NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  Super Spinpips Chop II

  

  This is the long-awaited soft-sponge version of Spipi.
  Used the thin sheet on the backhand.

  The amount of spin on chops is honestly ridiculous. It bites like crazy.
  It's also easy to absorb the opponent's power shots, and you can freely control whether you put spin on it or not, and how fast or slow the ball travels —
  I think it's a fantastic rubber for chopping.

  That said, since I've played inverted-inverted for a long time, this is probably just my own lack of skill, but my pushes didn't bite as much as I'd like.
  Still, it's very easy to control the placement.

  My personal complaints were with attacking and blocking.
  When attacking, maybe because the sponge is too soft, the ball release feels a bit sluggish, so it's not the easiest to put shots away.
  As for blocking, it really wasn't stable — the ball dropped short a lot, which was pretty stressful.

  See original review Hide original review

  スピピの待望のソフトスポンジです。
  バック面で薄を使用。

  カットの回転量は本当に異常です。めちゃくちゃ切れます。
  相手の強打もおさえやすいですし、回転のかけるかけないや、球足の速い遅いを自在にコントロールでき、
  カット用として非常に優れたラバーだと思います。

  ただ、自分は裏裏歴が長いので単純に自分の技術不足なのですが、ツッツキはそこまで切れませんでした。
  でもコースのコントロールはとてもしやすい

  個人的な難点は攻撃とブロックでした。
  攻撃時はスポンジが柔らかすぎるからか球離れが少し悪い感じがして決してしやすいとはいえません。
  ブロックに関しては本当に安定せず、特に落ちることが多くストレスフルでした。

  2017/04/03

  Overall	5/10
  Speed	3
  Spin	8
  Control	5
  Hardness	Soft

  Recomend racket YUTO MURAMATSU

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  28

• 

  KOJI MATSUSHITA OFFENSIVE

  

  The first time I hit with it, I was surprised at just how much it bounces. It bounces more than some mediocre attacking blades.
  The hitting feel is quite hard, so opinions on it will probably be split.

  Its performance on attacking shots leaves nothing to be desired.
  Chopping was a struggle to control until I got used to it, but as long as I commit fully to my own swing, I get plenty of spin on it and can absorb the power of my opponent's shots.
  But if I'm caught off guard or end up just grazing the ball, it pops off way too far...
  Honestly, the bounce is more than I can personally handle.

  I wouldn't recommend this to beginner or lower-intermediate choppers, but for intermediate-and-above players whose style involves returning topspin drives a lot from mid-to-far distance, it might be a good fit.
  The top ply is hard, so it seems like it would pair really well with long pips on the backhand.

  See original review Hide original review

  まず打ってみてあまりの弾みに驚きました。下手な攻撃用ラケットより弾みます。
  打球感は結構ハードで、好みが分かれそうです。

  攻撃時の性能は申し分ありません。
  カットは慣れるまでコントロールに苦戦しましたが、しっかりと自分のスイングができる分には回転も充分かかり、相手の球威も吸収できます。
  とっさのときやちょっと当てる打ち方になってしまうとポーンっと飛んでいってしまいます、、
  正直自分には扱えない弾みです。

  カット初心者・中級者下のほうの方にはおすすめしませんが、中級者以上の方で中後陣からドライブをかけかえすことが多いプレースタイルの方にはいいかもしれません
  上板が硬いのでバック粒との相性はかなり良さそうですね

  2017/02/22

  Overall	6/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	7
  Control	3
  Touch	6
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber(Front) Vega Japan

  Recommend rubber(Back) Super Spinpips Chop II

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  26

• 

  YUTO MURAMATSU

  

  I normally use the Matsushita Offensive (93g). Everything below is basically a comparison with that.

  I got hold of a pretty light one at 87g.
  Given the weight difference, it feels quite different from the Matsushita, more than I expected.

  The feel on contact is softer, the bounce is toned down a bit, giving more stability.
  The grip is thicker than the Matsushita's, and personally it fit my hand perfectly.

  The balance point is closer to the grip than the Matsushita, so switching between shots is easier.
  On the other hand, the tip doesn't naturally rotate through the shot, so I feel like spin drops off a bit.
  Also, just like the Matsushita, depending on how you make contact it can suddenly fly off with a "pop," so you need to be careful.

  The balance between stability and the chop/attack balance is good, and I'm planning to keep using this one going forward.

  >Update
  After a week of use, since it's so light I sometimes had trouble generating spin or holding shots down, so
  I switched the forehand from VEGA Japan (2.0) to VS>401 (1.8).
  It went from 167g to 174g, which is still light for a chopping blade, but personally it's just right.
  Also, the "flies off on its own" feeling disappeared, and with the hardness now a bit firmer, it feels just right.
  Drives from far off the table are tough, but for everything else I think it's a pretty good match.

