NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  Rakza X

  

  The grip is amazing, as advertised by the manufacturer.
  Also, if there is power, it will be as powerful as it is.
  I think that a person who can swing firmly can play a good ball with a lot of rotation, but conversely, I need to give up swing performance to get the best performance, so I give up.
  Also noteworthy is that Chiquita is unusually easy to do. If you can make a strong impact, you may use it for the back.

  See original review Hide original review

  メーカーの宣伝通り、グリップ力がすごい。
  また、パワーがあればあるだけ威力が出る。
  しっかり振れる人ならかなり回転の乗った良いボールが出せると思うが、逆に言えば性能を引き出すにはスイングスピードが必要なため、自分は断念。
  あと特筆すべきは、チキータが異常にやりやすい。しっかりインパクトできるならバックに使っても良いかも。

  2020/05/21

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket CLIPPER CR WRB

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  7

• 

  DNA PRO S

  

  Changes from Rakuza X are both thick.
  Compared to Rakuza, the weight is considerably lighter and the swing-off is better.
  The seat has a high grip, and Tsuttsuki has a good impression.
  In terms of attack technology, the meatball is ◎ thanks to its softness. The drive is powerful, but it is stable.
  However, because the loop was soft, it seemed that the flight distance would be longer than intended and that it would not seem to be suitable for raising the seat.

  The drive type that seeks a sense of stability rather than power, it seems to be good for meat hitting main.
  I'm probably going back to Rakuza because it doesn't seem to fit into a loop-intensive type.

  See original review Hide original review

  ラクザXからの変更、ともに厚です。
  ラクザと比較して、かなり重量が軽く、振り切りが良くなりました。
  シートはグリップ力が高く、ツッツキが好印象。
  攻撃技術で言うと、ミート打ちは柔らかさのおかげで◎。ドライブも威力はそこそこだけど安定するので◯。
  ただ、ループは柔らかさ故に意図したより飛距離が出てしまうのと、シートの上がりにくさで向いてなさそうな印象でした。

  威力より安定感を求めるドライブ型、ミート打ちメインの方には良さそうです。
  ループを多用するタイプには合わなさそうなので自分はおそらくラクザに戻します。

  2019/12/15

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	6
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket CLIPPER CR WRB

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  7

• 

  VO＞102

  

  It is one of my favorite table rubbers.
  In the table of horizontal tension, rotation and elasticity are quite good.
  I used it on the back side, but I was able to do most of the tricks that can be done with the back software, I also felt that it was possible to play flicks and flicks that are specific to the table, and that the range of play was broadened.
  Although knuckles are hard to come out, it does not mean that they do not come out.
  Also, if the amount of rotation on the table is too low, the other party who is off guard will miss the receive, and it will also serve.
  I would like it to be used by players of the back table and the fore table that fights and mixes the drive and the meat by all means.
  I think it will be a good companion if you take care of the thickness because it is a rubber that boils in its own way.

  See original review Hide original review

  大好きな表ラバーの１つです。
  横目のテンション表で、回転と弾みがかなり良いです。
  バック面で使用しましたが、表らしい弾く打ち方も回転系の技術も上々で、プレーの幅が広がる表です。
  ナックルは出ない訳ではない、といったところです。
  ドライブやミートを織り混ぜて戦うバック表やフォア表の選手にぜひ使って欲しいです。
  それなりに弾むラバーなので、厚ささえ気を付ければ良き相棒になってくれると思います。

  2019/05/05

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	9
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Kenta Matsudaira ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  6

• 

  Q power

  

  Extra thick material is used on the foreground.
  I used to love the Q5, so I had high hopes that the flagship rubber would finally be released after it was discontinued.

  When I hit a drive on the one course, I couldn't help but laugh at how fast and heavy the drive came out.
  The trajectory felt somewhat linear. (Maybe I just feel that way because I usually have sticky tension)

  However, when it comes to all, things change completely. If you don't swing properly, you'll be hit by a parade of baseballs, and the difference between swinging and swinging is huge.
  I tried using it for a while, but when I thought about using it in a match, I didn't feel secure so I gave up.

  It is a rubber that has the image of Q5 with added power but with less ``feeling like it can do something'', and clearly shows the user's skill.

  See original review Hide original review

  特厚をフォア面に使用。
  かつてQ5を愛用していたので、廃盤になってからようやくフラグシップラバーが出るということでかなり期待していました。

  ワンコースでドライブを打つと、速い＆重いドライブが出て思わず笑ってしまいました。
  軌道はやや直線的に感じました。(普段が粘着テンションなのでそう感じるだけかも)

  ただ、オールになると一変。しっかり振れないと棒球のオンパレードで、振れたときとの落差がものすごい…。
  その後も1〜2ヶ月使ってみましたが、試合で使うことを考えるとあまりに安心感がなく断念。

  Q5に威力をプラスした代わりに「なんとかしてくれる感」を削ったようなイメージで、如実に使用者の腕が現れるラバーです。

  2023/12/29

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	8
  Control	6
  Hardness	Hard

  Recomend racket FORTIUS FT ver.D RE

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  5

• SUPER VENTUS

  

  Anyway, the impression that it is a rubber with no habit and no difficult technology.
  There is no problem whether you drive or meet.
  Compared to high-priced products such as Tenergy, the amount of rotation and speed will drop by one step, but I think that it is a performance that is satisfactory for intermediate users.
  I don't really care about the back table, but it's a relatively heavy rubber, so you might want to pay attention to that point.
  The team member told me that it gave me a sense of stability after making it Ventus, so I will change it from my favorite Rakuza 7 to this.

  See original review Hide original review

  とにかくクセがなく、やりづらい技術がないラバーという印象。
  ドライブでもミートでも問題なし。
  テナジーなどの高価格帯と比較すると回転量やスピードは１段落ちるが、中級者なら十分満足できる性能だと思う。
  自分はバック表であまり気にならないが、比較的重めのラバーなのでその点だけ注意した方がいいかも。
  チームの方から、ヴェンタスにしてから安定感が出たと言われたので愛用してたラクザ7からこちらに変更します。

  2020/05/21

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	8
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket Ai Fukuhara PRO · ZLF

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. Next >