NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  Timo Boll ALC

  

  I have an 82g one.
  I'll compare it with what's said to be the same blade in a 90g Viscaria and a 92g Timo Boll Spirit.

  The Spirit, maybe because of its heavier weight, has a hard feel and bounces quite a lot.
  The Viscaria feels softer than the Spirit, has a solid grip on the ball, and overall has a very good balance.

  Now, as for the Timo Boll ALC in this review.

  The average weight of these blades is around 86g, with a lot of relatively light ones out there, so I can recommend it as a first blade for women who can't generate much swing speed, or for anyone who wants to try a special-material blade for the first time.

  That said, maybe because the one I own is a light 82g, its attacking performance is lower compared to the Viscaria and other outer blades.

  Even though the balance between bounce and grip (spin) is important,
  this 82g one feels like it has a slightly lower overall balance than the other two.
  If you want speed, use the Spirit; if you want a balance that includes spin, use the Viscaria.

  That said, the Spirit is discontinued, and the Viscaria is needlessly expensive.
  Compared to a typical outer blade, this has more than enough spec, and given that performance, I think the value for money is good too.

  Of course individual blades vary a lot, but when buying, I'd suggest looking for one closer to 90g.

  See original review Hide original review

  82gを所持。
  同じ板だと言われている90gのビスカリア、92gのティモボルスピリットと比較してみます。

  スピリットは重量がある個体だからか打球感が硬くかなり弾みます。
  ビスカリアはスピリットより打球感は柔らかく、掴みもしっかりしていてトータルがハイバランス。

  さて、本レビューのティモボルALCは。

  個体が平均86gで、比較的軽い個体が多く、スイングのスピードを出せない女性や、特殊素材に挑戦したい方の初めの一本としてオススメできます。

  ただ、自分の所持してるものが82gと軽量だからか、ビスカリアや他のアウター系のブレードと比べ攻撃性能が低いです。

  弾みと掴み(回転)のバランスが重要とはいえ、
  この82g個体はトータルのバランスは他2本に比べ若干低い印象です。
  スピードを求めるならスピリットを、回転も含めたバランスならビスカリアを使用します。

  とはいえ、スピリットは廃盤、ビスカリアは無駄に高額。
  一般的なアウターラケットと比べれば十分過ぎるスペックで、この性能ならコストパフォーマンスも良いと思います。

  もちろんラケットは個体差が大きいと思いますが、購入の際は90g近い個体を探す方が良いと思います。

  2020/04/15

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	8
  Control	8
  Touch	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber(Front) TENERGY 05 HARD

  Recommend rubber(Back) DIGNICS 05

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  6

• 

  Fastarc G-1

  

  Fastarc G-1 is called a classic for good reason — the sense of speed and grip on the ball are genuinely excellent.

  That said, I've mainly used Butterfly-style tension rubbers like Tenergy and Dignics up until now.

  With Butterfly-style tension rubbers, I feel like the arc comes naturally, but with G-1, if you hit without thinking about it, the trajectory comes out flat.

  If you make an effort to create that arc yourself, you can get a nice high trajectory.
  Also, when you really smack the ball, the power is fantastic.

  Be aware that German-style rubbers like G-1 and Japanese-style rubbers like Tenergy need completely different hitting techniques.

  See original review Hide original review

  ファスタークG-1は名作と言われるだけあって、スピード感やグリップ感等やはり素晴らしい性能です。

  ただ、自分は普段テナジーやディグニクスといったバタフライ系のテンションをメインでずっと使用して来ました。

  バタフライ系テンションは弧線が勝手に出るイメージなのですが、G-1は何も考えずに打つと直線的な弾道です。

  山を自分で作るように工夫して打つと弧線が大きくできます。
  また、ガツッとぶち当てた時の威力は素晴らしいです。

  G-1などドイツ系とテナジーなど日本系で打ち方が全く違うので気をつけてください。

  2020/04/15

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	8
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3