot is soft (so I chose semi-hard for the hardness), and the ball rises upwards (doesn't fall toward you), so unless you hit it in the overlapping area, it will fly off the table. On the other hand, if you can create the angle of the racket, it will hit the opponent's court with a fairly low trajectory, so I think there is almost no chance of it being hit back on the counter. It enters by crawling that low. It also gives you speed. I felt that hitting with a stronger impact was more appropriate than rubbing. If you are a front/middle team or a fast attack type, it might be worth trying. It's a very interesting rubber.
All Speed Spin Control Hardness Little hard
Racket recommended use Spin ace carbon
-
Related rubber
Rubber
Producer
Type
Racket
Producer
Grip
Review Ranking
-
Get the Amazon gift card at a Review!
20 points are added in the post. You can replace it by Amazon Gift Card worth $5.00 with 1000 points.
