NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  GOLDEN TANGO

  

  Since I used it in sticky debut, I have always loved it on the foreground side. Since stickiness is not so strong, I am sticking to it with TSP's adhesive sheet. I think that this rubber takes a lot of rotation, and of course, I think that it is a stop and a block, a counter, especially good. Stop stops considerably thanks to stickiness. When blocking, it brings out the flightlessness that it brings and it fits firmly on the table. If you can get the counter to call back, the speed enters steadily there so stablely that the mistake in this mistake has decreased considerably. I do not feel the sponge is harder than the display. It is recommended to try people who are mistaken in the former middle team, those who frequently use blocks or counters. (If you increase the adhesive strength with the adhesive sheet, it is recommended that the habit becomes stronger.)

  See original review Hide original review

  粘着デビューで使って以来、ずっとフォア面に愛用しています。粘着質は、そんなに強くないので、私はTSPの粘着シートで粘着力をあげています。このラバーは回転がかなりかかるのはもちろんのこと、特にいいのはストップとブロック、カウンターだと思います。粘着質のおかげでストップはかなり止まります。ブロックする時には持ち前の飛ばなさが発揮され、台にしっかり収まってくれます。かけ返すカウンターをできれば、スピードはそこそこに安定して入るのでこちらのミスでの失点がかなり減りました。スポンジは表示ほど硬くは感じません。前中陣でひたすらかける人、ブロックやカウンターを多用する人は試してみることをお勧めします。(粘着シートで粘着力をあげると、よりクセが強くなってお勧めです。)

  2018/12/12

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	10
  Control	9
  Hardness	Hard

  Recomend racket FORTIUS FT ver.D

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  13

• 

  FORTIUS FT ver.D

  

  I liked the feeling of holding a ball when I borrowed Fortius, and I knew that there was a ver.D with improved distance performance, so I purchased that. The first impression I hit was very satisfying because I hardly felt the difference between the Fortus ft and the feel at impact. There is more elasticity than ordinary 7-ply plywood, but the feel of hitting is much closer to wood than carbon, and in that sense the feeling of hitting is recommended for those who want to give distance in the wood group. However, I can not deny that it is inferior in speed in comparison with the racket of the usual outer carbon, but I think that it is easy to put on rotation because the ball holding is good. One of the points I like is that it is not difficult to stop because it is easy to put a strong and weak sharp as the feeling of hitting is almost wood.

  See original review Hide original review

  フォルティウスを借りて打った時のボールを持つ感覚が気に入り、さらに飛距離性能の上がったver.Dがあることを知ったので、そちらを購入しました。打ってみた第1印象はフォルティウスftとほとんど打感の違いを感じなかったのでとても満足でした。通常の7枚合板より弾みがありますが、カーボンよりも打感がかなり木材に近く、そういった意味で打感は木材派で飛距離を出したい方にはお勧めです。ただ、通常のアウターカーボンのラケットに比べたらスピードで劣るのは否めませんが、その分球持ちがいいので回転をかけやすいと思います。打感がほぼ木材であることから強弱のメリハリもつけやすいので、ストップなどがやりにくくないというのも気に入っているポイントの一つです

  2019/03/20

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber（Front） NEO HURRICANE 3

  Recommend rubber（Back） Q4

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  6

• 

  Q3

  

  I was surprised when I first used it! ! I tried it with a fore and a back, but I thought that it was for back. It is a good place to start with, but the amount of rotation of the loop drive is amazing. I feel that the ball lifts in the swing direction, I think that the energy loss is really small. Chiquita and backdrive are lower arcs and speed than the same Q series Q4. The meat system also got quite a bit of speed, the destructive power is so great, I can afford to play from anywhere because I can afford to fly away from the back of the middle. Of course Serve is quite expiring.
  If you listen to this far, it sounds like a very universal rubber, but of course it is also awkward to use. At the time of sticking or stopping, the ball pops out lower than I thought. I think that this trajectory does not get used to at the beginning and often applies to the net. However, I think that it is worthy to use even if there is this disadvantage because I think that it is possible to overcome enough with familiarity in this respect.

  See original review Hide original review

  初めて使った時には驚きました！！フォアとバックで試してみましたが、私としてはバック向きだと思いました。まずよかった所ですが、ループドライブの回転量がすごいです。スイングした方向にボールが持ち上がっていく感じがして、エネルギーロスが本当に少ないと思います。チキータやバックドライブは同じQシリーズのQ4よりも弧線が低く、スピードがあります。ミート系もかなりのスピードが出て、破壊力はすごく、中後陣から打っても飛距離には余裕があるので、どこからでもプレーできると思います。もちろんサーブもかなり切れます。
  ここまで聴くと超万能ラバーのように聞こえますが、もちろん使いにくい点もあります。つっつきやストップの際に、思ったよりボールが低く飛び出ます。この軌道が最初は慣れなくてネットにかけることも多いと思います。しかしこの点においては慣れで十分に克服可能だと思うのでこのデメリットがあっても使うに値するラバーだと思います。

  2018/12/12

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	7
  Control	8
  Hardness	Hard

  Recomend racket FORTIUS FT ver.D

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  5

• 

  GFT48

  

  I changed my racket to ver.D, so I thought if I had a chance, Mizuno's first rubber challenge. It certainly had a sense of rotation, controllability, speed three-time played and I could do anything without anything. It is noteworthy that there is an increase in the number of omissions in one shot at the speed of the drive. However, it is necessary to use care so that the receive will not float as it is a rubber that gives off distance. Also, I felt that the rotation amount of the loop drive was slightly small, so it might be good for a person who is good at bringing to the rally after the third ball.

  See original review Hide original review

  ラケットをver.Dに変えたので、せっかくならと思いMizunoのラバーに初挑戦。確かに回転量、コントロール性、スピード三拍子揃っていてなんでもそつなくこなせるといった感じでした。特筆すべきはドライブのスピードで1発で抜けることが増えました。ただ、飛距離の出るラバーなのでレシーブが浮かないように気を使う必要があります。また、ループドライブの回転量が若干少ないと感じたので、3球目以降のラリー戦に持ち込むのが得意な人は良いかもしれません。

  2018/12/12

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	7
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket FORTIUS FT ver.D

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1