NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  REVOLDIA CNF

  

  This is the first blade I've had with the new CNF material.

  The feel has that stiff core you get with an inner blade, but I can also feel the wood's grip on the ball.

  The arc feels like it's somewhere between an outer and an inner blade.

  It has both the bounce feel of an outer blade and the bounce feel of an inner blade.

  It's a wonderful blade.

  But.
  The price doesn't feel like it matches the performance.

  Outer blades have a lower arc, so the ball reaches the table faster and puts pressure on your opponent, while
  inner ZLC blades make it easier to get a good arc and stop the ball short.

  This is really for pros who can pay any amount of money for equipment.

  See original review Hide original review

  新素材CNFを搭載した初めてのラケット。

  打球感はインナーラケットのような芯の硬さを感じますが、木材の掴み感も感じます。

  弧線はインナーとアウターのあいだくらいのイメージです。

  アウターラケットの弾み感と、インナーラケットの弾み感があります。

  素晴らしいラケットです。

  が。
  値段と性能が見合っていない印象です。

  アウターラケットの方が弧線が低いため台の到達時間が早いので相手に圧力をかけられますし、
  インナーZLCのほうが弧線や短く止める技術がやりやすいです。

  完全に用具にお金をいくらでも払えるプロ向けです。

  2020/04/15

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	10
  Control	9
  Touch	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber(Front) DIGNICS 05

  Recommend rubber(Back) DIGNICS 80

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  32

• 

  Innerforce Layer ZLC

  

  I have the 93g version.
  I also own outer-carbon blades, but since a lot of people have already compared against those, I'll mainly review this against the inner ALC (90g).

  In terms of distance, it's about the same as the inner ALC.
  The ALC bounces a bit more in a straight line, while the ZLC has a higher arc and takes slightly longer for the ball to reach the table, so it feels a bit slower in practice.

  The biggest difference is the feel: the ALC is a bit harder, closer to an outer-carbon feel, with no big difference in feel between light and strong shots.

  The ZLC leans more toward a wood-like feel — on light shots it has that "tok" wood-like feel, but on strong shots the material's distinct "kan" feel comes through strongly, so there's more variation in feel.

  The ZLC's feel is a bit of an acquired taste, but if you're fine with special-material blades in general, I think the ALC has a feel that appeals to everyone.

  The advantages of the ZLC are the sense of gripping the ball, the height of the arc, and distance that holds up even during topspin rallies.
  The overall balance comes together at a really high level, which makes it hard to find fault with.
  Outer carbon blades give you more distance, but this inner ZLC still gives you more than enough speed and distance, and it's easy to control over the table too.

  It makes sense that a lot of top players at strong schools use this — the performance backs it up.

  See original review Hide original review

  93gを所持。
  アウター系も所持していますが、既に比較されてる方が多いのでインナーのALC(90g)との比較をメインにレビューします。

  飛距離で言えばインナーALCとは同程度です。
  ALCのほうがやや直線的に弾み、ZLCの方が弧線が高くボールが台に到達するまで僅かに時間がかかるで、体感的にはスピードは遅いと思います。

  1番の違いは打球感で、ALCはやや硬め、アウターに近い感覚、軽打と強打で感覚に大きな違和感はありません。

  ZLCは木材よりの感覚で、軽打では木材のコツっとした感じですが強打すると素材のカンという感覚が強くなり、感覚に差があります。

  ZLCは好みが分かれる打球感ですが、素材入りラケットに抵抗がなければALCは万人受けする打球感だと思います。

  ZLCの利点はボールを掴む感覚と弧線の高さ、引き合いの時に負けない飛距離。
  トータルのバランスが高次元でまとまってるため、文句をつけづらいです。
  アウターカーボンのほうが飛距離は出ますが、このインナーZLCも十二分なスピード飛距離が出せますし、台上のコントロールもしやすいです。

  強豪校選手なプロ選手に使用者が多いのも納得の性能です。

  2020/03/31

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Touch	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber(Front) TENERGY 05

  Recommend rubber(Back) TENERGY 05

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  16

• 

  Dignics 09C

  

  First off, I see a lot of reviews saying this bounces quite a lot, but I don't think that's true at all.

  In terms of pure bounce, Tenergy 05 or G1 bounce more.

  That said, I think this "doesn't bounce much" quality is actually an advantage too.
  For example, Dignics 05 is a great rubber, but for me it bounced too much and I kept overshooting - that hasn't happened since switching to the 09C.

  What really stands out is the spin and control performance.
  It doesn't produce the nasty, unpredictable balls that Chinese rubbers do, but compared to other tension rubbers in general, it's a notch above on spin.

  Personally I usually think "control performance is about skill, not the rubber," but
  the tackiness of the sheet is just right, giving it a distinct ball-holding feel, and blocks and stops are easy to hold back with.

  Compared to pure tacky rubbers like Hurricane Neo3, the 09C wins by a wide margin on speed and distance.

  It has its quirks, but I think tension-rubber users can transition to this feel relatively easily.

  I wouldn't recommend it if you want to blast through with one shot, but for someone who wins with small techniques on serve and receive, or by mixing up spin variations across a series of loop drives, I think the 09C is the best rubber out there.

