NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  REVOLDIA CNF

  

  The first racket equipped with the new material CNF.

  The feel at impact feels like the hardness of the core like an inner racket, but I also feel the grip of wood.

  The arch line is like an image between the inner and outer.

  There is a feeling of bounce of the outer racket and a feeling of bounce of the inner racket.

  It is a wonderful racket.

  But.
  It's an impression that price and performance don't match.

  Since the outer racket has a lower archwire, the arrival time of the platform is faster, so pressure can be applied to the other party,
  Inner ZLC is easier to do with arching and shorter stopping technology.

  Perfect for professionals who can spend as much money on equipment as they want.

  See original review Hide original review

  新素材CNFを搭載した初めてのラケット。

  打球感はインナーラケットのような芯の硬さを感じますが、木材の掴み感も感じます。

  弧線はインナーとアウターのあいだくらいのイメージです。

  アウターラケットの弾み感と、インナーラケットの弾み感があります。

  素晴らしいラケットです。

  が。
  値段と性能が見合っていない印象です。

  アウターラケットの方が弧線が低いため台の到達時間が早いので相手に圧力をかけられますし、
  インナーZLCのほうが弧線や短く止める技術がやりやすいです。

  完全に用具にお金をいくらでも払えるプロ向けです。

  2020/04/15

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	10
  Control	9
  Touch	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber（Front） DIGNICS 05

  Recommend rubber（Back） DIGNICS 80

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  30

• 

  Dignics 09C

  

  I often see reviews that are quite bouncy at first, but I don't think that is ever the case.

  Speaking of simple momentum, Tenergy 05 and G1 are more momentum.

  However, I think that this "does not bounce" is also an advantage.
  For example, Dignics 05 is a wonderful rubber, but it was too bouncy for me and increased over mistakes, but it has not been since 09c.

  I think that the most noteworthy are spin performance and control performance.
  Although the ball and changes do not appear as disgusting as China Rubber, the amount of rotation is one rank higher than other tension systems in general.

  I personally think, "Is control performance a problem of skill, not rubber?"
  The sheet has an exquisite sense of adhesion, has a unique feeling of holding the ball, and blocks and stops are easy to stop.

  09c greatly exceeds speed and distance compared to pure sticky rubber such as leopard neo3.

  Although there is a habit, I think that it is a shot feeling that is relatively easy to shift even for tension users.

  I do not recommend it for those who want to punch in one shot, but I think 09c is the best rubber for those who compete in serving and receiving tricks, changing the amount of rotation of the loop drive and hitting repeatedly.

  See original review Hide original review

  まず最初に結構弾むというレビューをよく見ますが、決してそんな事は無いと思います。

  単純な弾みで言えばテナジー05やG1の方が弾みます。

  ただ、この「弾まない」はメリットでもあると思います。
  例えばディグニクス05は素晴らしいラバーですが私にとっては弾み過ぎて、オーバーミスが増えましたが、09cにしてからはそれはありません。

  特筆すべきはスピン性能とコントロール性能だと思います。
  チャイナラバーほど嫌らしい球や変化は出ないものの、他のテンション系全般と比べてワンランク上の回転量。

  個人的には「コントロール性能ってラバーじゃなくて腕前の問題でしょ？」と普段は考えていますが、
  シートの粘着感が絶妙で、独特の球持ち感があり、ブロックやストップは止まりやすいです。

  キョウヒョウneo3等の純粋な粘着ラバーと比べると09cはスピードや飛距離で大きく勝ります。

  癖はありますが、テンションユーザーでも比較的移行しやすい打球感だと思います。

  1発で打ち抜きたいという方にはオススメしませんが、サーブやレシーブの小技や、ループドライブの回転量や連打の中で変化をつけて勝負する人にとって09cは最高のラバーだと思います。

  2020/03/31

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ZLC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  16

• 

  Innerforce Layer ZLC

  

  Owns 93g.
  Although we have an outer system, we will mainly review the comparison with the inner ALC (90 g) as there are many people who have already been compared.

  In terms of flight distance, it is about the same as inner ALC.
  ALC bounces slightly linearly, ZLC has a higher arc and it takes a little time for the ball to reach the table, so I think the speed is physically slow.

  The first difference is the shot feeling, the ALC is a little harder, the feeling is closer to the outer, and there is no big sense of incongruity in light and heavy hits.

  ZLC feels more like wood, and light tapping gives a rugged feel to wood.

  ZLC is a shot feeling with different tastes, but I think that if there is no resistance to the racket containing the material, ALC is a shot feeling that everyone will receive.

  The advantages of ZLC are the feeling of grabbing the ball, the height of the arc, and the distance that can be won when inquiring.
  It is difficult to complain because the total balance is in a high level.
  The outer carbon has a longer flight distance, but this inner ZLC also has a sufficient speed flight distance and is easy to control on the table.

  It is a convinced performance that many professional players who are powerful school players have many users.

