kabuto555's profile
![kabuto555's profile](https://tabletennis-reference.com/img/player.jpg)
Gender | Male |
---|---|
Experience | 4〜5 years |
User review
-
-
-
I had pitched Raguza 7 on the back of Timo Boll ALC. Advantages block is stable, easy to put a pace on poking, is where the control performance was high. The disadvantages are a convenient place fell to the back smash do to be struck to lift when you flick the serve of the other party. When you flick the serve of the other party I felt difficult spear No. 1. It is susceptible to the net.
This rubber is I think that it is up to people to use.Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little hard
Recomend racket Timo Boll ALC
-
-
-
-
It is easy to control. Fore, I think the chemistry on either of the back is good.
Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Recomend racket Maze Performance
-
-
-
-
Since the soft rubber thickness would be better to have the especially thick. Towards the fore than the back I thought that there is quite a sense of stability. 2 ball first attack is amazing stable. Shot feeling is soft.
Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Soft
Recomend racket Timo Boll ZLC
-
-
-
-
Yourself Have you used to back. Tenaji 64 than was stable. Is 2 ball first attack of the back was easy to do. However, it is the fast deterioration.
Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Recomend racket Timo Boll ZLC
-
-
-
-
Struck ball will be linear. So, I recommend a racket is Timo Boll ALC.
This rubber is a famous rubber you are using is Morizono players and Ito players and Ishikawa, but did not know honestly what is amazing. It is hard to understand features. Tenaji not clear like a.Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little hard
Recomend racket Timo Boll ALC
-
Racket
Producer
Grip
Review Ranking
Rubber
Producer
Type
-
Get the Amazon gift card at a Review!
20 points are added in the post. You can replace it by Amazon Gift Card worth $5.00 with 1000 points.