NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  KILLER

  

  I would like to put 1.5 mm on the Dynasty carbon and review it
  The first impression is that I thought that control was difficult
  Anyway, it was hard to control because it was difficult to control, and even if it was a block of one course, it was very difficult to get in and out.
  There was a feeling that the ball of the other party was likely to be pushed in with patin and knuckle without being beaten than I thought
  I felt that it was very good to be able to flip the cut well and put it to myself to some extent, but it was difficult to reduce the distance because the sponge was thick
  When you can attack it, you realize that it will all miss if it is a half-impacted impact, and it will be stable and will stay on the table if you strengthen the impact a little
  In addition, it was difficult to spin from my own, and I felt that it was the role of this rubber that you could fall into the opponent with knuckles and make chances, and it seemed that it was difficult to play the opponent's racquet.

  See original review Hide original review

  ダイナスティーカーボンに1.5mmを貼ってレビューしたいと思います
  まず第１印象はコントロールが難しいと思ったことです
  とにかくコントロールが難しくワンコースのブロックですら散らばり入ったり入らなかったりで大変落ち着きませんでした
  が相手の回転は思ったより喰らわず大体の球はパチンとナックルで押し込められそうな感じを受けました
  カットはよく反転するし自分でもある程度かけることができてとてもよく感じましたがスポンジが厚いため飛距離を抑えることに難しさを感じました
  攻めるときは中途半端なインパクトだと全部ミスになってしまうことに気づき少しインパクトを強めると安定して台に収まってくれます
  また自分から回転をかけることは難しくナックルで相手に落として貰うことやチャンスメイクすることがこのラバーの役目かなと感じ自分で変化を出したり回転をかけて相手のラケットを弾くことは難しく思えた

  2019/07/05

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	5
  Control	4
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket DYNASTY CARBON XU XIN EDITION

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  CARBONADO 245

  

  First of all, the first impression of this racket is that the hitting sound is quite high
  And although it is sticking slightly sticky, it is fairly spherical apart, but it is not a stick but a solid arch line
  It was a little uneasy to paste on the back but it was a little uneasy but it was a big right It was easy for Chiquita to do very quickly and it was pretty easy to use for me who normally uses grains to compensate for the early release of the ball of the racket by the rubber is

  See original review Hide original review

  まずこのラケットで打った第1印象は打球音がかなり高いことです
  そして微粘着を貼っているのにかなり球離れが早い、のに棒球ではなくしっかりと弧線がでる
  バックにはかなり柔らかいラバーを貼り少し不安でしたが大正解でしたとてもチキータがやりやすいしラケットの球離れが早いのをラバーで補ってくれて普段粒を使っている私にはかなり使いやすかったです

  2017/10/28

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	6
  Control	7
  Touch	9
  Hardness	Hard

  Recommend rubber（Front） GENESIS M

  Recommend rubber（Back） MANTRA S

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  DNA Hybrid XH

  

  I stuck black MAX on Centric Carbon and hit it. It weighed about 52g and was a safe and universal weight considering the hardness. The feeling of hitting the ball was not that great compared to the stated hardness of 52.5 degrees, and I don't think you would know it was 50 degrees because the sheet is soft. I think there is something that stands out about the speed. I think it is a cut above other sticky tensions (K3 and 09C). That said, I didn't feel like the ball was straight. However, the amount of spin was mediocre, and the ball rose after hitting, but it didn't sink, and there were occasional over-misses of 1.2 balls. Some players also said that the ball was too light, so it may be difficult to compete with the amount of spin. As for counters, I don't feel like I'm receiving the opponent's spin very much, but I have the impression that it was difficult to settle because it had a long flight distance and no spin. However, as for drives against the bottom, I was able to easily drive without touching it because of the flight distance and the feeling of it rising up. In summary, it is a normal tension rubber rather than a sticky tension, and I think it is suitable for people who are interested in stickiness from tension.

  See original review Hide original review

  セントリックカーボンに黒MAXを貼り打ちました
  重さは52gほどで硬度からするとぼちぼち無難で普遍的な重さでした
  打球感は表記硬度の52.5度からするとそこまでではなく、シートが柔らかめな為か50度と言われても分からないと思います
  スピードについては光る物があると思います
  他の粘着テンション（K3や09Ｃ）に比べ頭一つ抜けていると思います
  かと言って球が直線的になっている感覚はありませんでした
  しかし回転量につきましては、凡といった形で、打球後上がってくれるのですが球が沈んでくれず球1.2個分のオーバーミスが散見されました
  受け手からも球が軽くて仕方ないといった感想もあり、回転量で勝負するには厳しい性能かもしれません
  またカウンターにつきましても、相手の回転を受ける感覚はあまりありませんが、飛距離がでるのと回転が掛からないので収まりが悪かった印象があります
  ですが対下のドライブにつきましては、飛距離と上に上がる感覚からノータッチで抜くようなドライブは簡単にできました
  まとめと致しましては、粘着テンションというより普通のテンションラバーでテンションから粘着に興味ある人が使うのに適しているのではないでしょうか

  2024/04/09

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	6
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket CENTRIC CARBON

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  ORIGINAL No.1

  

  I used the original No.1 83g for about half a year.
  The rubbers I used are Kage, Jikihai H, and V20DE.
  The concept of this racket is the Ryu 5 Donic version.
  As per the concept, it is very similar to the Ryu 5, and I think it has reproduced at a high level the contradictory performance of being able to grab the ball and hit it high, while also being easy to get distance from.
  The grip shape is also similar, and like the Ryu 5, it is quite thin.
  Also, Donic does not list the official size, and there seems to be some variation in racket sizes, so I think it would be best to choose the one you like.

  See original review Hide original review

  オリジナルNo.１　83ｇを半年ほど使用致しました。
  ラバーは影とジキハイＨ、V20DEを貼りました。
  このラケットのコンセプトと致しましては、龍5ドニックver.になります。
  そのコンセプト通り龍5にかなり似ており掴んで上に出るのに飛距離を出しやすいといった
  矛盾した性能を高いレベルで再現出来ていると思います。
  グリップ形状も似ており、龍5同様かなり細く仕上がっております。
  またドニックから公式サイズは記載されておらず、ラケットサイズにバラつきがあるようなので気に入った物を選んで頂ければよいかと思います。

  2024/04/10

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	10
  Control	8
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber（Front） JEKYLL＆HYDE H52.5

  Recommend rubber（Back） VS＞402 DOUBLE EXTRA

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

• 

  Q3

  

  Purchase red thick stock
  It was similar to Tenaji 05 (thick), but the other was degradation number 05
  I got the impression that the top seed is soft and the sponge is hard
  Weight was 94.5 to 93.0 inclusive of packages and 94.0 was chosen
  In addition, I thought that the previous team was pretty similar to 05 but when it fell to the back, all the balls became
  I will recommend using the front team or Ojima to use it as back as the player said

  See original review Hide original review

  赤の特厚を購入
  飛び出し方がテナジー05（厚）にそっくりでしたがそれ以外は劣化番05でした
  トップシードが柔らかくスポンジが硬いような印象を受けました
  重さはパッケージ込みで94.5~93.0の物があり94.0を選んだ
  あと前陣ではかなり05に似ていたと思うが後陣に下がると棒球ばかりになってしまった
  前陣で扱うか大島選手が言っていたようにバックに使うことをオススメします

  2017/10/05

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	4
  Spin	8
  Control	5
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket CARBONADO 190

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2