NO.1 table tennis review site

Reviews by user

• 

  Lunch Kurumi (Experience: ６〜１０ years)

  

  It's got power, but it's a weird rubber that doesn't really fly much. It spins, but the ball often stays on the table. Is it just my skill level? Either way, I'd like to know how it works out for other people.

  See original review Hide original review

  威力は出るけど、あまり飛ばないて感じの変なラバー。回転はかかるけど、台に収まることが多い。自分の腕なのかな？とりあえず、他の人だとどうか知りたい。

  2023/10/15

  All	8/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	10
  Control	8
  Hardness	Hard

  Racket recommended use QUARTET LFC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  mikuru Not really recommended

  

  It has power and decent spin, but the control is really difficult.
  Fastarc G-1 and V20 were easier to handle, so I went back to those.

  See original review Hide original review

  威力があって回転はそこそこかかるが、なにせコントロールが難しい。
  ファスタークG-1とV20のほうが扱いやすかったので戻しました。

  2023/10/13

  All	5/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	7
  Control	6
  Hardness	Little hard

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  Hinote (Experience: ６〜１０ years)

  

  Literally power-focused, just like the name suggests. It was easy to use on my forehand. The rubber itself is light, but it's still easy enough to handle that it doesn't lose out to the opponent's power.

  See original review Hide original review

  文字通りパワー重視という感じ。フォアが使いやすかった。ラバーは軽いが相手の威力に負けないぐらい扱いやすい。

  2023/10/13

  All	10/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	10
  Control	8
  Hardness	Hard

  Racket recommended use AN JAEHYUN TMX i

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  Naora (Experience: ６〜１０ years)

  

  The most powerful rubber in Mizuno's lineup. It doesn't have that strong smell that's typical of Q3, Q4, and Q5. Easy to put spin on.

  See original review Hide original review

  ミズノのラバーの中で1番威力が出る。Q3やQ4、Q5特有の匂いもそこまで感じない。回転はかけやすい。

  2023/10/13

  All	10/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	10
  Control	8
  Hardness	Hard

  Racket recommended use Forutiusu FT

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  minku (Experience: １１〜２０ years) Didn't suit me

  

  I felt it's nowhere near Tenergy or Dignics.
  Power-wise alone it's comparable to Tenergy, but the short game is really hard to play with it - that's the downside.

  See original review Hide original review

  テナジーやディグニクスには遠く及ばないと感じた。
  威力だけならテナジーに匹敵するが、台上プレーなどが非常にやりづらいのが難点です。

  2023/10/09

  All	4/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	5
  Control	6
  Hardness	Little hard

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

• 

  Ending the long break (Experience: １１〜２０ years) First impressions

  

  Used it for the first time today.
  I think it's pretty good. I went through Q4 → Q5 → QQ (also tried Q1 on my backhand for a bit).
  Some well-known players in test-hit videos said it flies really well, so I went with 1.9mm.
  But it didn't fly as much as I expected. Well, it has plenty of speed - it just didn't feel as explosive as the videos made it sound (maybe I built it up in my head? Or maybe it's the difference between a 5-ply blade and a carbon blade?).

  How should I put it... maybe QQ got a really nice performance boost, or the sharp edge of Q5 got smoothed out while keeping the speed and spin fully intact? Whether I brushed it or hit through it, the ball went in easily. Q5 felt like a wild horse - every single ball needed full commitment to stay on the table - but with QPower, as long as I swing properly, it goes in.

  I want to keep using it for a while and see how it goes.

  See original review Hide original review

  本日、初めて使いました。
  かなり良いと思います。Q4→Q5→QQと渡り歩きました（Q1もお試しでバックに使ってみました）。
  試打動画でおの有名な方々もすごく弾むと言っていたので、1.9mmにしてみました。
  が、思いのほか弾みませんでした。いや、十分な弾みは持っています。動画で言われていたほどすごく弾むと感じなかっただけです（先入観？　あと、5枚合板とカーボンラケットの違いでしょうか？）。

  なんだろう・・・、QQをすごくうまく性能UPさせたというべきか、Q5の尖った部分を消し、しかしスピード、回転は実は申し分なく出ている性能にしたというと良いのかな？！　こすってもぶつけても簡単に相手コートに入れることができました。Q5って、あばれ馬という感じで、全球気合を入れないと台に収まらなかったけど、QPowerはきちんと振れていれば入ってくれるという感じでした。

  しばらく使い込んでみたいと思います。

  2023/10/07

  All	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use ALTIUS ST5

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  Chinen (Experience: １１〜２０ years) You'll need to change your stroke from conventional rubbers

  

  Even though the sponge is on the harder side, the feel is actually soft (that's why I went with the semi-hard hardness). The ball tends to fly upward a lot (it doesn't drop short), so unless you close your racket angle quite a bit, it'll fly off the end of the table. On the other hand, once you get the angle right, it comes in with a really low trajectory that dives into the opponent's court, so it's rarely countered back. It comes in that low, almost skimming the table. It's fast too. I felt like a firmer impact-style stroke suits it better than brushing the ball. It seems worth trying for close-to-the-table/mid-distance, fast-attack type players. It's a pretty interesting rubber.

  See original review Hide original review

  スポンジは硬めという割に打球感は柔らかく（なので硬度はセミハードを選択しました）、ボールがとにかく上に上がる（手前に落ちない）ので、かなり被せ目に打たないと台から飛び出します。その代わり、ラケットの角度さえ作れればかなり低い弾道で相手コートへ突き刺さりますので、カウンターで打ち返されることはほとんどないと思います。そのくらい低く這うように入ります。また、スピードも出ます。擦るよりは強めにインパクトする打ち方の方が合っているような気がしました。前/中陣、速攻タイプの方は使ってみる価値がありそうです。なかなか面白いラバーですよ。

  2023/10/07

  All	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	8
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use Spin ace carbon

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. Next >

Related rubber

• 
  Q QUALITY
• 
  Q1
• 
  Booster EV
• 
  Booster HP