NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  Q5

  

  Compared to Tenergy 05, I get the sense that the ball leaves the racket on an incredible arc right from the rally stage. It feels like it shoots upward the instant it touches the sheet. So I felt this is a pretty different animal from Tenergy. I think 05 is also positioned as a spin-oriented tension rubber, but this one felt like it had even more spin.
  Drives... the spin on loop drives is ridiculous. It's on par with or better than Evolution MX-P, and even though I'm the type who brushes the ball to generate spin, I get a nice clean arc without any trouble. That said, if you don't hit it properly, it's a hard rubber, so the ball will fly straight into the net.
  Playing back from the table... the speed isn't as much as I expected (though this isn't a fair comparison since I'm measuring against Tenergy 05), but I think anyone with enough strength and practice can cover that gap with technique.
  Short game... pushes and chiquitas both go smoothly. It's supposed to be hard, but the feel wasn't as hard as I expected.

  For someone who attacks with heavy spin and has enough skill to back it up, I think Q5, G1, and MX-P are the ones I'd recommend!

  See original review Hide original review

  テナジー０５と比べ、ラリーの段階で打ちだしがものすごい弧線を描く感覚があります。面に当たった瞬間上に飛び出す感じです。なので、テナジーとはかなり別物だと感じました。０５も回転系テンションの位置づけだと思いますが、もっと回転量が多く感じました。
  ドライブ…ループの回転量はえげつないです。エボリューションＭＸ－Ｐと同等かそれ以上で、自分はこすって掛けるタイプですが、難なくきれいな弧線を描きます。ただし、しっかり打てないと硬いﾗﾊﾞーなので、ネットに一直線に飛んでしまいます。
  後陣…スピードは思ったほどは出ないです（テナジー０５との比較なので当てにはなりませんが）が、筋力や練習量が十分な人は技術で十分カバーできる範囲だと思います。
  台上…ツッツキ、チキータも難なく打てます。硬いはずなんですが、打球感はそこまで硬く感じませんでした。

  ゴリゴリ回転で攻めていくタイプの人で、十分な実力がある方には、Ｑ５、Ｇ１，ＭＸ－Ｐあたりがおすすめになるのかなと思います！

  2020/01/05

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Hardness	Hard

  Recomend racket Zhang Jike ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  5

• 

  Evolution MX-P

  

  I switched over from Tenergy 80.
  The speed felt like it dropped off a touch, but the spin clearly went up. As a spin-oriented tension rubber, true to its name, I felt it was excellent. The bounce is plenty, the feel on contact is soft for its hardness, the grip on the ball is good, and it grips exactly the way you'd expect. Balls going out has clearly gone down — shots draw an arc and land on the table more often now.
  For players who aren't the type to attack hard with speed but instead like to build up spin, connect with topspin rallies, and then finish off the chance when it comes, I think this is a fantastic rubber.

  See original review Hide original review

  テナジー８０から張り替えました。
  スピードは気持ち落ちた気がしましたが、回転は明らかに増したと思います。タイトル通りの回転系テンションラバーとしてとても優秀だと感じました。弾みも十分で、硬度の割に柔らかい打球感で、球持ちが良く、思った通りに引っ掛かるという印象です。明らかにアウトが減り、弧線を描いて、台に収まる回数が増えました。
  スピードでバシバシ攻めていくタイプでなく、しっかりと回転を掛けてドライブでつないで、チャンスを打ち抜くタイプの人には素晴らしいラバーだと思います。

  2019/01/09

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	9
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  5

• 

  ROZENA

  

  I switched from Tenergy 64FX for backhand use.
  It can do just about anything, and it's stable. Since I switched from a 64, the speed is obviously noticeably lower, but it's still more than enough. For backhand receives, I mostly go with a full topspin drive or a chiquita, and especially with chiquita, the ball lands on the table much more often now. (Of course, part of that is just my own lack of skill with the 64.) It feels a little short on initial speed for close-to-the-table quick attacks on the backhand, but I think it suits a topspin drive player who relies heavily on drives and chiquitas. Honestly, I feel like this might be it for my backhand.
  The price also seems to be gradually coming down, so I think it's great for anyone attacking with backhand drives, or anyone who wants a rubber that can handle everything on the forehand.