  See original review Hide original review

  まず最初に結構弾むというレビューをよく見ますが、決してそんな事は無いと思います。

  単純な弾みで言えばテナジー05やG1の方が弾みます。

  ただ、この「弾まない」はメリットでもあると思います。
  例えばディグニクス05は素晴らしいラバーですが私にとっては弾み過ぎて、オーバーミスが増えましたが、09cにしてからはそれはありません。

  特筆すべきはスピン性能とコントロール性能だと思います。
  チャイナラバーほど嫌らしい球や変化は出ないものの、他のテンション系全般と比べてワンランク上の回転量。

  個人的には「コントロール性能ってラバーじゃなくて腕前の問題でしょ？」と普段は考えていますが、
  シートの粘着感が絶妙で、独特の球持ち感があり、ブロックやストップは止まりやすいです。

  キョウヒョウneo3等の純粋な粘着ラバーと比べると09cはスピードや飛距離で大きく勝ります。

  癖はありますが、テンションユーザーでも比較的移行しやすい打球感だと思います。

  1発で打ち抜きたいという方にはオススメしませんが、サーブやレシーブの小技や、ループドライブの回転量や連打の中で変化をつけて勝負する人にとって09cは最高のラバーだと思います。

  2020/03/31

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ZLC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  16

• 

  Innerforce Layer ALC

  

  Mine is 90g.
  A lot of people compare this to outer-carbon blades, so I'll mainly compare it to the inner ZLC (93g) in this review.

  In terms of distance it's about the same as the inner ZLC, but compared to the ZLC it bounces a bit more in a straight line, so I think it feels faster in practice.

  The biggest difference is the feel - the ALC is a bit harder, closer to an outer-carbon feel, and there's no big gap in feel between light touches and hard hits.

  The ZLC feels more wood-like - with light touches you get that woody "tok" feel, but hit it hard and the carbon's "kan" sound and feel becomes more pronounced, so there's more of a gap in feel there.

  The ZLC's feel is something people are split on, but if you're not put off by composite blades in general, I think the ALC will appeal to pretty much everyone.

  It's like a blade that rounds off the more extreme edges of an outer-carbon blade, so I'd really recommend it to anyone who wants more power than an all-wood blade but isn't quite comfortable with outer-carbon blades.

  It does give a bit of a jack-of-all-trades impression, which I can see is why fewer pros use it. (For spin performance and that feeling of gripping the ball → inner ZLC; for sheer power → outer-carbon blades)

  That said, from an amateur's perspective, the balance between bounce and grip on the ball comes together at a really high level,
  and for anyone working to improve at table tennis going forward, this could turn out to be the best blade for them.

  See original review Hide original review

  90gを所持。
  アウターとの比較されてる方は多いのでインナーのZLC(93g)と比較をメインにレビューします。

  飛距離で言えばインナーZLCとは同程度ですが、ZLCと比べるとやや直線的に弾むので体感的にはスピードは速く感じると思います。

  1番の違いは打球感で、ALCはやや硬め、アウターに近い感覚、軽打と強打で感覚に大きな違和感はありません。

  ZLCは木材よりの感覚で、軽打では木材のコツっとした感じですが強打すると素材のカンという感覚が強くなり、感覚に差があります。

  ZLCは好みが分かれる打球感ですが、素材入りラケットに抵抗がなければALCは万人受けすると思います。

  アウターの目立つ部分を丸めたようなラケットで、木材ラケットより威力が欲しいけど、アウターラケットはちょっと苦手、というような方にはとてもオススメです。

  どっちつかずな印象もあり、プロの使用率がやや低いのも理解できます。(回転性能やボールを掴む感覚→インナーZLC、単純な威力ならアウター系)

  ただ、アマチュア感では弾みと掴みのバランスが高次元でまとまっていて、
  これから卓球を頑張っていく方にとってはこれは最高の1本になりえます。

  2020/03/31

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	8
  Control	8
  Touch	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber(Front) TENERGY 05

  Recommend rubber(Back) TENERGY 05

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  12

• 

  TENERGY 05 HARD

  

  I moved from Tenergy 05 to Dignics 05,
  and while the spin and power of Dignics were amazing, the ball flew too far and I started overshooting a lot, so I tried 05 Hard.

  On paper the specs make 05 Hard sound really hard, but when I actually hit with it, it's just as easy to use as regular 05.

  When you really crack the ball, the power and spin are beyond normal 05.

  Overall I'm quite satisfied.

  But there are two weak points.
  One is the weight.
  Just switching to 05 Hard added 6g.
  Of course there's variation between individual sheets, but there's no doubt it's on the heavy side.

  The second is how weak the ball is on a mishit.
  Combined with the weight I mentioned, if your swing is late or you mishit, you get absolutely nothing good out of it.

  I wouldn't recommend it if your game is built around quick exchanges and small technique.

  If you want more power than 05!
  If you want to blow through with one shot!
  Then this is for hard hitters like that.

  See original review Hide original review

  テナジー05→ディグニクス05と移行して、
  ディグの回転量や威力は最高でしたがどうしても飛距離が出過ぎてオーバーミスが増えたため05ハードを試してみました。

  カタログスペックではかなり硬い05ハードですが実際に打ってみると05同様に打ちやすいです。

  ガツっと球を当てた時の威力や回転量はノーマルの05以上です。

  結果としてはかなり満足しています。

  ただ、弱点が2つ。
  1つは重さ。
  05ハードにしただけで6g重くなりました。
  もちろん個体差もありますが、重い部類のラバーであることは間違いありません。

  2つ目は当て損ないの時のボールの弱さ。
  前述の重さと相まって、振り遅れたり当て損なうと良いボールは一切出ません。

  連打や小技で勝負する方にはオススメしません。

  05より威力を出したい！
  1発で打ち抜きたい！
  そんなハードヒッターにはオススメです。

  2020/03/31

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Hardness	Hard

  Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ZLC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  12

1. 1
2. 2
3. 3
4. Next >