  See original review Hide original review

  普段松下オフェンシブ(93g)を使用。以下基本的に松下との比較です。

  かなり軽い87gのものを手に入れました。
  重量の関係もありますが、松下とは思ったより別物だなという印象です。

  打球感が柔らかく、弾みが少し抑えめになり安定感が増しています。
  松下よりグリップが太く個人的には手にぴったりでした。

  重心が松下よりグリップ寄りにあるため、切り返しがしやすい。
  代わりに先端が自然と回る感じはしないので、回転量は落ちる印象が。
  また、松下同様当て方によってポコーンと飛んでいってしまうので、注意が必要です。

  安定感やカットと攻撃のバランスが取れており、これからこちらを使用していこうと思います。

  >追記
  一週間使って、軽すぎるのか回転がかけにくかったり抑えが利かないことがあったので、
  フォアをVEGA JAPAN(2.0)⇒VS>401(1.8)に変更。
  167g⇒174gになり、カット用にしてはまだ軽いですが、個人的にはちょうどいい。
  また、勝手に飛んでいく感じが無くなり、硬さもちょい固めで丁度良く、いい感じになりました。
  後陣からのドライブはきついですが、他の技術に関してはかなり相性のいい組み合わせかと。

  2017/02/26

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	8
  Control	8
  Touch	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber(Front) VS＞401

  Recommend rubber(Back) Super Spinpips Chop II

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  24

• 

  Timo Boll ZLF

  

  I used this back in my inverted-rubber-on-both-sides topspin-drive days.

  It was a very well-balanced racket — slightly light, not too bouncy, and easy to generate spin on.
  Counter play close to the table in particular was really easy to do.

  Since it's an outer-ply blade, the feel is that of a special material, but if that doesn't bother you,
  it's a high-level racket I can broadly recommend to topspin players from intermediate to advanced.
  (That said, it doesn't fly off with that "boing" feeling like a normal carbon blade, so I'd really like wood-blade users to give it a try too.)

  See original review Hide original review

  裏裏ドライブ時代に使用。

  やや軽量、弾み過ぎない、回転もかけやすいというとてもバランスの取れたラケットでした。
  特に前陣でのカウンタープレーがすごくしやすかったです。

  アウターなので特殊素材の打球感ではありますが、そこに抵抗がない方であれば
  ドライブマンであれば中級～上級者まで幅広くおススメできるレベルの高い一本です。
  (とはいえ普通のカーボンのような、ポーンと飛んでしまう感じではないので、木材使用者だった方にも是非使ってみていただきたいです)

  2017/04/03

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	8
  Control	7
  Touch	6
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber(Front) Vega Asia

  Recommend rubber(Back) Omega IV Elite

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  22

• 

  Moristo DF

  

  First off, just looking at it, it really has that old-school tension rubber vibe - kind of nostalgic.
  If you forget to attach the included adhesive sheet, it curls up and you'll fail to apply it properly.

  I used the thin version on the backhand.

  The good points are how easy it is to put spin on and how hard that spin is to read.
  The maximum spin isn't as much as a tacky rubber or spin-tension rubber, but it's plenty (surprisingly so).
  Especially on the push, that feeling of the ball digging in and getting gripped feels great and gets addictive.
  It produces the trajectory typical of tension rubbers, and it's hard to tell apart from a knuckle chop.
  I think it'd be even better to put a tacky rubber on the other side to create more of a difference in ball quality.

  So I've written a lot of good things up to here, but I think it flies a bit too much to use on the backhand for chopping.
  No matter what, I just can't get used to that flying-away feeling.
  (And yet it's too soft and doesn't bounce enough for attacking)

  I actually have a better impression of it from using it on my forehand about 10 years ago in junior high.
  That said, for forehand use, I feel like these days there are better rubbers out there for the same price or cheaper, so I'm left wondering what the point of using this one even is...
  So that's why I gave it this rating.

  See original review Hide original review

  まず見た目から、いかにも一昔前のテンションラバーという感じで懐かしいですねー
  付属の粘着シートを付け忘れるとくるまってしまって貼るのに失敗します。

  バック面で薄を使用しました。

  良い点は回転のかけやすさと回転の分かりにくさ。
  回転の最大量は粘着やスピンテンションと比べて多くはないですが、十分(意外と)かかります。
  特にツッツキのときのぎゅっと食い込んでボールを掴む感じは気持ちよくて病みつきに。
  テンション系特有の弾道を出すことができ、ナックルカットとの見分けもつきにくいです。
  更に球質の差を付けるためにもう片方の面は粘着にすると良いと思います。

  とここまで良いことを書いてますが、カットのバック面に使うには少々飛び過ぎかなと思います。
  この飛んでいってしまう感じはどうしても慣れる感じがしません。
  (そのわりに攻撃するにしては軟らかすぎて弾まない)

  10年ほど前中学生のときフォア面に使っていたときの方が印象がいいです。
  とはいえフォア用ならば、今の時代これより安いか同じくらいでもっと良いラバーがあるのではと思ってしまい、このラバーを使う意味はなんなのだろうと、、
  故にこの評価にさせていただきました。

  2017/04/03

  Overall	6/10
  Speed	3
  Spin	7
  Control	6
  Hardness	Soft

  Recomend racket SPLINE D1

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  19

1. 1
2. 2
3. 3
4. Next >