NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  Fastarc C-1

  

  C-1 has that grip feel, and you can really feel the ball sink into the sponge.

  It also produces a decent arc, but compared to Tenergy, Dignics, or G-1, the speed and spin fall short.

  There's some spin, but it's still just average.

  Too much of that sinking-in feeling actually makes a rubber harder to hit with, but C-1 is easy to hit with.

  That said, when you use C-1 after using better rubbers, you often find yourself hitting the ball well but not scoring points for some reason.
  Loop drives in particular seemed to have less effect on the opponent and came back more easily.

  I think this is best used as a stepping stone for beginners and intermediate players transitioning to higher-level equipment like the ones mentioned above.
  It's not equipment for advanced players to choose.

  See original review Hide original review

  C-1は掴み感があり、ボールの食い込みを感じることができます。

  弧線もしっかりでますが、テナジーやディグニクス、G-1と比べるとスピードや回転がものたりません。

  回転量もありますが、やはり並。

  組み込み感はありすぎると逆に打ちづらくなりますが、C-1は打ちやすいです。

  ただ、より良いラバー達の後にC-1を使うと、こちらは調子良くボールを打ってるのに何故か得点にならないというケースが多いです。
  特にループドライブは相手への影響が少なく返ってきやすい印象でした。

  初心者や中級者が上記のようなハイレベルな用具に移行する間に使用するのは最適では無いでしょうか。
  上級者が選ぶ用具ではないです。

  2020/04/15

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	6
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket FIRE FALL AC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  11

• 

  VISCARIA

  

  I own a 90g one.
  I'll review it alongside comparisons to the Timo Boll ALC (82g) and Timo Boll Spirit (92g), which are said to use the same blade construction.

  Let me start with the conclusion.
  I can't believe these use the same wood!!

  The Timo Boll ALC I have might just be a lighter-density unit, since it has a grip feel, but it's missing that snappy, ball-shooting-through sensation that's typical of outer blades.

  Since the Spirit is close in weight, I expected a similar feel, but it's by far the number one in terms of how the ball shoots through. The feel is also hard.

  The Viscaria lets you really feel the grip on the ball while still delivering solid speed.
  The overall balance between bounce and grip (spin) is great, and I think a lot of offensive-style players would really like it.
  The arc is a bit on the lower side, so the ball reaches the table faster, which adds to the feeling of speed.

  That lower arc is just right — the ball clears the net safely while making the opponent feel a ball speed faster than it looks.

  The grip is on the thicker side, the type you can really clamp down on.
  That said, it fits surprisingly well, and even though I normally use a thinner grip, it didn't feel that out of place.

  It makes total sense that so many strong college players, working adults, and pro players all use this.

  See original review Hide original review

  90gを所持。
  板が同じと言われてるティモボルALC(82g)、ティモボルスピリット(92g)と比較を交えながらレビューします。

  最初に結論から。
  同じ木材を使ってるとは思えません！！

  ティモボルALCはスカスカの個体なのか掴み感はありますが、アウター特有のスパッと球の走る感覚がありません。

  スピリットは重さも近いので同じ感覚かと思いきや、球の走りがダントツでNo,1。打球感も硬いです。

  ビスカリアは掴み感をしっかりと感じられながらもスピードもしっかりでます。
  弾みと掴み(回転)のトータルのバランスが良く、オフェンシブな戦型の選手なら多くの人が気にいると思います。
  弧線は若干低めなので、台に到達様での時間が短くなるので寄りスピード感を感じます。

  この弧線の低さが丁度良く、ネットはしっかりこえて、相手に見た目以上の体感速度を感じさせられると思います。

  グリップは太めでガシッと掴めるタイプ。
  ただ、不思議とフィット感があり、普段は細めを使ってても違和感は小さいです。

  大学生、社会人の有力者たちやプロ選手がこぞって使用するのも納得の性能です。

  2020/04/15

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber(Front) DIGNICS 05

  Recommend rubber(Back) DIGNICS 80

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  9

• 

  DIGNICS 80

  

  I used to use Dignics 05, but with my level of skill, if I made too much contact it would overshoot, and there were a lot of times the ball would bounce off before really gripping the rubber and slam straight into the net, which was frustrating.

  Looking at the spec sheet, the Dignics 80 seems to trade some spin from the 05 for more speed.

  And indeed, it does bounce a bit more than the 05.

  That said, because of how the pimples on the topsheet are arranged, it feels a bit softer than the 05.

  Maybe that's why I can control the ball firmly — even though it bounces more than the 05, it's easier to keep shots short and controlled.

  The 05 probably has the edge in maximum spin and potential ceiling, but for my level, overall, the 80 scores higher.

  The feel and flight are close to Tenergy 05, but the arc is a bit lower. Because the arc is lower, the ball reaches the table faster, so it feels considerably faster in practice.

