NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  X-Tend

  

  I use this on the backhand side of my penhold blade.

  The ball sinks in nicely and it generates a fair amount of spin. It doesn't have much grip on its own, but on the flip side, it's less affected by the opponent's spin.

  Because of that, drive receives and chiquitas are stable. That's honestly the best part.

  It's also lightweight. Even with a Chinese rubber on the forehand side, the weight balance doesn't bother me.

  I don't really have any complaints, though at an advanced level you might find the spin and speed a bit lacking.

  People often say the lifespan is short, and while it's true the rubber chips fairly easily, I don't feel like the actual performance degrades that quickly.

  See original review Hide original review

  ペンの裏面に使用しています。

  食い込みがよく、回転もそれなりにかかります。グリップ力はさほどありませんが、反面、相手の回転の影響を受けづらいです。

  それゆえに、ドライブレシーブやチキータが安定します。とにかくこれがうれしいです。

  また、軽いです。表面に中国ラバーを貼っても気になりません。

  欠点は特にありませんが、上級者レベルになるとスピンやスピードが物足りなく感じるかもしれません。

  それと寿命が短いなんてよく言われてますが、確かにラバーが欠けやすいものも、性能自体はそれほど劣化しやすいようには感じません。

  2016/11/06

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	3
  Spin	6
  Control	9
  Hardness	Soft

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  13

• 

  ALLROUND EVOLUTION

  

  For a "classic" blade, this one seems like it'll split opinion.

  First, the feel: it vibrates a lot in your hand. Even more so if you put on OX rubber.

  Also, the handle is thick. You can grip it firmly, but switching to a short (stop) is hard. If you want to do a lot of short game work, you might need to sand down the handle.

  Also, despite being called all-round, it's fairly heavy, and it bounces about as much as an offensive 5-ply blade. Of course, the control is wonderful too.

  It seems well suited to two-winged players who handle their backhand with inverted rubber, but I don't feel it suits penhold pips players very well.

  Lastly: if you peel the rubber off carelessly, the wood surface can come off with it, so be careful (T_T)

  See original review Hide original review

  定番というわりに好き嫌いが分かれそうなラケットです。

  まず打球感ですが、とても手に響きます。一枚ラバーなんか貼るとなおさらです。

  それと、グリップが太いです。がっちり握れる反面、ショートへの切り替えが難しいです。ショートであれこれしようという人はグリップを削らないといけないかもしれません。

  またオールラウンドというわりに重量がそれなりにあり、攻撃用5枚合板と同じくらい弾みます。もちろんコントロールも素晴らしいです。

  バックを裏面でさばく両ハンド型には向いてそうですが、ペン粒にはあまり向いてない気がします。

  最後に。適当にラバーはがすと板まではがれるから気を付けて(泣)

  2016/11/06

  Overall	5/10
  Speed	5
  Spin	5
  Control	7
  Touch	5
  Hardness	Little soft

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  12

• 

  Tenergy 80-FX

  

  If you're moving from a normal tension rubber like Roundell to a spin-oriented tension rubber, this is probably the best choice. Honestly, when hitting close to the table, I don't feel much difference from Roundell.

  But when you take a step back, add spin, and really send the ball flying, you're blown away by the difference from Roundell in every respect — spin, speed, distance, you name it. It's enough to make you feel like you got better just from changing rubbers.

  That said, since it's soft, you lose power easily when you hit with a strong impact. It's not suited to the forehand of a player with a lot of power.

  Also, it's a rubber that sinks the ball in and sends it flying on its own, so serves and receives are difficult.

  See original review Hide original review

  ラウンデルのようなノーマルテンションからスピン系テンションに移行するなら、多分このラバーが一番いい。正直、前陣で打つ分にはラウンデルとの差を感じない。

  一歩下がって、回転をかけて飛ばすとスピン・スピード・飛距離などあらゆるポイントでラウンデルとの違いに感動する。ラバーを変えただけで自分が上手くなった錯覚するぐらい。

  ただ、柔らかいので強いインパクトで打つとパワーがロスしやすい。パワーがある選手のフォアには向かない。

  また、勝手に食い込んで勝手に飛ぶラバーなのでサーブ・レシーブが難しい。

  2017/04/04

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	8
  Control	7
  Hardness	Soft

  Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ZLC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  11

• 

  Roundell

  

  Honestly, I didn't expect it to perform this well.

  People call it a control-oriented rubber, but that's only compared to the spin-oriented tension rubbers the top players use. Compared to older tension rubbers like Bryce or Moristo, it's clearly ahead in both spin and speed.

  On top of that, it's not very sensitive to incoming spin, so your receives stay stable too.

  It's also a lighter rubber, which keeps your swing stable, and the topsheet is tough enough that it doesn't chip easily even if you catch the edge of the table.

  For beginner to intermediate players, this is the kind of rubber that makes me want to say: don't bother reaching for a spin-oriented tension rubber you can't handle yet — just use Roundell instead.

  See original review Hide original review

  正直、ここまで高性能なラバーだとは思いませんでした。

  コントロール重視のラバーといわれていますが、それはあくまでトップ選手が使うスピン系テンションに比べての話です。ブライスやモリストなど従来のテンションラバーに比べるとスピンもスピードも断然上です。

  それでいて、回転の影響を受けづらいラバーなのでレシーブも安定します。

  また軽めのラバーであるためスイングが安定し、シートが丈夫であるため台にぶつけても欠けづらいです。

  初・中級者レベルなら、下手にスピン系テンションに手を出すよりラウンデル使った方がいいよ、と言いたくなるようなラバーです。

  2016/12/31

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	5
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Innerforce Layer · ZLC-CS

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  8

• 

  MARK V HPS

  

  I was surprised when I hit with it using the same feel as a Mark V. It bounces enough to feel like a completely different rubber.

  Even so, the trajectory is almost the same as the Mark V, so it's fantastic paired with a springy 5-ply blade. The arc is just gorgeous.

  It also doesn't have that typical tension-rubber sensation of the ball sinking in and flying off on its own, so your finer techniques stay stable.

  The downside is that the spin feels a bit lacking.

  The grip on the ball stays about the same level as the Mark V, but with the plastic ball, the spin feels a little weaker.

  If this were still the celluloid ball era, it might have been a rubber I'd have wanted to keep using...

  See original review Hide original review

  マークVと同じ感覚で打ったらビックリしました。別物と感じるぐらい弾みます。

  それでいて弾道はマークVとほぼ同じなので、よくしなる5枚合板と合わせると最高です。弧線にほれぼれします。

  またテンション特有の勝手に食い込んでとんでいく感覚がないので、細かい技術も安定します。

  欠点はスピンが物足りないこと。

  マークVと同じくらいのグリップ力は保たれていますが、プラボールだとちょっと回転力が弱く感じます。

  セルボールの時代だったら、使い続けたいと思えるラバーだったかもしれません…

  2016/11/06

  Overall	6/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	4
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket Violin C

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  8

1. 1
2. 2
3. 3
4. Next >