  See original review Hide original review

  バックハンド使用で、テナジー６４ＦＸから張り替えました。
  とにかくなんでもできて、安定感があります。６４からの張り替えなので、さすがにスピードは明らかに落ちていますが、それでも必要十分。バックでもレシーブは、がっつりドライブかチキータを多用するので、特にチキータは台に収まることが多くなりました。（もちろん私が６４を扱えないという技術不足はありますが）前陣速攻のバックには、初速が足りない気がしますが、ドライブ・チキータを多用するドライブマンには合っていると思います。正直、バックはこれで決まりかなとも思います。
  価格も少しずつ下がってきているみたいなので、バックハンドドライブでも攻めていく人や、フォアでなんでもこなしたい人には素晴らしいと思います。

  2019/01/09

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  3

• 

  Tenergy 64 FX

  

  I used this on the backhand as a replacement for Vega Asia DF.
  It flies a lot, so blocking is really easy. Being the FX version, it's softer and I expected it to be easy to handle, but Vega Asia DF was still much easier to control overall. Part of this is that my own backhand technique isn't great, but even with backhand hitting, I kept sending balls long at first (because it flies so much), and drives were a real struggle. That said, when I could commit fully and swing through — like on a chiquita — I could feel balls going in that wouldn't have gone in before. So both spin and speed are excellent. But on balls where I couldn't commit and just tapped nervously, it basically never went in. Just block it and it goes in the net; swing a little and it flies out. That's the feel of it. I think it's a great rubber if you have the technique to handle it, but I really felt it's for advanced players. This is a rubber for national-level players, or those aiming for that level. Next, I'm thinking of trying something like Rozena.

  See original review Hide original review

  ヴェガアジアDFの代わりにバックハンドで使用。
  すごく飛びます。なのでブロックはとてもやりやすいです。FXなので柔らかめで扱いやすいと思いますが、それでもヴェガアジアDFの方がずっと扱いやすさは上でした。自分のバックハンドの技術が未熟なのもありますが、バックのミート打ちでも最初はアウト連発（飛ぶので）、ドライブはかなり苦戦しました。ただ、チキータ等、思い切って振ることができれば、入らなかった球が入るような感覚はあります。なので、回転もスピードも◎でしょう。ただ、思い切って振れない球、ビビって当てただけなような球はことごとく入りません。当てるだけだとネット。すこし振るとアウト。という感じです。扱う技術さえあれば素晴らしいラバーだと思いますが、やはり上級者向けだと感じました。全国レベルの方や、全国を目指す方が手に取るラバーだと思います。自分は次はロゼナあたりを試そうと思っています。

  2017/08/17

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	8
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  3

• 

  Zhang Jike ALC

  

  Rallies/drives... the ball feels like it's really flying through.
  The short game... it can get a bit rough, I think, but it's a level you can fully adjust for with technique and rubber choice.
  Playing away from the table... since it's carbon, I don't think you'll lose out on power.

  That said, it's not really a "this is what an outer blade feels like" kind of blade — I think it depends a lot on the rubber. Compared to the Inner Force Layer ALC, I felt they were pretty similar. If anything, the feel here is a bit harder. Still, among outer carbon blades, it has a gentle feel, and there's almost none of that wild, uncontrollable flying sensation. I think it suits people making their debut with an outer blade, or people who want a blade with more carbon character than a 5-ply, but not overly wild.

  See original review Hide original review

  ラリー・ドライブ…玉が走る感じがあります。
  台上…少し荒れやすいかなと思いますが、技術やラバーで十分調整できるレベル
  後陣…カーボンなので、十分なパワーで負けないと思います。

  しかし「これぞアウター」という感じではなく、ラバーに結構左右されると思います。インナーフォースレイヤーＡＬＣと比較して、私はよく似ていると感じました。強いて言うなら、打感はこちらの方が硬いですね。ただ、アウターカーボンの中では優しい打感であり、ぶっ飛ぶじゃじゃ馬感はほとんどありません。アウターデビューの方や、５枚合板よりはカーボンらしさがあるので、そのあたりのラケットが欲しい方には合っていると思います。

  2020/01/05

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	10
  Control	9
  Touch	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber(Front) TENERGY 05

  Recommend rubber(Back) Q5

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. Next >