Q QUALITY

Everyone's rating [Hardness] Little soft
[Performance] Control and Spin to have excellent
Q QUALITY

(Click to zoom the photo)

Averages reviews points

  • Rating: 8.97 / 10
  • 33 reviews
    • Speed:7.94
    • Spin:8.76
    • Control:9.15

    Reviews of Q QUALITY. Players who use Rubber evaluate various points such as hardness of the sponge, speed, control, spin, and feel at impact thoroughly.

    • Pimples in

    Specifications

    Price
    5,900 Yen(Include tax 6,490 Yen)
    Producer
    Mizuno
    Product code
    83JRT299

    Players use Q QUALITY

    Reviews by user

    • The

      The (Experience:11〜20 years) Cost performance [10]

      Reviews by user

      It is a comparison with the usual dig 05.
      It's chewy including the sheet, but it's not weak. Is it a softening of MX-P?
      The impact of using Tenergy for the first time gives a feeling of automatic transmission and the quality of the block is high.
      The drive is easy to rotate, and it feels like the force is transmitted without waste and it flies. It seems that stick balls will not come out first. Since the pop-out comes out, the arc line is stable, so it goes in a little shallower.
      I don't think there's anything wrong with it, but I think some people aren't good at not feeling it.
      Although it is unsatisfactory in terms of power from Dig 05, I think it is not inferior to Tenergy 05.

      See original review

      2021/12/21
      All
      9/10
      Speed
      8
      Spin
      9
      Control
      9
      Hardness Little soft

      Racket recommended use VISCARIA

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • Pen Meat

      Pen Meat (Experience:6〜10 years) Ease of increasing the bottom rotation

      Reviews by user

      1.9mm is used on the back of KIRIN K5. I heard that the specifications have changed from the initial lot, so I tried it for the first time in a while. The weight is 51 grams with a solid paste, which is quite heavy for its thickness. It is a negative point to use it on the back of a pen. Previously, I had the impression that it would spin a lot when I swung it firmly, but to be honest, it's normal. It's not that it doesn't spin, but I would like it to have a little more spin at this price range. However, it seems that it is easy to do underspin and it is easy to lift both back drives and chiquitas. It is not an auto rubber, so if you apply it firmly, it will settle properly. Even when the third ball's push comes up in the air, you can hit it without being affected much. It is not a rubber that is specialized for anything, but it has a lot of spin among rubbers with insensitivity, so as long as the weight is light...

      See original review

      2025/02/16
      All
      8/10
      Speed
      8
      Spin
      7
      Control
      9
      Hardness Little hard
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • Sato

      Sato (Experience:11〜20 years) Affordable and versatile

      Reviews by user

      I tried it on both the forehand and backhand. I thought it would be good for the backhand because it's on the soft side, but I had some problems with the push, probably due to the direction of the shot, so I ended up using it for the farhand.

      Apart from the aforementioned tendency for the push to float, this rubber has few drawbacks and is easy to use for all techniques.

      It is a clear strength that even with this softness, it is stable for topspin returns and strong backspin hits.

      I think it may be too soft for strong hitters, so I would recommend it for the forehand side of junior high and high school students, women, and seniors.

      Compared to Tenergy, the sheet lasts much longer, so I also recommend it in terms of cost performance.

      See original review

      2025/02/07
      All
      9/10
      Speed
      7
      Spin
      7
      Control
      8
      Hardness Little soft

      Racket recommended use LIBERTA SOLID Pro

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • Waon

      Waon Basically a rubber with rounded performance for driving. Counter ◎ Block ○

      Reviews by user

      The purchase price is pretty reasonable.

      I've used it both before and after the supply was stopped. This time, I'll talk about the current specification after the supply was stopped.

      I think it's a rubber that doesn't have any obvious flaws, but doesn't have much of a unique character that sets it apart from others. To put it negatively, it's mediocre, but to put it positively, it's versatile.

      However, the counter is clearly good. I hit the ball with a fast tempo and slam it down, but it goes in really easily. I wonder if it has a strong ability to take the ball? The block is also pretty good. On the table, it was a rubber with a very strong habit of pushing and stopping, but since it was reproduced, it's not like that anymore. Average.

      I think that when it was first released, it was described in various places as a rubber for backhand, but I feel that it's more for forehand. It is on the soft side, so please use it for forehands who like soft rubber. It is a rubber that is based on drive, so I'm not sure if it's good to use it on the backhand just because it's soft.

      The drawback is the price. When you order online, there are many other high-end rubbers to choose from.

      See original review

      2024/11/21
      All
      8/10
      Speed
      7
      Spin
      8
      Control
      6
      Hardness Little soft

      Racket recommended use LUDEACK

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      Masamune (Experience:6〜10 years) Well-balanced rubber

      Reviews by user

      Anyway, it's an all-round rubber with no obvious flaws!

      The shots may float a little, but the power of the drive is greater and it goes up!

      It's also very durable, so I think it's very good value for money.

      See original review

      2024/07/13
      All
      9/10
      Speed
      9
      Spin
      9
      Control
      8
      Hardness Little soft

      Racket recommended use AA

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • katsuo000_2

      katsuo000_2 (Experience:More than 20 years) Tenergy with the best cost performance!

      Reviews by user

      2.1 mm, red.
      67 g → 48 g
      Shore C hardness 40.3° measured from the seat
      D05: 48g, 50.0°
      T05: 47g, 44.6°
      1. Good bite like Tenergy!
      2. Sufficient spin and ball holding in an easy-to-use rubber
      3. Tenergy with the best cost performance
      What I particularly like is the good ball holding. While the slightly older German rubbers and Dignics series rubbers are becoming rubbers that are somewhat difficult to feel ball holding because of their high performance, I think that a rubber that is high performance and has a strong ball holding will be a rubber that will appeal to those who like it. By holding the ball, I think you can swing any technique with confidence.
      I have also reviewed it at https://katsuo000.com/, so please refer to it.

      See original review

      2024/06/07
      All
      7/10
      Speed
      8
      Spin
      7
      Control
      9
      Hardness Little hard

      Racket recommended use EC-11

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • a

      a

      Reviews by user

      Perhaps because the seat was good, I couldn't get it to dig in and it fell off, or I over-missed it. Recommended for players who are good at applying rotation.

      See original review

      2024/01/27
      All
      9/10
      Speed
      9
      Spin
      9
      Control
      9
      Hardness Little hard
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    1. 1
    2. 2
    3. 3
    4. 4
    5. 5
    Post a review

    Top Players

    Country

    Style

    Welcome to the table tennis Navi!

    Sign up!