  It's a wonderful rubber that strikes a great balance between ease of use and power.

  See original review Hide original review

  ディグニクス05を以前は使っていましたが、自分の技術では当てすぎるとオーバーになったり、ボールがラバーに噛む前に弾んでしまいネットに突き刺さるシーンが多く悩んでいました。

  ディグ80はスペックシートを見るとディグ05から回転を下げてスピードを上げたようなデータになっています。

  事実、ディグ05より若干弾みます。

  ただ、シートの粒の配置で若干ディグ05より柔らかく感じます。

  そのおかげか、しっかりとボールをコントロールすることができ、ディグ05より弾みはするものの、短くコントロールするのが簡単です。

  最大の回転量や潜在的なポテンシャルはディグ05の方が上かも知れませんが、自分のレベルでトータルで見たら80の方が点数が上です。

  打球感や飛び方はテナジー05に近いですが、若干弧線は低くなります。弧線が低いことで台への到達スピードが速くなり、体感的にはかなりスピードが出ると思います。

  扱い安さと威力のバランスが取れた素晴らしいラバーです。

  2020/04/15

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ZLC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  9

• 

  DIGNICS 05

  

  I've used various tension rubbers over the years, and Tenergy 05 for a long time.

  Dignics is a fantastic rubber that beats Tenergy 05 in both speed and spin performance.
  The difference feels even bigger in practice than the spec sheet suggests.

  However, the problem is that this speed and distance means I've ended up overhitting more in close, pressured situations.

  Then again, I've also had misses where the ball just plunges straight into the net, which gives it a somewhat tricky impression to handle.

  There seems to be a real gap between this and my own sense of timing.
  I've used Tenergy 05 for a long time, but I never got this "off" feeling with it at all.

  It doesn't feel like a straightforward evolution of Tenergy 05 at all — it feels like a completely different rubber.
  There's no question it's a fantastic rubber, but it requires skill to use well, so it's not something I'd casually recommend to just anyone.

  This is a rubber I'd love to see used by, or aimed at, players looking to take their table tennis up a notch.

  See original review Hide original review

  今まで様々なテンションラバーを使い長らくテナジー05つかってきました。

  ディグニクスは素晴らしいラバーでスピード、回転性能共にテナジー05に勝ります。
  カタログのスペック差よりも体感的には大きな差があります。

  ただしかし、このスピード、飛距離が出ることが問題で、どうしてもせった場面でオーバーミスが増えてしまいました。

  かと思えばネットにボールが突き刺さるようなミスもあり、やや扱い辛い印象を受けます。

  自分の感覚と大きなズレがあるようです。
  テナジー05を長い間使用してきましたが、テナジー05にはこの感覚のズレてる印象は全くありません。

  テナジー05の正統進化というイメージは全くなく、別物の印象です。
  素晴らしいラバーなのは間違いありませんが、使いこなす技量が必要で誰にでも気軽に勧められるものではありません。

  ワンランク上の卓球をする方、目指す方にぜひ使って欲しいラバーです。

  2020/03/31

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	10
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ZLC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  8

• 

  Tomokazu Harimoto Innerforce ALC

  

  I have the 94g version.

  The blade is designed to be on the larger side.

  People often say a wider blade makes blocking easier, but since it's only a 1mm difference, personally I don't think it makes much difference.

  The real issue is the weight.
  It's naturally a bit heavy. (For reference, the Innerforce ZLC and Viscaria I mainly use were both 90g.)

  4g might seem like a small difference, but because the blade size is bigger, the weight is more concentrated toward the head, and you really feel the weight during your swing. (Maybe air resistance plays a small part too.)

  Rapid-fire exchanges are pretty tough on you.

  I think casual players or junior high schoolers who look up to Harimoto need to make adjustments, like using thick rubber instead of max thickness.

  The speed and spin are fantastic, so how you balance things out is the key.

  See original review Hide original review

  94gのものを所持。

  ブレードが大きめに設計されています。

  良くブレードが広いとブロックしやすいという方いますが、1mmの差ですので、個人的にはあまり変わらないと思ってます。

  問題なのは重さです。
  当然若干重いです。(参考までに、メインで使ってるインナーフォースZLCとビスカリアは90gでした。)

  4gは小さな差に感じるかも知れませんが、ブレードのサイズが大きいことでヘッドに重心がいきますし、スイングの時にかなり重さを感じます。(もしかしたら空気の抵抗なんかも僅かに影響があるかも)

  連打がかなりしんどいです。

  一般層や張本選手に憧れる中学生はラバーを特厚じゃなく厚にするとか工夫が必要だと思います。

  スピードや回転は素晴らしいラケットですのでバランスをどう取るかが鍵です。

  2020/04/15

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	10
  Control	8
  Touch	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber(Front) DIGNICS 05

  Recommend rubber(Back) DIGNICS 80

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  6

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. Next >