NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  MANTRA M

  

  I used it because it was recommended by an acquaintance while I was looking for a rubber for the counter.
  The good point is the goodness of catching and the moderate speed of ball separation.
  The counter was easy to do with these two.
  Since the ball is a little fast away from the ball, it is insensitive to rotation to some extent, so the receive feels good.
  However, since the trajectory was straight, the sense of stability when attacking from myself was a subtle feeling.
  I think that it is suitable for how to fight such as a counter that the partner's lift was broken → Tsutsuzuki that took advantage of the hook of the sheet, and a lot of bat-type batting methods.

  See original review Hide original review

  カウンター向きのラバーを探しているなかで知人から勧められたので使用してみました。
  良かった点としては、引っ掛かりの良さと球離れの適度な速さです。
  この２つによってカウンターがやりやすかったです。
  球離れがやや速いので回転に対してある程度鈍感なのでレシーブも好感触です。
  ただ、弾道が直線的なので自分から攻めるときの安定感は微妙かなといった感じでした。
  シートの引っ掛かりを活かした切れたツッツキ→相手が持ち上げたのをカウンターといった戦い方、ミート系の打法を多用する方に向いていると思います。

  2019/04/30

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Kenta Matsudaira ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  7

• 

  VO＞102

  

  It is one of my favorite table rubbers.
  In the table of horizontal tension, rotation and elasticity are quite good.
  I used it on the back side, but I was able to do most of the tricks that can be done with the back software, I also felt that it was possible to play flicks and flicks that are specific to the table, and that the range of play was broadened.
  Although knuckles are hard to come out, it does not mean that they do not come out.
  Also, if the amount of rotation on the table is too low, the other party who is off guard will miss the receive, and it will also serve.
  I would like it to be used by players of the back table and the fore table that fights and mixes the drive and the meat by all means.
  I think it will be a good companion if you take care of the thickness because it is a rubber that boils in its own way.

  See original review Hide original review

  大好きな表ラバーの１つです。
  横目のテンション表で、回転と弾みがかなり良いです。
  バック面で使用しましたが、表らしい弾く打ち方も回転系の技術も上々で、プレーの幅が広がる表です。
  ナックルは出ない訳ではない、といったところです。
  ドライブやミートを織り混ぜて戦うバック表やフォア表の選手にぜひ使って欲しいです。
  それなりに弾むラバーなので、厚ささえ気を付ければ良き相棒になってくれると思います。

  2019/05/05

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	9
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Kenta Matsudaira ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  5

• SUPER VENTUS

  

  Anyway, the impression that it is a rubber with no habit and no difficult technology.
  There is no problem whether you drive or meet.
  Compared to high-priced products such as Tenergy, the amount of rotation and speed will drop by one step, but I think that it is a performance that is satisfactory for intermediate users.
  I don't really care about the back table, but it's a relatively heavy rubber, so you might want to pay attention to that point.
  The team member told me that it gave me a sense of stability after making it Ventus, so I will change it from my favorite Rakuza 7 to this.

  See original review Hide original review

  とにかくクセがなく、やりづらい技術がないラバーという印象。
  ドライブでもミートでも問題なし。
  テナジーなどの高価格帯と比較すると回転量やスピードは１段落ちるが、中級者なら十分満足できる性能だと思う。
  自分はバック表であまり気にならないが、比較的重めのラバーなのでその点だけ注意した方がいいかも。
  チームの方から、ヴェンタスにしてから安定感が出たと言われたので愛用してたラクザ7からこちらに変更します。

  2020/05/21

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	8
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket Ai Fukuhara PRO · ZLF

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  DNA PRO S

  

  Changes from Rakuza X are both thick.
  Compared to Rakuza, the weight is considerably lighter and the swing-off is better.
  The seat has a high grip, and Tsuttsuki has a good impression.
  In terms of attack technology, the meatball is ◎ thanks to its softness. The drive is powerful, but it is stable.
  However, because the loop was soft, it seemed that the flight distance would be longer than intended and that it would not seem to be suitable for raising the seat.

  The drive type that seeks a sense of stability rather than power, it seems to be good for meat hitting main.
  I'm probably going back to Rakuza because it doesn't seem to fit into a loop-intensive type.

  See original review Hide original review

  ラクザXからの変更、ともに厚です。
  ラクザと比較して、かなり重量が軽く、振り切りが良くなりました。
  シートはグリップ力が高く、ツッツキが好印象。
  攻撃技術で言うと、ミート打ちは柔らかさのおかげで◎。ドライブも威力はそこそこだけど安定するので◯。
  ただ、ループは柔らかさ故に意図したより飛距離が出てしまうのと、シートの上がりにくさで向いてなさそうな印象でした。

  威力より安定感を求めるドライブ型、ミート打ちメインの方には良さそうです。
  ループを多用するタイプには合わなさそうなので自分はおそらくラクザに戻します。

  2019/12/15

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	6
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket CLIPPER CR WRB

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  Fastarc C-1

  

  I do not have sharp performance, I think it is a featureless rubber in a good sense.
  There is no complaint about the amount of rotation and the sense of grip because the sheet is the same as G1.
  If you hit hard enough, you will get enough speed.
  I was uneasy because the sponge was soft, but I think that the sheet was too stiff or not to fly.
  I think that it is easy to handle any type of attack type if the drive and the meat system are powerful enough.
  If it is the same maker, it is good for step-up of the first intermediate level who used the fiction etc.

  See original review Hide original review

  尖った性能がなく、良い意味で特徴のないラバーだと思います。
  シートがG1と同じということで、回転量・グリップ感については文句なし。
  しっかり食い込ませるように打てばスピードも十分出ます。
  スポンジが柔らかめなので台上が不安でしたが、シートが固めなせいか飛びすぎる等はなかったと思います。
  ドライブでもミート系でもしっかり威力が出て、攻撃型ならどんなタイプでも扱いやすいラバーだと思います。
  同メーカーならファクティブ等を使っていた初中級者のステップアップにも良いですね。

  2019/05/05

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket CLIPPER CR WRB

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. Next >