  See original review Hide original review

  93gを所持。
  アウター系も所持していますが、既に比較されてる方が多いのでインナーのALC(90g)との比較をメインにレビューします。

  飛距離で言えばインナーALCとは同程度です。
  ALCのほうがやや直線的に弾み、ZLCの方が弧線が高くボールが台に到達するまで僅かに時間がかかるで、体感的にはスピードは遅いと思います。

  1番の違いは打球感で、ALCはやや硬め、アウターに近い感覚、軽打と強打で感覚に大きな違和感はありません。

  ZLCは木材よりの感覚で、軽打では木材のコツっとした感じですが強打すると素材のカンという感覚が強くなり、感覚に差があります。

  ZLCは好みが分かれる打球感ですが、素材入りラケットに抵抗がなければALCは万人受けする打球感だと思います。

  ZLCの利点はボールを掴む感覚と弧線の高さ、引き合いの時に負けない飛距離。
  トータルのバランスが高次元でまとまってるため、文句をつけづらいです。
  アウターカーボンのほうが飛距離は出ますが、このインナーZLCも十二分なスピード飛距離が出せますし、台上のコントロールもしやすいです。

  強豪校選手なプロ選手に使用者が多いのも納得の性能です。

  2020/03/31

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Touch	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber（Front） TENERGY 05

  Recommend rubber（Back） TENERGY 05

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  14

• 

  Innerforce Layer ALC

  

  Have 90g.
  Since there are many people who are compared with the outer, I will mainly review the comparison with the inner ZLC (93g).

  Speaking of the flight distance, it is about the same as the inner ZLC, but I think that the speed feels faster because it bounces slightly linearly compared to the ZLC.

  The first difference is the shot feeling, the ALC is a little harder, the feeling is closer to the outer, and there is no big sense of incongruity in light and heavy hits.

  ZLC feels more like wood, and light tapping gives a rugged feel to wood.

  ZLC is a shot feeling that tastes different, but I think that if there is no resistance to the racket containing the material, ALC will receive everyone.

  It is a racket with a rounded outer part that is more prominent than a wood racket.

  There is a slight impression, and you can understand that the professional usage rate is slightly lower. (Rotating performance and feeling of grasping the ball → inner ZLC, outer power if simple power)

  However, in the amateur feeling, the balance between the momentum and the grip is united in a high dimension,
  This can be one of the best for those who will do their best at table tennis.

  See original review Hide original review

  90gを所持。
  アウターとの比較されてる方は多いのでインナーのZLC(93g)と比較をメインにレビューします。

  飛距離で言えばインナーZLCとは同程度ですが、ZLCと比べるとやや直線的に弾むので体感的にはスピードは速く感じると思います。

  1番の違いは打球感で、ALCはやや硬め、アウターに近い感覚、軽打と強打で感覚に大きな違和感はありません。

  ZLCは木材よりの感覚で、軽打では木材のコツっとした感じですが強打すると素材のカンという感覚が強くなり、感覚に差があります。

  ZLCは好みが分かれる打球感ですが、素材入りラケットに抵抗がなければALCは万人受けすると思います。

  アウターの目立つ部分を丸めたようなラケットで、木材ラケットより威力が欲しいけど、アウターラケットはちょっと苦手、というような方にはとてもオススメです。

  どっちつかずな印象もあり、プロの使用率がやや低いのも理解できます。(回転性能やボールを掴む感覚→インナーZLC、単純な威力ならアウター系)

  ただ、アマチュア感では弾みと掴みのバランスが高次元でまとまっていて、
  これから卓球を頑張っていく方にとってはこれは最高の1本になりえます。

  2020/03/31

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	8
  Control	8
  Touch	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber（Front） TENERGY 05

  Recommend rubber（Back） TENERGY 05

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  12

• 

  TENERGY 05 HARD

  

  Shift from Tenergy 05 to Dignics 05,
  The amount of rotation and power of the dig were the best, but I tried the 05 hardware because the flight distance was too much and the over mistake increased.

  According to the catalog specification, it is quite hard 05 hardware, but it is as easy to strike as 05 when you actually hit it.

  The power and amount of rotation when hitting the ball is more than normal 05.

  As a result I am quite satisfied.

  However, there are two weak points.
  One is weight.
  05 It became 6g heavier just by making it hard.
  Of course there are individual differences, but there is no doubt that it is a heavy class of rubber.

  The second is the weakness of the ball when you do not miss it.
  Combined with the weight mentioned above, there will be no good balls to miss or miss.

  We do not recommend it for those who compete with repeated hits and small tricks.

  I want more power than 05!
  I want to punch in one shot!
  It is recommended for such a hard hitter.

  See original review Hide original review

  テナジー05→ディグニクス05と移行して、
  ディグの回転量や威力は最高でしたがどうしても飛距離が出過ぎてオーバーミスが増えたため05ハードを試してみました。

  カタログスペックではかなり硬い05ハードですが実際に打ってみると05同様に打ちやすいです。

  ガツっと球を当てた時の威力や回転量はノーマルの05以上です。

  結果としてはかなり満足しています。

  ただ、弱点が2つ。
  1つは重さ。
  05ハードにしただけで6g重くなりました。
  もちろん個体差もありますが、重い部類のラバーであることは間違いありません。

  2つ目は当て損ないの時のボールの弱さ。
  前述の重さと相まって、振り遅れたり当て損なうと良いボールは一切出ません。

  連打や小技で勝負する方にはオススメしません。

  05より威力を出したい！
  1発で打ち抜きたい！
  そんなハードヒッターにはオススメです。

  2020/03/31

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Hardness	Hard

  Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ZLC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  12

1. 1
2. 2
3. 3
4. Next >